The Great War was the most horrific and blood thirsty war in history. It was started by the assassination of the Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand.

Authors Avatar

Compare viewpoints and style in several contrasting poems of The Great War

        

        The Great War was the most horrific and blood thirsty war in history. It was started by the assassination of the Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand. The battlefields were endless stretches of trenches, this was known as the Western Front. The trenches were an awful place to live, they were made out of sandbags, duckboards, and rotting corpses. The trenches were also wet, muddy and full of vermin and disease. Many soldiers got trench foot, which was caused by standing in the mud and stagnant water that filled the trenches. Many soldiers also were suffering from neurasthenia (shell shock) this was a nervous disorder that was brought on by all the horrific factors of the war; the noise, seeing people dying a quick and painless death or a long and agonising one which the other soldiers could not do anything about it.

        Many poems were written during the early stages of the war to help recruitment for the army, at this stage recruitment was voluntary, but in 1916 all men over the age of 16 had to join the army. If you refused a white feather was posted through your letterbox-this signified that you were a coward.  

An example of a poem, which was written to recruit people to the army, is `Who’s for the Game? ` By Jessie Pope. This poem’s imagery makes war sound like a game or show. It makes it sound this way because she uses words like ‘fun’, ‘tackled’ and a good example is in the title, `Who’s for the Game?` Using these sorts of images makes the person reading the poem think that the worst you can do is suffer a sporting injury. The poem also has a perfect rhyme scheme, the rhymes are on alternative lines, ABAB CDCD and so on, an example of the rhyming is, ‘fight’ and ‘tight’ most of the rhyming words are one syllable long and there is a long pause after nearly every line this is due to punctuation such as full stops and question marks. The rhythm and rhyme are made this simple so the poem is simple and easy to read and so that it ca be chanted and easy to remember.

Pope also uses euphemisms, which makes the war sound not as bad to the reader. Pope uses euphemisms because the amount of people ready to go to war would definitely decline if Pope said that you were likely to die either a quick or long drawn out death. Pope got away with using these because news coming from the war was censored so nobody knew what was really going on out their except the men who had been sent home to be treated for war wounds or psychological problems. Pope said in her poem, ‘Who would rather come back with a crutch’ as if that was the worst thing that could happen to you whereas that was the luckiest thing that could happen to you, she also said ‘ Who knows this won’t be a picnic - not much’ meaning that it might be a little uncomfortable and not that you would probably be witnessing the death of you friends.

Join now!

Pope uses a lot of rhetorical questions; rhetorical questions are questions that don’t need an answer because the answer is obvious. She uses them to sort of hypnotise the reader by giving them two choices, these are to either make you say yes or no but the way that she asks the questions only gives you one answer and that is yes, for example ‘Who’s for the game?’ and ‘Who’ll give his country a hand?’

Pope also uses jingoism she says, ‘Your country is up to her neck…’ this implies that Britain is female the jingoistic idea in this ...

This is a preview of the whole essay