• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who Controls the past, controls the future - Who Controls the present controls the past - What might George Orwell have meant to say when he said this?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question: Who Controls the past, controls the future. Who Controls the present controls the past. What might George Orwell have meant to say when he said this? George Orwell, a large figure of literature, was an anti-communism, and against totalitarian tendencies. Therefore, in 1949, he published a book, 1984, warning about the future. A prediction of the future? Fear is a characteristic built within the human being, which at the time was the future and in whose hands it would be? In this novel, George Orwell's vision of the world is deeply shocking, as domination of a certain 'Party', controls everyone and everything. They control what we (the public) see, hear, touch, smell, and even think about. History is a vital part of human existence and as illustrated well in the book, the past is 'nature alterable', and if done so, will be true 'from everlasting to everlasting'. ...read more.

Middle

manpower, they may as shown in the book, undergo military action, and overthrow the world, in order to obtain a single ruling dictator, which will continue to rule, therefore controlling the future. The party did control the present at the time therefore they had the capabilities of oppressing it as they wished. Every piece of literature, rewritten every photo reproduced, in order to fit their fictional stories of economical success, and military victory. By creating a positive and successful image of the party, they gained the back of the people as the only version of the passed accessible to them is the parties biased fictional, false past. Moreover another idea brought into the novel was 'doublethink' this was that 3 + 3 = 7. ...read more.

Conclusion

Similarly, this is the case at present, in the 21st century, whereby one dominating nation, controls, the media, including subliminal messages, two-way television, newspapers, computer viruses (which cause a threat to all information systems). These could have a global impact, and cause us (the public) to abide by that nations rules, regulations, and follow all views of that nation. This manipulation of the human mind, is a very dangerous concept, as world domination, could result easily, through the influence of the people's political and ethical views, in order to win them over to their side, or in other words brainwashing. Therefore, Orwell was warning from the effects that could result from the totalitarian policies arousing at the time post World War II, which are still in the process of completion. However, Orwell, did add a great deal of exaggeration within the book, as in reality, the effects and beliefs will not be as embellished as stated within the novel. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level George Orwell section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

This answer is a strikingly profound response to the novel. The candidate shows a clear and deep understanding of the intentions of the Party's mantra "Who controls the past, controls the future: who controls the present, who control the past". ...

Read full review

Response to the question

This answer is a strikingly profound response to the novel. The candidate shows a clear and deep understanding of the intentions of the Party's mantra "Who controls the past, controls the future: who controls the present, who control the past". There is plentiful evidence of the candidate taking time to elaborate on the mantra to ensure full understanding for the reader of their essay, and they then go on to answer the question more explicitly, showing how Orwell intends to solidify the totalitarian dystopia of The Party's oppressive rule as a means of controlling of the history, and what it means for the present and future.

Level of analysis

The Level of Analysis here is excellent,. The candidate shows deep-set knowledge and critical understanding of Orwell's fictional mantra, appreciating the harrowing realism of the novel that are alive even today towards the end. This particular section I would dispute is not absolutely necessary, so other candidate should not feel discouraged if they cannot include this, but it will help the candidate's answer stick out among hundreds of other similar essays. Where this answer excels it's it's sensitive critical understanding of the rule The Party instates on it's civilians.

Where it is not so impressive is the glaring error which sees the candidate write "Who controls the past, controls the future: who controls the future, who control the past", although this is not hugely detrimental to the essay. There is also a minor irk in that they write: "Moreover another idea brought into the novel was 'doublethink' this was that 3 + 3 = 7." If stating an example, they should explicitly say so, and I would advise therefore to use the example in the novel ("2 + 2 = 5"). The wording in the statement the candidate gives suggests that all doublethink is believing 3 + 3 = 7; this is not a definition of doublethink - it is merely one very simple example given by O'Brien. Candidates should watch how they exemplify something so complex.

Quality of writing

Quality of Written Communication as a whole is pretty good, however the punctuation in particular can really make this essay a struggle to read. The answer is riddled with comma splice (unnecessary use of commas) - too many to list here. The candidate sometimes substitutes full stops for commas lending to grammatical nightmares, or simply puts commas where they aren't needed, which breaks up the flow of the otherwise very well-written sentences to a snail's pace, really detracting from the impact of such a good essay. The disjointed nature also loses the fluidity of the writing, making the answer seem less knowledgeable than it actually is because of the drip-fed chunks of half-sentences. This is something that really needs to be addressed as it hugely prevents this essay from achieving the A grade it's capable of.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by sydneyhopcroft 04/07/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level George Orwell essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Critical Appriciation of the Two Minuets Hate in 1984

    5 star(s)

    The fickleness of the Party members distresses Winston 'the sandy haired woman shouting what sounded like "my Saviour"' as he seems to realise the stupidity of the 'frenzy'. Orwell contradicts the whole of the Party's endeavour to create a 'perfect' world and stamp out all feelings, as 'his heart went out to the lonely, derided, heretic on the screen'.

  2. Peer reviewed

    "Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It ...

    5 star(s)

    The clear similarity between Winston's bleak world and pat totalitarian dictatorships is the severity of the regime, not surprise in a state which removes one's individually as with the description of the man sent to Room 1o1 as simply a 'skull faced man'.

  1. Peer reviewed

    1984 fifty years on - in what respects has the fictitious future vision of ...

    4 star(s)

    The most obvious feature in the novel that existed -and still exists for example in Cuba - is the totalitarian government.

  2. George Orwell, one of English literatures most important and famous writers, draws the picture ...

    English language such as "excellent" or "splendid" and replaces them with an extremely plain word such as "plusgood". Changing the language and limiting it in number of words becomes a matter of importance since language is one of the most important tools of expression and thought for human beings.

  1. 1984 Orwell

    However, O'Brien turns out to be a party man who has Winston captured. Winston is the last man in BB's dictatorship who tries to keep control of his inner self, but he is arrested because his love story to Julia is illegal and mentally and physically tortured until he loses his mental integrity.

  2. GEORGE ORWELL A comparative study of Burmese Days, Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty- ...

    This resulted in The Road To Wigan Pier. He went on living among the poor about who he has to write the book. Once again it was a journey away from the comparative comfort of the middle class life. For while the first part of the book is the kind

  1. Why George Orwell's Down and Out in Paris and London is an effective piece ...

    the effort to express, and so their expression becomes a daily necessity, taken for granted. Just because life is so confined, the details dull and unvaried, after the necessities of food, drink and sleep, little is worth noticing. And as the noise and filth increase the area of interest shrinks.

  2. How does Orwell tell the story in Chapter 10 of Animal Farm?

    made them work harder than anywhere else in England and for less food. The animals had to work harder to compensate for the fact that ?neither pigs nor dogs produced any food by their own labour?, were unable to officially retire from work and were controlled/suppressed ? for example no

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work