• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front? In mid-September 1914 German troops dug into the high ground over looking the river Aisne, in northern France. After heavy losses in vain attempts to take the German line, the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) was forced into a deadlock; they could not get to the enemy. This was the beginning of the Western Front. What followed was 'The race to the sea' as the BEF, the French, and the German Armies tried to outflank each other, northward, until they reached the English Channel. All three armies left complex trench systems behind them and as they became grounded, a 'war of movement' became a 'war of position'. Trenches stretched from Switzerland all the way to the Channel. Sir John French, Commander of the BEF, stated in a letter to King George V, "the spade will be as great a necessity as the rifle". ...read more.

Middle

Early in the war the machine gun became widely available and soon both sides had a vast number of these deadly weapons which were used to great effect. Long lines of advancing infantry could be mowed down at an alarming rate. Both sides used this new weapon to successfully defend themselves, but in doing so they simply perpetuated the deadlock. As with machine guns, the Allies and the Germans matched each other in terms of troop numbers, rifles and military technology. This was an important factor in the development of the stalemate. Artillery became the backbone of any infantry assault on the enemy lines. Short-barrelled howitzer guns could now accurately pound enemy trenches, or stop infantry charges. The weaponry turned no-man's land into a crater-filled bog which hampered movement and communication. At Neuve Chapelle in 1916, for example, the artillery showed its devastating power when 340 British guns obliterated the German line in a few hours. ...read more.

Conclusion

They were fortified with sandbags and protected by barbed wire which trapped oncoming infantry, and exposed them to gunfire. Even the term 'digging in' carries a connotation of permanence. Soldiers were expecting to fight for a long period of time, and therefore this contributed to the stalemate. Not only physical factors were important in the development of a deadlock, there was a psychological side to the conflict as well. A large number of unwritten arrangements came into being. Many men saw that they were in permanent positions that would rarely move. They therefore concentrated on making life for themselves as bearable as possible rather than committing themselves to almost certain death. An example of this can be seen in the reluctance of all armies to fire shells at mealtimes. This etiquette was also demonstrated in the Christmas truces in 1914 up and down the Western Front. All these factors combined to create a stalemate on the Western Front which was only to be lifted in 1917-18. Luke la Hausse, 4 Alpha ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. "Poems and stories; official accounts. Which of these give a more accurate picture of ...

    Owen describes "Gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs", this is true, one of the effects of being caught in a gas attack was that your lungs would produce a froth, in a desperate attempt to protect themselves; this froth would in turn suffocate the person.

  2. Why Did the Stalemate on the Western Front Occur?

    the 'Hindenburg Line', a fortified line of trenches, and comfortable compared to the British and French trenches. This line was more or less straight, making it impossible to do anything except charge it at the front. This made it even harder to attack, and added the possibility of losing even more men, but still the Allies kept attacking.

  1. New technologies and their effect on the stalemate on the Western Front.

    He fitted this synchronizing gear to his new range of Fokker E aircraft. These planes arrived on the Western Front during the summer of 1915. This new technological advance gave the German pilots a considerable advantage over the Allied pilots.

  2. Why Did A Stalemate Develop On The Western Front ?

    The French pushed Germany back sixty kilometres, both sides tried to outflank each other but they ended up by the sea.

  1. The development of a Stalemate

    Russia planned to do the same in reverse. Each of these plans had been worked out to the last detail, which was their problem. The key to their success was speed. Every army was to be taken to battle in thousands of railway trains and would overwhelm the enemy by sheer force.

  2. The Western Front.

    Inside The Trenches: The construction of the trenches varied. The front line trenches were usually about seven feet deep and six feet wide. The front of the trench was known as the parapet and the rear of the trench was known as the parados. The top two or three feet of the trench would consist of a thick line of sandbags to absorb bullets or shell fragments.

  1. The stalemate developed on the Western front - why and for how long?

    Instead of sweeping West of Paris to take control of the ports, they went East to try to make up time and because they lacked soldiers. France had now received word of the Germans advancing into Paris, so the French armies that had failed to take Alsace Lorraine joined the retreating French armies in the North.

  2. How and why did the fighting on the Western front develop into stalemate and ...

    The front-line for each army was a series of communication trenches, support trenches, advanced trenches and observation posts. Between the two forward trenches lay the deserted No-Man's land which could be as wide as half a mile, or at some points only twenty or thirty yards.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work