What do you find noteworthy about the narrative voice in Spies?

Authors Avatar

Harry Elletson L6 HJC

What do you find noteworthy about the narrative voice in Spies?

The narrative voice in Spies has many different, stylistic and significant features about it, and changes a lot in the novel. The voice usually uses a lot of descriptive and suspenseful language, which often shapes the events to come. It’s form, as I will discuss in the essay, changes from first person to third person quite regularly and finally, the structure of the novel is born out from the use of the narrative voice. There are four main features in which I take great interest that will be the focus point of my essay. These are the use of dual narrative, the use of the unreliable narrator and the continual use of irony.

 

The dual narrative is a device used in which it includes both first person and third person, which of course is the form in which the novel takes. The novel begins with the use of first person, ‘I have a feeling that something, somewhere, has been left unresolved’, which clearly here is very basic and very common. The language he uses here is very mysterious and gripping, which continues in this chapter with, ‘If I only I knew’ and ‘perhaps I’m the only who remembers’. In the second chapter, we are introduced to the third person narrative, with the narrator now referring to himself as ‘Stephen Wheatley’, which in my opinion, is a very unique way of constructing his novel. We see further examples, such as ‘there’s something not quite right about him’ and ‘tell him to wake up and stop being so…unsatisfactory’. Here, the narrator is deliberately distancing himself from the younger Stephen perhaps implying that he is no longer that ‘unsatisfactory’ child and that he is not even Stephen Wheatley any more. The use of the dual narrative here is already shaping the structure of the novel as he is implying to the reader that he isn’t Stephen Wheatley, and that what he sees is a completely different person, which of course, he is. He is Stefan Weitzler, the German self of Stephen Wheatley. The dual narrative also has another use, which is also very important in determining the course of the novel. At the end of Chapter 4 it ends with first person, ‘I shiver’ then in the first paragraph of Chapter 5 is says, ‘And Stephen Wheatley has become this old man who seems to be me’. This, in my opinion, is a deliberate method to distant the child and adult Stephen, so the reader can determine both opinions and both accounts of events. This leads me on to the next noteworthy feature.

Join now!

The use of the unreliable narrative is in many ways a benefit and in others, I believe to be deliberately frustrating. The narrator introduces this feature very early on in the novel when he mentions, ‘Or half-remembers’ and ‘it’s often hard to remember the exact words’. Here, the narrator is warning the reader of the difficulty of locating memories but also he is structuring the way in which he tells the story. The unreliability appears in Chapter 2, when he mentions, ‘or have I got this back to front?’ The language here is very conversational and opens the conversation ...

This is a preview of the whole essay