Which Character in Hardy's "Tess Of The D'Urbervilles" Do You Have the Most Sympathy For: Alec or Angel?

Authors Avatar

Tracey O’Hara

WHICH CHARACTER DO YOU HAVE THE MOST SYMPATHY FOR:

ALEC OR ANGEL?

Alec and Angel are the principle male characters in Tess Of The D’Urbervillles, who have a direct impact on the destiny and ultimate tragedy of the heroine Tess. Hardy skilfully creates two complex and contrasting characters whose relationships with Tess evolve and mature in distinctive ways. I will analyse how their personality traits and temperaments affect their relationships with, and treatment of Tess.

Hardy’s introduction of Alec and Angel gives us an indication of their physical appearance, complex characteristics, and future destiny. Angel’s first appearance is at ‘The May-Day dance’, where Tess is one of the maids. He appears to be a ‘desultory tentative student’ who is still finding his way in life and ‘the entrance to his professional grove’. This indicates his youthfulness and openness of mind and spirit. In contrast to his brothers Angel stays to ‘have a fling’ with the girls in the field, showing his individuality and resistance to conform. When leaving the field he noticed Tess and was sorry that ‘he had not observed’ her sooner as he would have wished to ‘inquire her name’. Angel unknowingly rejected Tess for the first time.

Our first introduction to Alec, a false D’Urberville, is at his home ‘The slopes’ with its artificial name and settings. His appearance is stereotypical of a Victorian stage villain with a ‘swarthy complexion’, curling black moustache, and ‘bold rolling eye’. Tess has been sent by her mother to claim kin and Alec does not ‘regret her step’. Immediately his lustful attraction is apparent as his eyes rivet on her ‘fullness of growth’ and his dominance and forcefulness are evident when he continues to feed the strawberry directly into Tess’s mouth, even though she shows ‘slight distress’. Alec’s obsessive nature emerges as he plans how he can ‘find a berth for’ Tess and bring her back to the Slopes permanently.

Join now!

Angel was a romantic idealist who only through time, experience and suffering was able to understand the true meaning of life long love, albeit too late. He was a well educated, ‘musical’ and poetic, free thinking young man, who broke away from his family traditions in the ministry. His decision to become a farmer led to his meeting with Tess and her ‘touches of rarity’ compelled him to select her company ‘in preference to the other pretty maids’, and the romance began and their love blossomed and grew. His love was passionate, he was ‘driven towards her by every ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

A persuasively argued essay which makes effective use of frequent brief quotation from the text. It could be further improved by more reference to actual incidents in the novel, and by an exploration of how Tess's responses together with Hardy's authorial comments might contribute to shaping the reader's response to the two male characters.

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

The spelling and grammar is overall fine, with only a few mistakes (“down fall” and the phrase “This shattered his illusion of Tess ‘you were one person’, ‘now you are another’ led to Angels ultimate rejection of her.”). The writer uses a variety of language to explain quotations, though without using particularly technical language. It is important to show you are aware of literary terms and techniques as this is a clear distinguishing factor between a low- and high-level answer – it adds weight to an argument and gives the essay overall a tone of knowledge.

The writer shows a good knowledge of the text through the use of frequent embedded quotations and goes some way to analysing these quotes by explaining their meaning and offering one interpretation. Embedded quotations are good to use as they give an essay more fluency than a point-quote-analysis approach, which can often seem disjointed. However, they rarely extend this analysis to an evaluation and often do not consider other interpretations. For example, the line “became ‘the blood-red ray in the spectrum of her young life'” could have been significantly expanded in terms of language analysis – what does the choice of colour imagery say about the narrator's sympathy for Alec and how does it influence your own ideas about him?Alternative interpretations are key to writing a high quality answer – they show the examiner that you have considered a range of what something could mean as well as what you think it means. Evaluation is therefore easier to insert as the writer can explain why these interpretations are likely or unlikely. For the above quote the writer could have evaluated the effectiveness of the use of vivid colour imagery in altering the reader's perspective on Alec – and this can be an entirely personal response (just keep it in the 3rd person). Paragraphs 5 and 6 do provide a clear balancing of ideas, which is important since it does show a consideration of alternative perspectives, and the writer occasionally offers some evaluation of whether speech can be taken at face value and in the conclusion judging Alec to be “the more obvious villain”. The overall conclusion makes a decision as to the extent of sympathy, effectively answering the question. However, throughout the essay the writer does not continuously give his own judgement about how each piece of evidence contributes towards his/her own feelings of sympathy – they write, “justifiable down fall” as though they have already made up their mind without explicitly saying why. Perhaps at the end of each paragraph or set of points they could relate this back to how the points affect their sympathy for the characters, which clearly signposts to a reader that the writer has included evaluation and gone further than a mechanical response, considering the text personally. Also, sometimes it feels as though the writer is just giving us an account of events in the novel. This will score few or no marks in an exam or coursework as it doesn't display any level of understanding of the text, just that the writer knows what happens (and this could have been through a synopsis). Whilst very occasionally it can clarify where in the text we are, try to avoid simply retelling events as it takes up time and effort and will not earn you marks, and use the time to extend analysis and evaluation as explained above.

A good focus overall on Alec and Angel, with each paragraph clearly considering different aspect of the characters' personalities. The writer never strays from the question at hand, which shows a clear level of understanding as to what the question was asking. The writer could have included a paragraph or two considering Alec and Angel together – this would show the reader that they are able to make connections between characters and evaluate them against one another, a high-level skill. Topic sentences are used well and the essay is structurally coherent.