To what extent and in what ways is Fitzgerald purely critical of Gatsby?

Authors Avatar

Laura Clark 12EM                                                                                                   March 2009

To what extent and in what ways is Fitzgerald purely critical of Gatsby’s dreams?

        Dreams are a large part of “The Great Gatsby”, both in the wider sense and in terms of individuals, and Gatsby is the character whose dream is focussed on the most. It is difficult to tell what Fitzgerald truly thinks, due to the fact that he uses Nick as the narrator – meaning the reader finds it hard to separate their feelings. However, by looking at how he presents the characters in the novel, and the society as a whole, we can perhaps see what Fitzgerald thinks about Gatsby’s dreams in the novel. Fitzgerald’s views are presented ambiguously in the novel, with the comparison to the rest of society being the main point against the title views, and the presentation of Daisy and materialism perhaps being the main arguments to support the statement in the title.

        One way in which Fitzgerald shows his views to the reader is in his presentation of Gatsby’s dream itself, otherwise known as Daisy. From the beginning of the novel, she is presented by Fitzgerald as a rather annoying, simple character who seems to have very few redeeming qualities about her other than her looks. From her simple and repeated dialogue “Do you always watch for the longest day of the year and then miss it? I always watch for the longest day of the year and then miss it”, the reader is made to feel that Daisy has very little substance to her character, with the exception of her “low, thrilling” voice. Despite the reader having a screen in front of Fitzgerald’s viewpoint in terms of Nick as the narrator, who clearly Fitzgerald intends to show as somewhat drawn to Daisy, we are still able to see that the only characteristics of Daisy’s that are praised seem to be superficial. Therefore, when we are told that this woman has been Gatsby’s dream and who he has built his life around for the past five years, it perhaps makes us question whether Fitzgerald is trying to portray Daisy as worthwhile of this dedication. This doubt arises I feel that if Fitzgerald was applauding Gatsby’s dream of Daisy, he perhaps may have presented her as a more likeable, intelligent character with qualities that could easily be admired universally. As a result of this portrayal of Daisy, I believe it shows Fitzgerald to be mainly critical of Gatsby and his dream. However, this could depend on the era that the individual is based in – readers today could find Daisy as more of an annoyance due to the change in women’s roles, in that today women are far more independent and take far more responsibility than they did in the 1920’s. Daisy’s apparent simple nature may therefore annoy modern readers more than in the past as we are less able to understand that this was how women were expected to be in the 1920’s. Nevertheless, even taking these time changes into account I believe that Fitzgerald still intended Daisy to appear perhaps lacking in typical good qualities to highlight a potential point about Gatsby’s dream.

Join now!

        However, Daisy’s apparent lack of appeal as a character could be used by Fitzgerald to portray Gatsby’s dream in a better light, if we look from the angle of his loyalty to Daisy. The way that Gatsby has stayed so faithful and loyal to his dream to be with Daisy, despite (in our eyes) the fact that she is not worth it, could show that Fitzgerald is praising his dream as a cause of this admirable quality in Gatsby’s character. This would go against the statement that Fitzgerald is purely critical of his dreams, as it would imply that they ...

This is a preview of the whole essay