The purpose of dystopian literature is to dehumanize the individual To what extent do the novels Nineteen Eighty Four and the Road support or refute this view?

Authors Avatar

English Literature Coursework Draft                                                        Words – 2013        

Jessica-Sue Shawcross

Mr. Newman

‘The purpose of dystopian literature is to dehumanize the individual’

To what extent do the novels Nineteen Eighty Four and the Road support or refute

this view?

The dystopian novels The Road and Nineteen Eighty Four demonstrate the push and pull between the utopian and dystopian societies in their narratives. Dystopian literature often seems to be a deterrent to the reader the nightmarish lifestyles presented to us by each individual protagonist characters dehumanized due to the desolate and barren lifestyles presented in each text.  However, despite this, the bleak settings seem to send messages of optimism, and to some extent hope, through the interactions of characters in each novel.

In The Road the boy and the father are seen to be two people left who are not dehumanized by the new apocalyptic society. They do not conform to cannibalism, rape or murder; however their humanity is tested through the desolate landscapes and their lack of human contact and refusal to help those they do meet in this new society. Although the father only has the boy his humanity is clear as they are "each other worlds entire" showing he only lives for his son. We can also see the boy knows that without his father he would not be able to defend for himself and would be lonely.  When the father asks him "what would you do if I died" the son replies "if you died I would want to die too/....so I could be with you" This love between the boy and the father allows us to over look the apparent loneliness the boy has, with the humanity between the two characters shining through. Conflict does exist between the father and the son, when they have different opinions on whether to help fellow survivors or not, yet the conflict itself is not destructive as they always come to a joint decision. Jon Wilkins. Theoretical evolutionary biologist and professor at Santa Fe Institute believe the son and the father “are two individuals with separate wills but their paths and fates are inseparable”.

McCarthy makes use of graphology, or rather a lack of it, to show how desolate and dehumanized life has become, or perhaps draws attention to the things in life that really matter when characters are travelling a dystopian landscape. The setting is said to be sublime.  To expand the point, the author’s use of declarative sentences makes his prose bleak, and certainly positions the reader in such a way as to be able to empathise with the stark sense of grim reality that the man and boy are confronted with.  McCarthy’s own remark that he sees no need to “blot up the page with weird little marks” using as little punctuation as possible, enables him to present a narrative whose prose is as scarce and unwelcoming as the actual highway itself. These sorts of structural decisions on the writer’s part add to the sense of inhumanity in The Road but ironically also contribute to the closeness of the relationship between the father and son – although the narrative may appear to lack conventional direction the relationship between the two characters certainly does not.

Join now!

Another way in which the human spirit seems to be alive in McCarthy’s dystopian landscape lies in the absurd nature of the world that is presented.  The father and son must “keep walking to survive”, despite the fact that where they are walking to or from is not always clear.  As a result their efforts often seem pointless given the inevitability of their death at the hands of roaming bands of cannibals.  However, what is clear is that they repeat the same routine every day, drawing parallels to the absurdity of life – this alludes to thee Greek Mythology ...

This is a preview of the whole essay