• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Theories Of Language Development - Chomsky and Skinner

Extracts from this document...


Theories Of Language Development 10/10/03 Skinner Vs Chomsky Emma Smith Many psychologists have studied and researched into how we acquire language. Some have concluded that the ability to learn language is a genetically inherited skill. Others believe that language is learnt following birth and is due to environmental factors. This is part of the nature vs. nurture debate. One of the main psychologists who supported the nurture side was B.F Skinner. Skinner is an empiricist. He put forward the idea that children learn language because of the influence of the environment. Skinner believed that parents would provide more attention and pleasurable reactions when the infant made correct sounds or utterances. This way the child would gradually learn to speak and use language. The child would respond to the smiles and approval of the parents. Skinner explained this as operant conditioning; the reinforcement of a random response by a reward. By trial and error the child would learn to communicate. The child would repeat verbal behaviour that was rewarded and drop sounds or speech that did not work in terms of getting a pleasurable response. This is selective reinforcement. Pavlov and his dogs were and excellent example of operant conditioning. Pavlov rang a bell when it was time for the dogs to eat; eventually the dogs associated the bell with food. Each time the bell rang the dogs salivated. ...read more.


is proved to be a very successful form of teaching. Speech is simplified and clarified through tone, pace and pitch. Rhymes are also used to draw attention to and provide interest in word. For example "Doggy-woggy". Although this is more the input and social approach and is not quite what skinner had in mind, it does support the idea that environmental factors are important to language acquisition and development. * A psychologist called Rheingold found that a programme of reinforcement and non-reinforcement of three-month-old babblers affected the frequency of their vocalisations. * The learning theory also explains the acquisition of the meaning of words. Criticisms Against Skinner's Theory Very few people now believe that Skinner's learning theory completely explains how language is leaned. Therefore there is no surprise that the theory was widely criticised and just like any other theory developed some cracks. * Evidence from observational studies does not support Skinner's theory. Children seem to be able to learn and understand grammar despite the exposure to incorrect grammatical sentences. * Brown found that parents do not correct or reinforce grammar, but respond more to the truth of sentences. For Example, if the child says "he a girl" the mother would reply "Yes. That's a girl". * Trial and error learning cannot explain the rapid acquisition of language and the huge overall language comprehension that young children learn. ...read more.


* Learning has to play a role in correcting errors (such as "goed"). Chomsky's theory ignores the active role of parents in teaching language to their children. * The case of Genie provides mixed evidence for the role of innate language acquisition abilities, but does seem to encounter the idea of a critical time period (also known as the sensitive period) for acquisition as proposed by Lenneburg. Genie was deprived of proper verbal stimulation for thirteen years because she had been locked in a room away from human contact since birth. Although she was able to learn language she never developed completely normal linguistic abilities. This implies that humans have a sensitive period for normal language acquisition early in life. * Sachs reported the case of Jim, whose parents deaf but who was surrounded by spoken language from the television and radio in the hope that he would learn normal language. Jim showed no signs of learning language until a speech therapist took up his case at the age of three. Without the human interaction with the speech therapist there was no sign that Jim would have learned to speak. He needed the interaction before his language ability could develop. * If language development was innate, surely it would develop soon after we are able to control our voices, which is soon after one year of age. It does not explain why language takes a few years to develop. * Chomsky's theory also doesn't explain why there are such large variations in the rate children learn language. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Investigating how language has changed in children's literature; in relation to interaction between ...

    5 star(s)

    One aspect that can be seen to change chronologically is the choice of words, and those which are now deemed archaic. The extract from Tom Brown's School days, contains more advanced lexis, and much more accentuated syntax and sentence structure, 'interrupted the Doctor, as the pitiful condition of "East's" garments was fully revealed to him.'

  2. Critically evaluate one theory of language development. Chomsky argues that language is a formal ...

    to make a word plural add 's') and finally tests these newly formed words by using them in spontaneous speech. These words are the either rejected or accepted. This theory can be applied to any language and will acquire the grammar of that language. Fowler and Swenson (1979, in Gross, 1999)

  1. Innatist and Interactionist theories and their teaching implications

    Hatch (1992) and Michael Long (1983) believe that much second language acquisition takes place through conversational interaction. Long agrees with Krashen that input at a right level is important for language acquisition. Despite of this similarity with the innatist theory, interactionist focuses more on analyzing the input given in order to acquire is successfully.

  2. Investigation into Gender Differences in the Language of Personal Profiles on Dating Websites

    Prefer heat to cold. Love France and Italy, people watching, sightseeing and chilling out in the shade. favorite things: Love to read, listen to music and getting together with friends. I like to shop and enjoy nice things. Togetherness/sharing is great! Enjoy crosswords and sudoku. Would love to be able to dance properly ...

  1. Describe and discuss the Nativist and Behaviour theories of language acquisition, using examples to ...

    Noam Chomsky a linguist believes that all languages have the same basic grammatical features such as consonants, vowels, syllables, nouns and verbs irrespective of the final language the child will learn. This is known as linguistic universal. Nativist's believe all children are born with a Language Acquisition Device (LAD)

  2. Language development in exceptional circumstances: Auditory Impairment

    Development of a full language can only occur where children are provided with some input. 90% deaf children born to hearing parents and therefore not exposed to sign language in their early lives. The 'Oralist' approach was often implemented, and it was thought by exposing deaf children to an oral

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work