Using two of Heaney's poems, compare them for treatment of theme and style, noting signs of the poet's development.

Authors Avatar

Rebecca Brackley

Using two of Heaney’s poems, compare them for treatment of theme and style, noting signs of the poet’s development.

Seamus Heaney has developed greatly as a writer from his first collection of poetry, Death of a Naturalist, to his collection further on, Wintering out.  I am going to examine the poems, Death of a naturalist and The Tollund man, to explore how Heaney’s poetry has developed in style and themes.

Firstly, from looking at Death of a Naturalist, Heaney clearly establishes the themes that he develops in this collection of poems.  He firstly talks about his own personal history, and then uses memories from his own childhood.  Heaney paints vivid descriptions of his memories or rural Irish life, and uses language as he describes how the “Bubbles gargled delicately”.  This onomatopoeia is seen once again, as he recalls the “coarse croaking” of the “gross-bellied frogs”.

There is also the strong theme of Irish landscapes and traditions, which is an ongoing theme throughout Heaney’s first collection of poetry.  He describes how “All year the flax-dam festered in the heart/Of the townland”, which shows a traditional rural activity that occurred when Heaney was growing up in agricultural Ireland.

Heaney also expresses his loss of innocence through this poem, as he develops knowledge and maturity.  In the first section of the poem the language used is childlike, to show Heaney’s naiveté, such as “jampotfuls”, “slobber”, and “fattening dots”.  This is also continued as Heaney talks about his lessons at school, learning about the “Mammy frog” and “Daddy frog”, and these simple terms are used effectively to show a young Heaneys innocence.  In the second part of the poem, however, there is a change in tone and a realisation for Heaney as he discovers that the “jellied specks” he collects are actually the offspring of the frogs.  This causes Heaney to feel guilty and he then sees the frogs as threatening, and as if ready to attack.  He says they were “poised like mud grenades”, suggesting that the arrival of the frogs is like a military invasion - they are “angry” and invade the dam, and Heaney feels this is due to his naïve crime of stealing the frogspawn.

Join now!

Heaney uses a relatively simple structure in this poem, and it can clearly be split into two sections. In the first section, Heaney describes how the frogs would spawn in the lint hole, and him collecting the spawn.  He also talks of how his teacher encouraged his childish interest in the process. In the second section, Heaney outlines how the frogs, in huge numbers, had taken over the flax-dam, wanting revenge on him, to punish him for his naïve crime.  These two sections show very well how through this experience, a young Heaney grew up and lost some of his ...

This is a preview of the whole essay