• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent would you agree that Hamlet and Laertes are presented as parallel characters within the context of a revenge tragedy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Will Taylor 12G1 December 2002 Towards the end of the play, Hamlet comments: "But I am very sorry, good Horatio, That to Laertes I forgot myself. For by the image of my cause I see The portraiture of his." To what extent would you agree that Hamlet and Laertes are presented as parallel characters within the context of a revenge tragedy? Traditionally, the avenger in the context of a revenge tragedy, disregards all codes of honour in pursuing their goal of natural justice. Hamlet clearly deviates from the classic revenge tragedy conventions due to the presence of multiple revenge plots. The two characters in question, are seen to differ in their conformity with the traditional concept of an avenger in a revenge tragedy. Hamlet is portrayed as an unconventional avenger, whereas Laertes conforms more to typical conventions of an avenger in a revenge tragedy. Hamlet and Laertes are portrayed as parallel characters in the respect that they are both used by Claudius, who capitalises on their weak, emotional state with revenge solely on their minds. Claudius does not wish to kill Hamlet himself because "The Queen his mother/Lives almost by his looks" meaning that the Queen and Hamlet are very close and Claudius would not wish to inflict pain upon Queen Gertrude. The King exploits Laertes' impulsive nature, and encourages him to act upon his honour and seek revenge against Hamlet. ...read more.

Middle

In Elizabethan times, in the renaissance period, people became sceptical of the chivalric code and began to doubt its importance in society. Laertes would have been tought that justice and defence were two important aspects of the code and so it would be natural to him to bring Hamlet to justice, and defend his father's name. In contrast, Hamlet, on learning of his father's murder is asked by the ghost of his father to revenge the death. He is hesitant and procrastinates, wishing he had not been asked to complete such a task, "the time is out of joint. O cursed spite, that ever I was born to set it right!" Hamlet defies convention in the manner that he shuns his inherited role as an avenger, but is unable to avoid the reality that it is his destiny. He has lived his life as a scholar, going through university, with student friends such as Guildenstern and Rosencrantz, being trained in thought, giving him the ability to rationalise. However, he disregards this in his second soliloquy where he claims, "...from the table of my memory I'll wipe away all trivial fond records, All saws of books, all forms, all pressures past That youth and observation copied there, And thy commandment all alone shall live Within the book and volume of my brain..." ...read more.

Conclusion

Claudius suggests that Hamlet has a particularly strong unspoken bond with his mother, stating "The queen his mother/Lives almost by his looks" In the Laurence Olivier interpretation of Hamlet, the opening line states ''this is the tragedy of a man who could not make up his mind''. The reason for Hamlet's procrastination is complex. He wishes to gain honour by avenging his father's death, but is doubting and undecided of his abilities to do what he has been instructed to do by the Ghost of Hamlet. Hamlet is apprehensive and agonizes over what he is to do, and how he is going to avenge the murder of his father. In sharp contrast, Laertes' actions are impulsive. However, despite the impulsive actions of Laertes in challenging a duel with Hamlet, Laertes is does not possess the cruelty and spitefulness that his opposition does. Hamlet not only wants to avenge his father's death, he wishes Claudius to be eternally punished, just like the Old King Hamlet who is being tortured in purgatory. Therefore, Hamlet does not kill Claudius in the scene where Claudius is praying, when there is a chance Claudius might be confessing his sins. Laertes wants revenge, but he is not concerned with punishment, he is concerned with physical and the present. Hamlet however, cares about Claudius' afterlife. Hamlet and Laertes the two extremes of the act of revenge: Hamlet thinks reason before action. Laertes acts on impulsion and without reasoning. Revenge was the driving force behind both characters' actions and it led to their eventual down fall. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hamlet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hamlet essays

  1. Compare and Contrast theCharacters Hamlet and Laertes.

    Hamlet here has proven to be the better character as he accepts Laertes' apology and forgives him. In his anger and rage Hamlet leaps up and goes straight up to Claudius and puts an end to Claudius' reign once and for all.

  2. Compare and contrast the approaches of Hamlet and Laertes to revenge

    "Let come what comes" (Laertes Act iv Scene v) "mine is ready, now or whensoever" (Hamlet Act v Scene ii)

  1. Scene by Scene - Hamlet.

    He tries to pray. We get to listen. If this were a contemporary action movie (today's "revenge plays"), we would simply hate the bad guy and wait for him to get his just deserts in the end. By giving Claudius real substance and depth, Shakespeare has at once imitated life, increased Hamlet's own stature by giving him an

  2. Free essay

    Hamlet - Historical and Political Context

    promise to royalty contained in the suggestion at the end of the play that strong and humane rule will be reasserted.

  1. Comparing the revengers Fortinbras, Laertes and Hamlet.

    The sight of Fortinbras' determination to go against the Polish army for the honour of gaining such a small and trivial piece of land makes Hamlet annoyed with himself. After all, he is avenging the murder of his father and the disgracing of his mothers' name, something much more important

  2. To what extent is 'Hamlet' principally a revenge tragedy?

    It becomes evident through Hamlet's soliloquies that his character is not meant to be perceived as a warrior or traditional avenger, but rather as a philosopher. His fatal flaw, which leads to his delay in killing Claudius, and therefore the unnecessary deaths of himself and many others, is his 'craven scruple of thinking too precisely on th'event' (4.4.39).

  1. How does Shakespeare present and use the characters of Laertes and Fortinbras to compare ...

    / A beast, no more." However, Laertes actions prove not much better, as they are rash, based on extreme anger and Claudius easily draws him into corruption "My Lord I will be ruled." Contrasted with this, Fortinbras is seen as a man of reason; he sticks fast to his plan

  2. Criticism on Hamlet

    of, and moralizing on, the Danish custom of wassailing: he runs off from the particular to the universal, and, in his repugnance to personal and individual concerns, escapes, as it were, from himself in generalizations, and smothers the impatience and uneasy feelings of the moment in abstract reasoning.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work