• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Through Victors narrative in Volume 1, what social comments about parentage and responsibility is Shelley making?

Extracts from this document...


Through Victor?s narrative in Volume 1, what social comments about parentage and responsibility is Shelly making? Victor?s narrative within volume one provides indication of the suggestively flawed upbringing by his parents that serves to contribute to his later extreme egotism in his quest to defy nature. Reminiscent of Shelly?s own childhood, Victor creates the monster that he fatally chooses to abandon, seized by the fear of his creation?s ?abhorrent? features. Shelly comments Victor?s responsibility as a ?parent? to the monster, while also noting the later implications of Victor choosing to ultimately abandon the creature as it returns to haunt him. Victor ultimately bears the brunt of his excessive thirst for knowledge, in which he ultimately usurps the role of women and God in his creation. Initially the reader is presented with Shelly?s social comments on the two extremes of parenting; unlike her own parents, Frankenstein?s own parents are surprisingly amicable in feeling sympathy for the orphan Elizabeth who they later choose to adopt. Elizabeth is simply presented to Victor by his mother as ?a pretty present? for him to keep, and we see the result of this in Victor?s possessive, and possibly obsessive nature: ?My more than sister, since till death she was to be mine only?. ...read more.


parallels to the Gothic genre; Victor, sitting in his dark, dingy laboratory of ?filthy creation? succumbs to the horror of his creation, despite the supposed beauty of features while constructing the creature. It is therefore ironic that despite his parents? own benevolence and Victor?s virtually ?perfect? upbringing that he chooses to abandon his own creation. His motives for creating the monster are also questionable; the over-protectiveness of his father is revealed in its full extent when he comments on how precautions had been made that his mind ?should be impressed with no supernatural horrors?, yet only leading to a much greater thirst for knowledge and possibly power. Victor comments that ?a new species? would therefore ?bless (him) as its creator and source?. Frankenstein?s intentions on creating the new being shows a lapse in judgement, as he earnestly believes that his creation would lead to ?many happy and excellent natures? who would express ?gratitude? to him, similarly to his own picturesque childhood where he expressed the same gratitude for his parents, who would irresponsibly return to him a much further drive for knowledge and contribute to his belief of his own indestructability. Lack of adequate parental judgement is clearly part of Shelly?s commentary within the text, and Victor?s own narration in the ?conception? of the monster serves to prove this: Victor believes that the monster had ...read more.


Thus Shelly comments on the possibility of events to come should man hold the key to the secrets of life, and the ultimate consequences of humanity choosing to do so. We can see Victor as challenging the traditional role of ?scientists?, instead of simply observing and proving theories, he aims to challenge them and become a creationist for his own intentions, foregoing responsibility for his actions. Victor?s narrative within Volume One serves as a parallel to Shelly?s own dysfunctional family, where Frankenstein is ironically brought up with much benevolence, yet with a constant dark undertone and foreshadowing nature. Victor can be seen as attempting to avoid responsibility, in which he implicates his father for not deterring him enough from his scientific voyage as being the reasons for the later deaths and destruction that ensues, while Shelly also comments on the question of the extent of parental responsibility: Victor feels immense guilt over his creation, yet possibly for the wrong reasons; he shows no remorse in abandoning the near helpless creature yet suffers intensely as he witnesses the deaths of the closest people to him. Ultimately, Shelly raises the question of the purpose of mankind, and whether it is justifiable for man to hold the keys to the secrets of nature, as well as the responsibility of parents for their children and their actions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Mary Shelly section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Mary Shelly essays

  1. Who is the real monster in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein

    Nature is paradoxical and its behaviour changes analogously to the creature's feelings. Also, another incident emphasises that monstrosity had not yet taken over the creature. As it walked along a river ' a young girl came running towards (it),

  2. [The] juxtaposition of the ghastly and the everyday suggests one of the defining characteristics ...

    The innocent and the guilty is a contrast used in both the foreground and the background of the novel. In the foreground we have the death of innocents at the hands of the guilty; the deaths of William, Henry, and Elizabeth.

  1. In Frankenstein(TM) it is generally accepted that the female characters and their values are ...

    theme, or the female characters themselves could represent Mary Shelley since all have survival and strength ingrained in their character. Despite her strength and position in the family, Elizabeth is viewed as a possession of Victors. '...I, with childish seriousness, interpreted her words literally and looked upon Elizabeth as mine - mine to protect, love, and cherish.

  2. Frankenstein contrasts his 'thirst for knowledge' with Elizabeth's interest in 'the aerial creations of ...

    Waldman. In the book, Shelley repeatedly depicts M. Waldman character as evil by using undignified terms, even when his intentions were good. Victor Frankenstein, the modern Prometheus, ruled against the gradual evolutionary processes of nature so well described by Darwin. Rather than letting organic life-forms evolve slowly over thousands of years according to natural processes of sexual selection,

  1. comparison, victor and monster

    The creature is very kind-hearted, loving and somehow also loveable, if given the thought. In comparison to the creature's character, one may well say that Victor's physical appearance may not be as attractive as he seems to be an outcast in this world.

  2. How does Shelly portray the creature through her narrative?

    Lacy?s can be seen as the trigger cause for the Creatures evilness, and eventually the destruction of his and Victor?s happiness. The upbringing of Victor and the Creature are different, furthermore emphasising nurture over nature, shown by their narrative. Victor?s childhood is filled with love from his mother and father,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work