• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was poor leadership responsible for massive loss of life, and stalemate on the Western Front 1914 - 1918?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was poor leadership responsible for massive loss of life, and stalemate on the Western Front 1914 - 1918? Poor leadership, throughout World War One was one of main causes, of such large losses of life. Better planning and a careful delivery of instructions would more than likely have resulted in higher success and the loss of fewer men. Generals and commanders sat in their country mansions in arrogance, far from the front lines planning endless attacks with hardly any regard for human life. Commander Robson wrote, 'Wiring parties worked though the nights while raiders tried to cut gaps - these gaps then showed the enemy where an attack would have come.' The evidence speaks for itself. It seems that leadership, poor or not was crucial on and off the battle field, and those who were wealthy and could buy their positions, leading positions at that, should not have been allowed to do so when the lives of other men were at stake. Stalemate was the bane of all commanders that fought on the Western Front throughout the duration of the First World War; the taking of little ground, and the loss of many good men. The most famous example was the Western Front, where Germany planned at first to take out France before Russia could strike, but all did not go as they planned. The Russians managed to mobilise a large enough army, quick enough to strike Germany when she least expected it, and as a result many troops that were going to be used for the infamous Shlieffen Plan, had to be diverted back to the east to defend against the ever advancing Russians. ...read more.


Poor leadership resulted in the war being so prolonged; by November the winter began to creep up on the lines and all the operations literally became bogged down, and the war of rapid movement originally planned by the generals, had turned into a slogging match between each of the sides of entrenched armies, and the lines moved very little from then on. Factors such as the weather should have been taken into account when the war was being planned. A combination of the sheer drop in temperatures and the wet muddy conditions resulted in the death of some soldiers not out on the battle fields, but in what was seen as their homes, the trenches. Ignorantly commanders wrongly predicted that the war that was to last for years would be over in a matter of months, they told all the men they would be home by Christmas. It can be argued that poor leadership lost the Germans the war, not troops, or lack of morale, towards the end of the war anyhow, although they were contributing factors. The Germans made a decisive decision in 1918, the commander at the time Ludendorff chose to throw all the available troops into battle on the Western Front in an attempt for one last victory. For four months Ludendorff struck without respite at all different section of the front, but one by one the attacks were repelled by the British, French and American troops, with the Germans taking heavy casualties. ...read more.


This instruction to go over to an enemy trench in such a fashion was folly; after all did Haig really think his bombardment would have killed all the Germans, or that they had simply run away? This 'poor' leadership to say the least, was a clear example of the extent of poor leadership that was responsible for massive loss of life, and stalemate on the Western Front. However, the commanders of the Western Front must not entirely discredited for their efforts, they did eventually manage to break the stalemate. During the last few months of the war in 1918, a war of movement began once more. The introduction of the tank by the British finally rendered the trench lines penetrable, and increased usage of aeroplanes not only made small scale bombings possible on open trench lines, but also allowed more accurate reconnaissance and intelligence gathering. In conclusion, leadership was vital in a war of such a scale. It should be undertaken by high ranking, experienced, and intelligent people. This was not always the case, and when mistakes occur the effects are usually worse than expected in situations such as war. Leadership was to a large extent to blame, although not entirely, for the large needless losses of life, and stalemate on the Western Front 1914 - 1918. Attacks should be planned very carefully, with every aspect and possibility taken into account, as we saw with the German commanders of the Shlieffen plan who did not expect the Russians to mobilise so quickly. Poor leadership, means poor results clearly proven on countless occasions such as the Somme and the defence of Ypres. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. 'Lions Led by Donkeys'. How valid is this interpretation of the conduct of British ...

    so he could base his articles using a bigger view of the war. Many people say that the Generals needed to be away from the battlefield. There was no point them being at the front because they would not be able to get a wider picture of what was actually going on.

  2. The Battle of the Somme 1916

    But it could also mean that there was no-one better than him for the job, he was the best man. If someone else had led the army, maybe it could have been a whole lot worse! The death rates might have been higher and the objectives might not have been achieved.

  1. How Was The Stalemate Finally Broken?From Christmas 1914 until March 1918 there had been ...

    This caused mass panic as the soldiers tried to get away from the gas whilst watching there friends choke and try to breath. After this both sides started using gas against each other. At first it was used to distract the enemy so the infantry could charge the enemy trenches.

  2. Were the British Generals like Sir Douglas Haig responsible for the high casualty figures?

    This quote shows us that the British soldiers were ordered to walk in waves towards the German trenches. Rosemary Rees wrote this quote. More quotes, which suggest that the British walked to the German trenches, are 'It was the senselessness of sending up to eight waves if heavily laden men across open ground'.

  1. The development of a Stalemate

    All three commanders were men in their 60s. They made decisions at headquarters far from where the fighting was taking place, (which effected their judgement) often on old or inaccurate information. Because of the military leader's tactics it meant that the war would go on longer. So in theory if the military leaders had been slightly more efficient

  2. To What Extent Was Poor Military Leadership Responsible For The Massive Loss Of Life ...

    The machine gun was the weapon that changed the face of war. Previously an attack would have to be defended by many men, each with one non-automatic rifle. With the invention of the machine gun this all changed. It took a mere two men; one to feed the ammunition, the other to aim and fire.

  1. Why is it so difficult to know what soldiers thought? ...

    This was how he described them this was sometimes all that they would get to eat in the trenches. Also in some of the letters home they wouldn't tell their parents how bad it was to live in the trenches so they would self censor the letter cos they wouldn't want their parents to worry.

  2. What Was Life Really Like In The Trenches On The Western Front

    But a manual brought out by the British Army suggested that the dugouts should be between two ft. and four ft. six inches. Wide and that they should be covered by corrugated iron or brushwood, then covered with a minimum amount of nine inches deep of earth.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work