• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using at least 2 sources and your own knowledge, explain why it is possible to describe the fighting on the Western front as a 'war of attrition'

Extracts from this document...


Using at least 2 sources and your own knowledge, explain why it is possible to describe the fighting on the Western front as a 'war of attrition' By Dylan Harapoff The strategy and tactics that were employed on the Western Front are often describe as, 'attrition'; the need to put one's whole human and mechanical resources to wear down the enemy. The Fighting on the western front consisted of advanced technological warfare that relied heavily upon artillery, machine guns, tanks and gas, which characterises a 'war of attrition'. Source 19.J indicates the importance of firepower in winning battles whilst source 19.K further compliments the idea of a 'war of attrition' by depicting the emphasis placed upon tanks despite their apparent initial failure. The western front was too represented by the common held and often out-dated belief that numerical manpower would prove to be the determining factor in victory. Both source 19.L and source 19.K explore the perceptible need of numbers initiated by officers clearly evident by the persistent of sending troops in 'line by line' at the Somme in 1916, during the peak of the 'war of attrition' in the belief that the sheer mass of resources would destroy the enemy. ...read more.


The Somme, for example produced 60000 British casualties during its first day, which accumulated to a total of over a million casualties by its end in November 1916. The immense destruction caused by the power of new technology indicating another testament to the war of attrition as Source 19.J explores the German perspective through general Sixt Von Armin who felt the repercussions of the strength in artillery. He states, "...the casualties were so great before the enemy's attack was launched, that the possibility of the front line repulsing the attack was very doubtful" which corresponds directly to the nature of the fighting being characterised as a 'war of attrition' as the effect of the methodical artillery is portrayed but more importantly so is the emphasis given to this nature of fighting by each of the generals. The nature of the Western Front in its unconscious belief than superiority in men held the key further acknowledges the idea of a 'war of Attrition". During the Battle of the Somme, British Generals gave orders that men would only need to walk across no-man's land as when they were to reach the German trenches there wouldn't be one ...read more.


Likewise Source 19.K pictures a number of soldiers that were needed to provide assistance to a tank again outlining the demands placed upon troops in the 'war of attrition'. The nature of the fighting at the western front can also be represented as a 'war of attrition' due to the changing face of war through total war. Many of the soldiers were often supported through economic and social means particularly enforced by government regulations in order to benefit the front with material assets that could be inturn utilised in the war of attrition. The fighting consisted of an abundance of shells and ammunitions where, "more shells were fired one day at the Somme than over the whole Franco-Prussian War. The only means for this was through the coordination of an intense home campaign in the munitions industry allowing the nature of the fighting to resemble a 'war of attrition'. Furthermore the development of tactics such as the introduction of creeping barrages, in-depth defence, tanks and gas complimented the home front campaign creating a 'war of attrition'. General Sixt von Armin acknowledges the impact of attrition into the development of in-depth tactics to create limit losses and aid the firepower. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    and "Heroes all!" these phrases show an uplifting morale for the public at home and showing a good confidence in order for supporting. The paragraph was published to boost self-esteem and justify going over the top. In the extract the Germans are referred to as "cowardly Huns", this shows the

  2. The Battle of the Somme 1916 - source related study.

    These men on the ground could either be wounded or dead, but it is more likely that that they are dead, due to the crosses that have been lain on top of some of the bodies. Also, the area behind the four soldiers seems to be like a desolate wasteland,

  1. The year 1916 was the year of the Battle of the Somme.

    This way, there would be more supporters for the war. Although Source D is useful in answering the question, Source D is not really objective; it shows the allies doing God's work for him. The lines, "Line after line pressed on, shooting, bayoneting and capturing the enemy".

  2. The Battle of the Somme 1916

    The writer mentions other countries: ''As ever the Australians and New Zealanders were to the fore.'' This must be because the book is for ''boys and girls of the Empire''. This includes Australia and New Zealand and since it was in the interest of the government to gather support for the war all over the Empire, this would have helped.

  1. "Poems and stories; official accounts. Which of these give a more accurate picture of ...

    would not tell with such high zest To children ardent for some desperate glory, The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori. This poem was written by Wilfred Owen, who by the end of the war was strongly opposed war, writing in his poetry anthology, "This book is

  2. The war on the western front.

    Both Sources contain factual evidence even tough Source A is vague as it doesn't give us exact figures. This cause's me to disagree with the above statement as I believe there as reliable as each other. 2. Source C was written by Siegfried Sassoon and the source is the form of poetry.

  1. The war on the Western Front

    Craig Mair makes his statement because of the casualties on the 1st of July 1916. The British suffered 60,000 casualties 20,000 and more of these were deaths. Mair has produced his textbook passage by putting forward a number of primary and secondary sources.

  2. Were the British Generals like Sir Douglas Haig responsible for the high casualty figures?

    These quote are reliable because its more than one persons opinion and they both say the same thing. These mistakes had a massive affect on July 1st. these mistakes cost thousands of men their lives. The bombardment cost many lives.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work