• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What, in your opinion, were Hamlet's reasons for delaying the killing of the King in Shakespeare's 'Hamlet'?

Extracts from this document...


Q. What, in your opinion, were Hamlet's reasons for delaying the killing of the King in Shakespeare's 'Hamlet'? A. Revenge tragedies have captivated audiences worldwide long before the time of Shakespeare. In reality Hamlet - supposedly a Shakespeare original - has its roots in the celebrated Danish story of Amleth from the twelfth Century. Critics have also drawn many conclusions that 'Hamlet' was a re-make or Shakespeare's version of Thomas Kyd's famous 'The Spanish Tragedy'. Like 'The Spanish Tragedy' and the many other revenge tragedies of that time, Hamlet too consisted of the stock conventions of revenge tragedies like the ghost, the crime done in secret, the play-within-the-play, a male lead who stimulates madness and a heroine who goes mad and commits suicide. Yet there was and is something very different about the tale of 'Hamlet'. This play has managed to keep audiences and critics alike questioning themselves and the world around them. Hamlet's delay in the killing of the King is another aspect that make 'Hamlet' one of the most intriguing plays that explore human nature. Revenge tragedies, especially the ones about murder were extremely popular with the Elizabethan audience. This was more or less because they were forbidden to commit revenge, let alone murder, in their lives. The church forbade it and it was silently agreed upon that if the revenge seeker pursued his aim then he must die too. This is why all the revenge tragedies of that time concluded with the protagonist dying. To me it seems as if Hamlet has been continually delaying avenging his father's murder. Ideas of mere procrastination surface when Hamlet is compared to the young Prince Fortinbras. ...read more.


Hamlet is torn between his duty as a son and his responsibility towards his moral beliefs. This brings us to look at Hamlet's character as a reason for his delay in the killing of the King. Hamlet's character is what made the whole play very different from the other revenge tragedies of that time. Hamlet's character is one of Shakespeare's most complex characters. Perhaps this is why he is a source of fascination to most of his audience as well as critics. His humanity makes him a very appealing personality. He symbolizes what many of us are constantly doing - asking questions. Unanswered questions are silently asked throughout the play like whether or not Queen Gertrude was a conspirator in King Hamlet's murder, whether the King's spirit is friendly or a demon or whether Ophelia dies accidentally or commits suicide. Hamlet's ironical situation probably made the audience more interested in the outcome. Hamlet would be the very last person imaginable in the play to commit murder. Yet he is the one who is assigned the role of an avenger. This adds to the many reasons why there is substantial delay before the actual deed is committed. His situation - or rather his reaction to the situation - make the play on the whole very intriguing. Shakespeare needed Hamlet's humanity to capture and sustain the audience's interest in the play. If all were as easy as it seemed, and the characters had no development in their roles, the play would have been over in the first Act itself. But this would not have made it one of the most successful revenge plays in the history of English Literature. ...read more.


His wordings lead us to believe that the quintessential philosopher. But many have asked the reason to why Hamlet, being the sensitive person he was, kills Rosencrantz and Guildenstern and Polonius. I feel that these murders were done in a fit of rage. We have seen how Hamlet seems to go with the moment for a short while and then come back to reality, without any substantial action taken. I believe the same thing happened here. When hamlet discovered that there was someone behind the curtain he, perhaps impulsively, killed the person, in a fit of rage. As for Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Hamlet probably sent them off too their death to get them out of the way. He believed that they would be a hindrance to his revenge. There are, throughout the play, many reasons as to why Hamlet delayed the killing of the King until the last scene. Some critics even believe that he only did manage to kill the King at the end because the King poisoned his mother. He took revenge for his mother's, not father's murder. There are many justifications for Hamlet's delay and they can be interpreted into whether he was just procrastinating or whether they were truly understandable basis for delay. In conclusion I feel that Hamlet delays the King's murder because of his own character. If he were more like Laertes or Fortinbras the play could have had a different conclusion. But his character - or rather his mind - stood in the way even when he had many an opportunity to kill Claudius. External events might not fully contribute to Hamlet's delay but can be - and perhaps were - used as a reason or an excuse to further delay avenging his father's murder. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hamlet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hamlet essays

  1. Critical review of 'Hamlet'

    Hamlet feels hurt by her and does not want to lay himself to her and risk further rejection but once she is dead there is no risk of that and he speaks truthfully, suggested by lack of soliloquy but realises it is too late.

  2. Scene by Scene - Hamlet.

    and the King of Norway had an understanding beforehand. As before, Polonius can be a foolish busybody or a sinister old man. (Foolish busybodies do not usually become chief advisors to warrior-kings.) Polonius launches into a verbose speech about finding the cause of madness, prompting the queen to tell him

  1. Comparing the revengers Fortinbras, Laertes and Hamlet.

    Laertes is desperate at this point having learned of his fathers' death and seen Ophelia in a terrible state right before his eyes, and he unlike Hamlet, helped by encouragement from Claudius is ready to take revenge. 'I'm lost in it, my lord.

  2. Is Hamlet mad? How does Shakespeare make his audience think about this question and ...

    This letter to Ophelia could just be another way of distracting everyone away from Hamlet's real reason, so he can carry on plotting his revenge. I think that Shakespeare is using this letter to try and confuse the audience, and make them think more about whether Hamlet really is starting to go mad.

  1. In Act two, everyone notices a change in Hamlet because he has began his ...

    What good would he have done for the country? How could he have gone about ruling when the only task he had ever set out to accomplish was done? Hamlet's purpose was clear and when his ambition and drive led him to the ending he desired, the death of Claudius, his purpose was fulfilled.

  2. William Shakespeares' Hamlet is without question the most famous play in the English language.

    "rank" and "gross", and in the metaphor associating the world with an "unweeded garden" The nature of his grief is soon exposed, as we have learnt that his mother, Gertrude, has married her own brother-in-law, only two months after the death of Hamlet's father, believing that her love for Hamlet

  1. Discussing Hamlet.

    Some critics say that he used religion here to serve as an excuse for avoiding the action of "self-slaughter", however I believe in Hamlet's belief and faith in religion, as he swears upon the language of the church, "Hic et Ubique" when promising his purpose to his father's ghost, which I believe Hamlet would have taken very seriously.

  2. Criticism on Hamlet

    Hamlet from Coleridge before he went to Germany, and when he had neither read nor could read a page of German!" Now Hazlitt was on a visit to me at my cottage at Nether Stowey, Somerset, in the summer of the year 1798, in the September of which year I

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work