• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was there much change in warfare on the Western front between the end of 1914 and March 1918?

Extracts from this document...


GCSE COURSEWORK - AO 2 Following the battle of the Marne and the race to the Sea a trench line was set up from Switzerland to the North Sea. This trench line was in place by the end of 1914. In March 1918 the Germans launched a major attack under the code name "Operation Michael". Was there much change in warfare on the Western front between the end of 1914 and March 1918? Explain your answer. The period of World War One was a time of great change. Transformations occurred in many fields of life, but in other ways many things stayed the same. Technology was greatly improved upon during the course of the war. Aeroplanes, tanks, artillery, gas and machine guns were all created or significantly improved upon. Possibly the biggest advance of these was that of aircraft. Blacks sent over from British colonised Africa were amazed by them, calling them "Steam engines of the air". The plane had only been created eleven years earlier by the Wright brothers and, at the beginning of the war, was still temperamental and deemed of limited use by Commanders. The early machines were weak and fragile and none of the great powers possessed a significant amount of them. They were first used as reconnaissance planes because they were unable to inflict enough damage to major enemy targets to change the course of a battle or campaign. ...read more.


Early in the war, for example at the battle of the Somme - which started July 1916 - artillery was fired for a week beforehand to "destroy" the enemy's fortifications, barbed wire and defending force. But, at 7:30 on the 1st of July, when the guns stopped - the signal for the British to get out of their trenches and walk to the enemy lines - the Germans knew that the attack had begun, and simply crawled from their dug-outs to man their machine gun posts. This problem was averted with the creation of the "creeping barrage" which was used first with the 7 and 18 division on the British XV corps on one area on the first day of the Somme with great success. The idea was that the artillery would fire upon the enemy front line, and then progressively further and further away, with the advancing soldiers close (ideally100m) behind the line of fire. Then when the enemy finally rose from its trench, the British attackers were less than 100 metres from their position. This was, however, tricky because communication was difficult between the attacking force and the artillery commanders, and there was the constant risk of the falling shells blowing-up their own soldiers due to errors, and so very accurate guns were needed. The type, and attitude, of the British army also changed over the course of the war. ...read more.


To illustrate this change is the idea of "punching the line" - created in 1917 - as a compromise to the "Big push". "Punching the line" was when there were a series of little attacks along a large area of the enemy's front line instead of a huge attack on a small area - the idea of pricking a plastic sheet many times with a pin to weaken it, rather than trying to punch your fist through it. This shows a change in strategy from some of the attackers. Unfortunately Haig believed that after many successes from this tactic (e.g. at Messines hill), it was time for another big push to finish the "Huns" off. This led to the massacre at Passchendaele, which shows that the strategy of Commanders didn't change during WW1 due to their outmoded and old-fashioned views on warfare. The last thing that didn't change was the geography of the front. Although attacks won ground in places - creating 'bulges' in the line, the enemy would eventually win it back and a 'salient' would be created. Throughout the war, the trench line writhed like a snake, but mostly stayed in the same position. Overall, there were massive changes in all fields of life during the First World War. Some aspects changed quickly, and some changes took a long time, for example, it took the allies three years to understand what tactics to use against the enemy in the trenches. But, on the other hand, many aspects did not change at all. WORD COUNT: 1,456 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Why was Trench Warfare so terrible

    Shell shock also saw host to a new method of treatment known now as 'Psychiatric treatment'. Everyday life: how terrible were living conditions in the trenches? Everyday life was hard for all soldiers during but war veterans seemed to be able to cope with life much more easily than newcomers.

  2. 'Lions Led by Donkeys'. How valid is this interpretation of the conduct of British ...

    So I believe that the people that appear on the programme would have well researched and justified their opinions. This makes the programme reliable. Another reason why people argue against the interpretation is that letters, poems written by troops at the time, show little bitterness towards the generals.

  1. To what extent was poor leadership responsible for massive loss of life, and stalemate ...

    A witness at the fort of Liege during a German attack wrote, 'The Germans made no attempt at deploying, but came on line after line, almost shoulder to shoulder, until as we shot them down, the fallen were heaped on top of each other in an awful barricade of dead and wounded that threatened to mask our guns.'

  2. The Battle of the Somme 1916

    The tone of the letter is very harsh, mournful, emotional and bitter. This does not in any way support the war. If anything, it would reduce support for the war if read by the public so this source is not useful in helping me to understand why the public supported the war.

  1. In what ways did the attitudes of soldiers and civilians change towards the war ...

    All we lived on was tea and dog biscuits. If we got meat once a week we were lucky, but imagine trying to eat standing in a trench full of water with the smell of dead bodies near by." The British army also recorded a record of complaint letters about rationing, 200,000 in total.

  2. How Was The Stalemate Finally Broken?From Christmas 1914 until March 1918 there had been ...

    At first the only way to protect yourself from gas would be to urinate on a rag then breath through that. After this scientists starting making more potent and deadly gas such as Phosgene. Phosgene was more potent than chlorine because that whilst chlorine caused the victim to violently cough

  1. The impact of bombing during WWII

    Source D3 is two unconnected accounts which both express the writers experience with groups of people during bombing as "hysteria" The fact there are two different accounts expressing the same evidence, support the claims against the supposed unity. The same feeling was presented to two different parties of people at separate occasions; this signifies they weren't just freak incidents.

  2. The development of a Stalemate

    The German Commander decided to make a modification to the Schlieffen plan and to head straight to Paris instead of swinging around it. This gave the French a chance to intercept the Germans by rail. The German army was weary and overstretched, but they were fighting to save their country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work