We began this class with reading Mary Louise Pratts essay Arts of the Contacts Zones.By reading this essay, I was able to understand the meaning of being able to read a text through the lens of a theory and I was able to use this con

Authors Avatar

Arts of the Contacts Zones

        We began this class with reading Mary Louise Pratt’s essay “Arts of the Contacts Zones”. We soon learned that this essay was going to be the building block of all our work for the rest of the year. By reading this essay, I was able to understand the meaning of being able to read a text through the lens of a theory and I was able to use this concept of writing in each of the papers that I wrote throughout the year.

        The first essay that I wrote was “On the Other Side dated February 12, 2010. I was able to use Pratt’s theories of writing and her ideas of “contact zones” as a way to develop my essay about being a female hockey player who was no longer considered to be in the dominant culture. I incorporated my own experiences with “contact zones” and explained the affect it had on my life. Seeing as though this was my first essay of the class, there are many areas in this essay where I could of expanded my ideas and taken my thoughts further. A specific area where I could of done this was when I stated how “I slowly began to disassociate myself from hockey because I couldn’t deal with the judgments and stereotypes I kept being labeled” (Gray 4). After this statement I moved onto new ideas and thoughts. If I wanted to make this essay stronger, I believe I should of looked deeper into why I wanted to dissociated myself from this culture and how I was able to do so. This would have given my argument not only more support, but it would have expanded it as well. In addition to reading this essay, I found it quite odd at the fact that I never mentioned marginalization, which is another term that Pratt had incorporated in her essay. I was talking about being in the marginalized culture throughout my paper and the affect it had when you’re not in the dominant culture. I believe if I had brought up marginalization, it would have given my paper more power and foundation of Pratt’s theories. Even though I used a lot of Pratt’s concepts, I had no direct quotes from Pratt’s essay, which can be really important in a paper to not only add evidence, but give support as well. While there are obviously areas I could have improved in, I believe I did an overall good job of reading against the grain instead of summarizing my experience. I was able to go in depth of why I felt the way I did due to the fact I was not in the dominant culture and gave examples of experiences I went through where I felt this way.

Join now!

        The second essay I wrote was “Othello Syndrome” dated March 22, 2010. In this essay I explored the parallels between racism and jealousy and how it ultimately can lead to violence. I was able to use the lens of Anne DuCille and write about the character Othello and how his actions were parallel to those of O.J. Simpson. I was able to incorporate a lot of DuCille’s concepts like “browning” and the “Mandingo Syndrome” into my paper to support my claims as well as incorporating quotes from Othello. I noticed that I used a lot more evidence from the reading ...

This is a preview of the whole essay