• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Were the British Generals like Sir Douglas Haig responsible for the high casualty figures?

Extracts from this document...


Were the British Generals like Sir Douglas Haig responsible for the high casualty figures? '1916 was a year of killing' - Malcolm Brown, The First World War, 1991. World war one began on August 4th 1914. 'The Great War' lased an unbelievable four years, so it did not end until the winter of 1918. No one expected it to last so long people believed that it would all be over by Christmas. Another thing people did not expect was the fantastically high casualty figures. By December 1914, 90,000 British men had been killed. That resulted in the British army being left with only 10,000 men to win the war. An average of 5509 men from all the forces were being killed each day during world war one. That is over 10 times more men being killed than in the American civil war each day. By the end of the war the British army had lost over 3/4 million men. The exact figure is 761,213 men. Although this is an extremely high figure other countries lost substantially more. The german army had lost almost 2 milliom men by the time the war finally came to a close. After the first day of the Somme over 57,000 British soldiers had lost their lives or been seriously wounded. That is 75% of the British army. Were the British Generals like Sir Douglas Haig responsible for the high casualty figures or were other factors to blame? Was it the lack of training? Was it due to the fact that it was almost impossible to cross no mans land or was t the affect of modern technology? The plan was to attack a 30km strech of German trenches. In the 10 days before the attack the British had rained an unbelievable 1,732,873 shells on the enemy lines. A bombardment so fierce it could be heard in parts of England. ...read more.


Another mistakes common in both battles, was the location. In the Somme they were attacking a piece f land that was too big. They attacked a 30km stretch of German trenches when other battles were only over 10 or 15 km of trenches. In Passendeale, it was a salient. Germans surrounded 3 slides of the place they were attacking. Although Haig was at fault and partly responsible for what happened. There is evidence, which contradicts this. A quote in Haig defence, he had doubts about the readiness of his troops. The French chose the battleground and as French army became weaker. It relied heavily upon the British troops. Joffre pushed Haig to bring forward the attack on the Somme. Haig in fairness, created a first class army from raw recruits. 58 generals were actually killed on the Somme, so not all of the generals were miles and miles behind the front lines in their big chateaus drinking wine. They took part in the battle. Also, one of the major problems for Haig was that the Germans were able to bring in reserve troops, there by lessening the effects of an allied attack. I am now going to look at Trench warfare. Three factors that made it difficult to attack the trenches are, the barbed wire, this prevented you even getting to the enemy trenches, as it was impossible to pass. The zig zag trench system meant that it was difficult to capture and attack the whole trench because if a shell were to land in the trench few people would feel the impact f the shell, the zig zag trenches prevented the enemy firing along the whole trench if they captured a small part. The dugout made it difficult to attack the trenches as, if there was a bombardment before the attack, the dug out would protect the enemy so they would be waiting for the attack. ...read more.


There were three types of gas used. Chlorine and Phosgene, which worked by suffocating the lungs. They killed by asphyxiation. Also there was mustard gas. This was far the worst. The affects of mustard gas did not show until hours after the attack and by this time the gas had already began to rot the body. The victim's skin would blister and the eyes would bulge out. The linings of the lungs would be stripped raw. The pain was unbearable which resulted in victims being needed to be strapped to their beds. Fortunately both sides soon stopped using gas because it was easy to counter attack with gas masks and also you had to rely on the wind to be blowing in the right direction otherwise the gas may be blown back over your own trenches. By 1917 every soldier had an affective gas mask. 3% of war casualties were due to gas. Also in the war grenades were used. Soldiers preferred grenades to bayonets. The British used the pineapple shape Mills bomb, while the Germans used stick shaped grenade known as 'potato mashers'. So in conclusion one can see that not only the generals who were in charge were responsible for the high casualty figures. The high figures were due to many different aspects. Men died due to the lack of concern of modern technology. German machine guns killed british soldiers by the hundreds. So I think that the generals were partly responsible for the high casualty figures as they were the people who gave the orders, which resulted in nearly 60,000 people being wounded or killed in just one day. Although I also think things such as poison gas, machine guns, artillery and the lack of training contributed to the amount of casualties. Machine guns wiped out thousands of people and three per cent of casualties were due to poison gas. So not only the generals like sir Douglas Haig were responsible for the high casualty figures during World War One. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. I need to produce a marketing strategy for a new or existing product. I ...

    Their staff need to be able to deal with an increasingly broader range of questions from their customers and must also be adaptable to move with the marketplace as it develops. Related to market share. Their Energy Supply business has grown in the six months ended 30 June 2000, with

  2. The Battle of the Somme 1916 - source related study.

    Unlike Source D, which targeted the youth, this source is targeted at the whole nation and those in its empire, aimed at gaining huge public support. In contrast, Source E, part of a letter from an Australian Lieutenant who was killed soon after writing this 'last letter' contradicts all that is shown in sources D and F.

  1. The year 1916 was the year of the Battle of the Somme.

    deep and wide and we know that the Germans were the first soldiers to get to the battlefield and create larger trenches. Source A is associated with Source B because it quotes in the extract, "relaxation was difficult". This is linked with the picture because the picture is showing one

  2. The Battle of the Somme 1916

    It is dodgy to judge the dangers of trench warfare on source C because it only tells us the deaths of British soldiers rather than Allied deaths and since all kinds of nationalities of soldiers were fighting for the Allies, it can't represent the overall danger of trench warfare.

  1. In 1915 a British newspaper printed a letter from a

    Chum o' mine and you're dead, matey, And this is the way we part, The bullet went through your head, matey, But Gawd! it went through my 'eart. -Patrick MacGill. Soldiers waiting to go 'over the top' were terrified, reluctant and longing of home.

  2. Did the Soldiers Themselves, Give a more Accurate Picture of Trench Life than Official ...

    source as truthful as possible so we can be sure that it is very accurate. I think this source is reliable because it is primary evidence and the artist would have been there so he would have had a first hand experience of the war.

  1. Compare the ways in which figures of authority are portrayed in Joseph Heller's Catch ...

    Another example of these communicative difficulties is the case of Major Major who receives documents to sign, which have his signature already. The squabbling within the upper ranks is evident in both texts and serves to show us the pettiness and idiocy of figures of authority.

  2. Is source a more reliable than source b for a study of the Effect ...

    Although Sassoon wrote poetry before the War he was no more than a minor Georgian poet. His best poem prior to the War was The Daffodil Murderer - a parody of John Masefield's The Everlasting Mercy. Sassoon wrote The Daffodil Murderer one day in December 1913.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work