• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Importance of the Conflict and Resolution in King Henry IV Part I

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Importance of the Conflict and Resolution in King Henry IV Part I The conflict and resolution of a play are its most important features. The conflict is the opposition of forces that ties one event to another and makes the plot move. Without conflict there can be no plot and hence there can be no drama. The resolution or denouement is the tying up of 'looses ends'. This plays an important role also as it is vital that all the unresolved issues be 'cleared up' before the ending of the play. There are two types of conflicts- external and internal conflicts. According to Spudgirl, "King Henry IV Part I centres on a core theme of conflict between order and disorder". This is indeed true, as conflict is pivotal in this genre. The exposition of the play centres on conflict its opening lines, "So shaken as we are, so wan with care", uttered by King Henry, exemplifies both types of conflict. The first type of conflict, i.e., the external conflict is reflected in these lines. ...read more.

Middle

Herein lies the theme of disguise. It is ironic that Henry used the art of disguise to acquire the throne and he now falls back on this same method to rid his conscience of the guilt he feels for deposing Richard II. Another example of conflict in the explanation is between the King and his son, Prince Hal. This conflict brings out the theme of family relationships. The news of Hotspur's victory resulted in Henry revealing that he wished that someone would tell him that Hotspur and Hal were switched at birth. Hotspur does things that " a prince can boast of," in fact Henry described him as " the theme of honoured tongue." The King is disheartened by the fact that while Hotspur is the epitome of honour, " riot and dishonour stains the brow" of the Prince. This conflict gives rise to the motif of honour. This motif of honour is pivotal to the entire play. In fact it is this motif that initiates the conflict between Hotspur and the King. ...read more.

Conclusion

Hal is the balance between the two extremes as he does not underestimate honour but he is not obsessed with it either. On the battlefield Hal fully understands the meaning of honour, and during his physical conflict with Hotspur, he exchanged all his indignities for Hotspur's honour when Hal killed him. The death of Hotspur and the defeat of the opposition led to the resolution of the play. The resolution is vital as it cleared up all the unresolved conflicts and as a result the resolution can be viewed as the bridge between the beginning and the ending of the play. In the resolution the father-son conflict was cleared up and the two extremes of honour were replaced by the real representation of honour - Hal. The resolution can also be used to conclude the fact that Hal has undergone peripeteia , and in so doing he has moved away from the tavern world and into the court world. Conflict and resolution are intertwined as without one there cannot be the other. The conflicts originated in the exposition and continued right up to the resolution of the play. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other works section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other works essays

  1. The contrast between Hotspur and Hal is the main theme in Henry IV part ...

    He says that he is aware of the nature of his tavern companions but will put up with their idleness for a while. He will imitate the sun by allowing himself to be covered with clouds, so that when he reappears it will be amazing, "My reformation glittering o'er my

  2. In his opening soliloquy, the true nature of Richards character is revealed, his villainy ...

    the way that both actors deliver their lines; the conveyance of a sense of bitterness which is especially apparent in the lines of self-analysis. While Olivier relays this with the rising of his voice, Pacino does so in a much more subtle manner; with the down turning of his lips.

  1. Comment on and analyse the role of women in the King Richard 3rd?

    Shakespeare does not use the fact that women have less power than men as one of his aims in the play, however he does use it in the way that Richard has and wants more political power whereas the women have none although what they do have is moral power which Richard has none of either.

  2. A comparison (up to the end of Act 3) of the 'courts' of Henry ...

    This shows that a type of 'slang' language would be used amongst the Prince and his fellows, but the King would not allow his Country's speech to be attacked like that. There is one exception where Hal uses the King's type of speech: this is were he talking about how

  1. Consider How Shakespeare Presents and Develops the Character of Prince Hal and Hotspur In ...

    alcohol and as a man who takes little if any responsibility for his actions. Then suddenly at the end of Act 1 Scene 2, Prince Hal delivers his soliloquy, which makes the audience wonder if Prince Hal would rather have his playboy image or if he has even bigger aspirations

  2. To what extent does the tragedy of Titus Andronicus unfold from the protagonist and ...

    Both are vicious and single minded in their revenge, creating the destructive cycle they are both in. In some ways, Tamora is superior to Titus as whilst her sons seem to be sacred to her, Titus betrays and kills his own children, whilst Tamora begs for her son's life she

  1. How far do you agree that the ending of Henry IV (part 2) is ...

    From Hal rejecting Falstaff is made the audience realise that now he would not be tempted to drink and socialise as much in Eastcheap. However, if it wasn't because of Falstaff taking him to Eastcheap Henry V may not have had the same experience and made the same decisions when he became King if he hadn't have socialised with Falstaff.

  2. Richard III, explore the way Shakespeare shapes an audience's response to Richard

    18, which Shakespeare could have wanted Richard to include in the soliloquy because it is a feeling that many in the audience can relate to and thus feel that they can connect with him. It is at this point that we can understand why Richard feels rejected by the Yorkists,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work