• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What might modern audiences find dramatically interesting about the presentation of the Duke in Measure for Measure?

Extracts from this document...


What might modern audiences find dramatically interesting about the presentation of the Duke in Measure for Measure? The Duke in Measure for Measure is one of the main characters. He is also has high status. He rules the city, yet he is one of the most underhand, deceitful characters. Even in our first meeting with the Duke, he is complex and confusing. He praises Escalus, even going so far as to say Escalus knows more about ruling than he (the Duke) does, but then he appoints Angelo as his substitute, and carries on throughout the entire play to contradict himself, to lie and to act hypocritically. Act 1 Scene 1 sees the Duke with Angelo and Escalus. He appoints Angelo as his substitute after praising Escalus extremely highly. "Your own science Exceeds, in that, the lists of all advice My strength can give you" This would interest a modern audience because it would perplex them. They would be sure to ask why the Duke would leave Angelo, whom he seems to regard as second choice, in charge? This seems a very strange thing to do, unless there is an ulterior motive, which the majority of a modern audience would already begin to expect. There is the possibility however, that he may be letting Escalus down gently, this however, is not a common theory as it is too obvious and that is not Shakespeare's style. In Act 1 Scene 3, we see the Duke defend himself from a friar's belief that he is in love. "Throw away that thought, Believe not that the dribbling dart of love Can pierce a complete bosom." We find out this conversation is about the Duke wanting to borrow a friar's habit. The real friar thinks the Duke wants this to woo a lady, but the Duke denies this at length and goes on to explain that he wants to spy on his city and his substitute. ...read more.


Lucio does not agree though, and says that nothing will stop the problems and to think that rigidity alone can rid the city of all its problems is no more than wishful thinking. Lucio then says that the citizens of Vienna think Angelo too cruel to be human, and that he agrees with them. Lucio then goes on to describe some ways in which Angelo is said to have been created. Lucio says he isn't sure which theory is correct, but that he thinks Angelo is unbelievably cold, "But it is certain that when he makes water, his urine is congealed ice" The Duke then comments that Lucio is pleasant, in sarcasm, I think. After this comment Lucio says that the Duke would not have punished Claudio so heartlessly for the Duke was guilty of those same crimes. Lucio goes on to say that the Duke was not even fussy about women, would even sleep with a beggar and enjoyed his alcohol. Lucio continues to talk of the Duke in derogatory terms and calls him "A very superficial, ignorant, unweighing fellow" The Duke then seems to lose his temper, and his stance of seeming like a real friar and retorts: "Either this is envy in you, folly, or mistaking" and starts to rant about the Duke's good reputation. The Duke tells Lucio that what Lucio is saying is rubbish and Lucio does not know what he is talking about. Lucio replies: "Sir, I know him, and I love him" But the Duke dismisses this: "Love talks with better knowledge, and knowledge with dearer love" Lucio says "Come, sir, I know what I know" This comment is sure to make audiences react in a certain way. Lucio is so sure of himself, maybe there is some truth in it? This is one of few portrayals of the Duke that is not said by the Duke. ...read more.


The Duke finally starts to give it away in his speech, in which he says: "The Duke Dare no more stretch this finger of mine than he Dare rack his own" And later when he says "I protest I love the Duke as I love myself" The Duke is discovered and finally starts to resolve all the problems he has helped to create. He tells Angelo "Hold no longer out" This is another hypocritical comment, because all he has done throughout the play is hold out and hold back information. Perhaps the most bewildering thing to a modern audience is that he persists to tell Isabella that Claudio is dead. There can be no reason for this anymore, and he can only be dramatising the end solution. And as he mocks Isabella with grief, he also does it to Mariana by marrying her to Angelo and then telling her Angelo must be beheaded, to which she replies: "Oh, my gracious lord, I hope you will not mock me with a husband" Eventually the Duke is persuaded and also reveals Claudio to Isabella, but as he does he also proposes to Isabella! Modern Audiences are unbelievably shocked by this and find it implausible that Isabella would agree, but it is implied that she does. The Duke marries Claudio and Juliet but punishes Lucio in a way that most audiences agree to be the most evil of all the punishments. He torments him with tales of torture, marriage to a prostitute and death and only repents when Lucio begs "Do not marry me to a whore" It is as though when the Duke realises this is the last thing Lucio wants this is what he does, letting him off without his other punishments. The Duke is shown to be egotistical, dishonest, a liar, a hypocrite and also rather evil. He feels no compassion or forgiving for others, and considers himself inferior to no-one. He has an inflated sense of his own importance and is not a nice character at all. Emma Bone English Literature CG 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Measure for Measure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Measure for Measure essays

  1. In measure for measure,the characters of Angelo and Isabella are similar.discuss

    what he is feeling towards Isabella because he was never able to speak out openly about sex, emotions, love etc. "What's this?" "What's this?" (2:2, L 164) .For both of these characters repressing their sexuality discourages the audience from identifying with them.

  2. Discuss the theme of deception and disguise in the play "Measure for Measure."

    Instead of receiving discipline from the nurse the infant himself dispenses the punishment and seems that the Duke believes that this role reversal is unacceptable. Friar Thomas's intervention in line 32 is very significant because the Friar wants to know why the Duke didn't "unloose this tied up justice" himself, instead of expecting Angelo to do it.

  1. Comment on Shakespeare's conclusion to 'Measure for Measure'

    Another character who is in disguise is Claudio, when he enters muffled at the end of Act Five, as he is still under imprisonment. This final revealing is significant, because this is when the Duke had made Isabella believe that her brother was dead.

  2. Paying close attention to the language, tone and action of the passage, show how ...

    moral position before she actually gets to mention the specifics, perhaps this shows that she does have faith in her brother's ideals. She starts off by over-emphasising how evil Angelo is, "There is a devilish mercy in the judge", maybe she hopes that Claudio would prefer is she didn't lose her chastity to a man so wicked in nature.

  1. Consider Act II of "Measure for Measure", with regard to ideas of Justice and ...

    There is an element of irony here since the dowry which stopped Claudio and Juliet from marrying is also the same thing that brings about Angelo's downfall in regard to Marianna. We are also reminded of Juliet being a mother and Claudio being a father, Angelo is not only killing

  2. What do you find dramatically interesting about Shakespeare's presentation of the Duke in the ...

    The fact that these men are comparing amount of diseases they have gained gives impression of the City of Vienna as being in total moral decay. Later it is believed that "the strict deputy" has ordered for the arrest of young Claudio for it IS "for getting madam Juliet with child".

  1. Shakespeare Uses Imagery to create both Characters and Their Environment. Show how he does ...

    he is merely superficial...(1) Unlike most other characters in Measure for Measure, Lucio is amoral rather than immoral, so that our view of him constantly changes, because we have no moral grounds to judge him on. When we first meet him, his jokes with the two gentlemen associate venereal disease

  2. In Measure for Measure, Shakespeare forces questions to be asked about a wide range ...

    One can immediately observe Shakespeare's use of irony in language when we look at the names of the two characters. 'Lucio' recalls Lucifer, the archangel who rebelled against God, whilst 'Angelo' would appear more obviously saintly. This fits precisely with their apparent characterisation: Lucio would outwardly appear to be a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work