• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The opening to Baz Luhrmann's 'Romeo and Juliet' seems a dramatic contrast to that of Franco Zeffirelli's.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The opening to Baz Luhrmann's 'Romeo and Juliet' seems a dramatic contrast to that of Franco Zeffirelli's. The two films being set in different periods is the first thing that produces the known difference right away. Both films right at the start have something in common, they don't show a full screen view straight away. Franco Zeffirelli's opens with the usual titles, in a somewhat medival font, these titles are shown over a view of what is thought to be the town of Verona. The view is made up of yellows and golds this adds to the calmness and solem voice of the voiceover-. The voiceover is reading the introduction to the play - he speaks slowly like the story of a great tradedy is about to be told, which it is. ...read more.

Middle

The news in on the television, a black woman is reporting, this signifies the city of Verona beach is a multicultural enviroment. The camera slowly zooms in on the tv. The news reporter is like the voice over on Zeffirelli's reading the introduction to the play. The language is the same, just the accent and dialogue are different. When the introduction has been read, the camera shots are quick, snappy and fast showing scenes of different parts of Verona, including the two sky scrapers one belonging to the Montagues and one the Capulets, this gives us the understanding that they are business rivals. The music over this is modern orchestra which adds to the drama and impact. Once again a voiceover tells the introduction in a voice which is slower than the newsreader, like in Zeffirellis version and along side parts of it in text ...read more.

Conclusion

The features of these boys daily lives seem to be shown,rich and don't know what to do with themselves. Trouble comes when they meet with a Montague guns are pulled out and vicious talk begins. The two films are set entirely different but still remain to open to give a good understaning of the intro to the play and the era in which the two are set. The camera shots are more much varied in Luhrmann's version, to give the effects that were proably unknown in 1968 when Zeffirellis version was filmed. Luhrmann seems to give a buzz to the whole idea of Romeo and Juliet this is shown in his opening by the music, the shots and the pace wheras Zeffirelli wanted to keep the film as original as possible and this clarifys why everything is much more sedate and no accent comes into the speech. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Romeo & Juliet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Romeo & Juliet essays

  1. Compare Baz Luhrmann's version of the Shakespeare classic 'Romeo and Juliet' with the original ...

    While 'the boys' are being introduced music is playing which repeats the words the boys. Signs are shown while they drive up to the station showing major business rivals, rivals just like the Montagues and the Capulets. When they pull in I noticed that their number plate was MON 005, which is a form of identification for them.

  2. Analysis and comparison of the presentation of the prologue in film version of 'Romeo ...

    to the city by this one disaster brought up because of the hate between the Capulets and the Montagues. The disaster is emphasised in this rapid succession of clips, to stress how much damage can be caused by one incident done by the two families.

  1. How did Shakespeare create tension in act 1 scene 5 of Romeo and Juliet

    (act 1 scene 5)This was used lot in Shakespeare plays. What also added to the tension is that the ball has been set up for the announcement of pairs proposing to Juliet "LADY CAPULET: marry, that 'marry' is the very theme I came to talk of.

  2. Comparison of Franco Zefferelli's Romeo and Juliet to The adaptation by Baz Luhrmann

    the gun belongs to and the resemblances it has to a sword. Once the fight begins a close up shot is given on Tibot and Romeo's cousin's eyes. Then the camera does jump shots of the fight, it jumps between the fight and a large yellow sign warning people of petrol and fire.

  1. Compare the opening of Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrman

    There is then a long shot of the big crowd to show the extent of the violence. In conclusion, they are both effective and successful in appealing to their target audiences. I think that Baz Luhrmann appealed to his teenage audience well, and I think he achieved his goal, as he made it fast and it was action packed.

  2. Compare and contrast the opening sequence of the Luhrman and Zeffirelli film versions of ...

    So therefore the Baz Luhrmann version is a lot easier for us to relate to and understand. When I watched the Zeffirelli version the language and costumes just did not appeal to me. The Zeffirelli version made me feel like I was in the 1800s.

  1. Contrasts between Zeffirelli and Luhrmann's

    The Acting quality was good in both films, but I found the style in the early 1967 version was boring and the fight scenes were slightly unbelievable. The 1997 version was more exciting and kept u interested but there wasn't really much between the two films in the quality of acting.

  2. Explore how Baz Luhrmann, the director of "Romeo and Juliet", has produced an exciting ...

    Abra Capulet walks up and the camera zooms out showing his surroundings in a petrol station, he says in a calm and polite manor, "Do you bite your thumb at us sir?" to the viewer they without needing to know the meaning of the phrase can tell it is a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work