The role of the Hero in American literature changes depending on internal and external pressure on America at any given time. During the 1930's the hero was a lone man

Authors Avatar by dunbal (student)

The role of the american hero in american litreture

The hero as defined in the terms of a narrative is for the most part the catalyst that moves a story forward into a three act structure. Equilibrium, Conflict, Resolution. What is particular interesting in the context of American literature is the relationship that the Hero has to events outside the sphere of the piece of fiction it belongs to. In America, times change very quickly and this is reflected in the Literature, movies and theatre of the decade. By examining the quality's that the hero excerpts on the world around him or in the way the world around him excerpts itself on our hero, we can see the state of the current homogony and social norms. So by looking at how the hero plays his/her part in novels from each decade we see what characteristics and prevailing attitudes are there in the current social train of thought. This is useful to see the evolution of North America not only internally but how it relates to crisis externally i.e. the threat of communism, the great depression and the growing anti authoritan feelings that grew in the 1960's.

The hero in times of international crisis will be in line with the government. In the cold war during the threat that Russia presented to the united states we see a resurgence of the "superhero" a force to be reckoned with,  fighting on the behalf of the American ideals. While in the 1930's we see the hero as a man fighting against "the man". This I feel is because America is more internally focused. The great depression had left many people without money and without a source to gain money and so the hero was someone who turned their backs on societies norms and went (usually west) to find a better life. This is most evident in the cowboy novels and movies that were abundant at the time. During the Vietnam war we see a strong anti war movement , the 1960's became a time for sexual empowerment , experimentation, there was a bigger focus on individual freedoms( escape from the draft) and the hero in some books during this time reflects this idea of questioning authority, the idea that the government didn't always know best i.e. Yossarian in Catch 22. So one could argue that the role of the hero is reinforce or question social norms depending on the current social climate within North America.

During the 1960's in America there was a huge boom in anti government feeling. The Vietnam war was in full swing and the Hippies were becoming a movement in their own right. The phrase "make love not war" comes from this decade and best describes the feeling of the young people at the time. Catch 22 by Joseph Heller although written in the late 50's was first published in the early 60's. It was an experimental novel in regards to narrative swapping the time line around in places. The story revolves around Yossarian and his involvement during World War 2 as a bombardier in a B-52 flying missions over Italy. Most Americans believed that World war 2 was a just war. Americans fought for good. Germans for the bad.  Black and white. Case closed. Shut the book. With this was the idea that every American service man and women served with bravery and honour and never questioned why they were there and faced the possibility of death with dignity. Yossarian questioned his motives for being there every time he got a chance. He also actively tried to get out of doing his job consistently and with great vigour and faced with the idea of death with fear, bordering on terror.

Join now!

""History did not demand Yossarian's premature demise, justice could be satisfied without it, progress did not hinge upon it, victory did not depend on it. That men would die was a matter of necessity; which men would die, though, was a matter of circumstance, and Yossarian was willing to be the victim of anything but circumstance. But that was war. "men would die, though, was a matter of circumstance, and Yossarian was willing to be the victim of anything but circumstance. But that was war."

Yossarian as a character is deeply flawed one, but he is the main protagonist that ...

This is a preview of the whole essay