The Immorality of Cosmetic Animal Testing

Authors Avatar

The Immorality of Cosmetic Animal Testing

63% of the United States thinks that that it is morally acceptable to test cosmetics on animals (2facts.com). Animal testing in general is a very controversial topic among doctors and cosmeticians alike. The medical knowledge and different vaccines gained from animal testing has saved many lives. However, exactly how many lives has cosmetic testing saved? The Cosmetic Companies claim that the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) requires that products be tested on animals, for the safety of the consumer (clearleadinc.com). This feeble excuse is untrue; the FDA has only stated that each ingredient and the finished product are safe for both humans and animals. If the government were to ban this form of animal testing then scientists could more thoroughly explore the use of computer models. This would not only protect the welfare of animals, but it would also focus on what effects the products would have on humans. Therefore, cosmetic animal testing should be banned because it isn’t very reliable, creates terrible side effects, and uses inhumane methods.

Join now!

  Reliable is usually described as being trusted and accurate. Yet, how can you trust invalid comparisons? Humans and rabbits are not the same. Rabbits’ eyes, for example, have a thinner cornea, a third eyelid, and they also produce fewer tears to wash away any toxins (Problems with Skin…).  So, when a test is conducted they are only measuring the animals’ reaction not a person’s reaction.  Likewise, compounds that cause no harm to animals might be dangerous for humans, and vice versa (Maria Liberty). Unless the companies were to start experiments using tissues samples from humans, they’ll never have truly ...

This is a preview of the whole essay