• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front? In mid-September 1914 German troops dug into the high ground over looking the river Aisne, in northern France. After heavy losses in vain attempts to take the German line, the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) was forced into a deadlock; they could not get to the enemy. This was the beginning of the Western Front. What followed was 'The race to the sea' as the BEF, the French, and the German Armies tried to outflank each other, northward, until they reached the English Channel. All three armies left complex trench systems behind them and as they became grounded, a 'war of movement' became a 'war of position'. Trenches stretched from Switzerland all the way to the Channel. Sir John French, Commander of the BEF, stated in a letter to King George V, "the spade will be as great a necessity as the rifle". ...read more.

Middle

Early in the war the machine gun became widely available and soon both sides had a vast number of these deadly weapons which were used to great effect. Long lines of advancing infantry could be mowed down at an alarming rate. Both sides used this new weapon to successfully defend themselves, but in doing so they simply perpetuated the deadlock. As with machine guns, the Allies and the Germans matched each other in terms of troop numbers, rifles and military technology. This was an important factor in the development of the stalemate. Artillery became the backbone of any infantry assault on the enemy lines. Short-barrelled howitzer guns could now accurately pound enemy trenches, or stop infantry charges. The weaponry turned no-man's land into a crater-filled bog which hampered movement and communication. At Neuve Chapelle in 1916, for example, the artillery showed its devastating power when 340 British guns obliterated the German line in a few hours. ...read more.

Conclusion

They were fortified with sandbags and protected by barbed wire which trapped oncoming infantry, and exposed them to gunfire. Even the term 'digging in' carries a connotation of permanence. Soldiers were expecting to fight for a long period of time, and therefore this contributed to the stalemate. Not only physical factors were important in the development of a deadlock, there was a psychological side to the conflict as well. A large number of unwritten arrangements came into being. Many men saw that they were in permanent positions that would rarely move. They therefore concentrated on making life for themselves as bearable as possible rather than committing themselves to almost certain death. An example of this can be seen in the reluctance of all armies to fire shells at mealtimes. This etiquette was also demonstrated in the Christmas truces in 1914 up and down the Western Front. All these factors combined to create a stalemate on the Western Front which was only to be lifted in 1917-18. Luke la Hausse, 4 Alpha ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. The development of a Stalemate

    It took only three weeks for each of the war plans to fail, which meant that after only three weeks the military leaders had to rethink what to do next. The first of which being The Schlieffen Plan, when the German armies marched into Belgium the Belgium army put up more resistance than Germany had expected.

  2. Why did stalemate develop on the western front?

    A race began to take control of this position. Without weakening their grip on the defensive line of trenches, each army tried to outflank the other to gain the advantage. This so called 'Race for the Sea' ended at the first battle of Ypres. By the end of 1914 the offensive approach had been abandoned in favour of a

  1. Why Did the Stalemate on the Western Front Occur?

    the 'Hindenburg Line', a fortified line of trenches, and comfortable compared to the British and French trenches. This line was more or less straight, making it impossible to do anything except charge it at the front. This made it even harder to attack, and added the possibility of losing even more men, but still the Allies kept attacking.

  2. The stalemate developed on the Western front - why and for how long?

    The Schlieffen Plan had failed. By October the Germans had failed to capture Paris and had been stopped at the battle of Marne. Both sides now rushed troops to the North to capture the channel ports in the 'race for the sea'.

  1. The Western Front.

    It was not uncommon for soldiers to be in the front line trenches for over thirty days at a time. Short trenches called saps were dug across No-Man's land. These were dug towards the enemy trenches, and allowed soldiers to move forwards, without exposure to fire.

  2. Why Did A Stalemate Develop On The Western Front ?

    The French pushed Germany back sixty kilometres, both sides tried to outflank each other but they ended up by the sea.

  1. New technologies and their effect on the stalemate on the Western Front.

    He was another of the many trying to develop a machine-gun that could fire through rotating propeller blades. In autumn of 1915 Fokker was fitting his Eindecker planes with interrupter gear, therefore producing the first true fighter aircraft. Also called a synchronizing gear, the propeller was linked by a shaft

  2. "Poems and stories; official accounts. Which of these give a more accurate picture of ...

    The fact that this detail is correct makes the other information in the poem more believable, she describes that the mud is drowning the soldiers, obviously this is in a metaphorical sense, but I believe she means that it destroys their morale and health.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work