Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front? A stalemate is a situation where neither side can win. During the First World War, a stalemate developed between the Allies and the Germans on the Western Front. One reason why a stalemate developed on the Western Front was because the Schlieffen Plan failed. Before the invasion of Belgium, the British had been uncertain about joining the war, but Germany had invaded a neutral country and in 1839, Britain had guaranteed to defend Belgium because of their treaty in 1839. Germany failed to capture the ports at Dunkirk and Calais, and Britain declared war on the 4th of August 1914 and sent the British Expeditionary Force (BEF)

Middle

The failure of the Schlieffen Plan led to a stalemate on the Western Front because not attacking Paris meant that they had to dig trenches in France, and trench warfare proved to be very difficult. Another reason why stalemate developed on the Western Front was that commanders on all sides failed to realise the importance of the new technology and weapons that had been developed. The machine gun, heavy artillery and barbed wire all made attacking very difficult, especially when there were no ways of transporting infantry quickly. In addition many commanders clung on to the idea of using cavalry as a way of breaking the deadlock for far too long, sending soldiers across No Man's Land to attack the enemy trenches, resulting in the loss of many men.

Conclusion

The tank was believed to be able to crush barbed wire, cross trenches and destroy machine guns. General Haig used 50 'Mark I' tanks at the Somme, but these were proved to be unreliable as they broke down a lot and got stuck in the mud across No Man's Land. Artillery also failed to break the stalemate, as new tactics such as a 'creeping barrage' would fire in front of soldiers as they crossed No Man's Land, which had no effect as they often ended up killing their own men due to the requirement of extreme accuracy. Also, the Germans were prepared for bombardments of artillery shells on their trenches as they built reinforced dug outs underground and so were sheltered and protected from the shelling. Steph Birnage 10L History coursework - The First World War

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. The Battle of the Somme 1916

    Both sources agree with the point of view. It is safe to say that the man who wrote the letter in source E, John Raws would probably have gone along with the statement. He had first hand experience of the Battle of the Somme and his words for the generals were ''incompetence, callousness and personal vanity''.

  2. Why did stalemate develop on the western front?

    Faced with an impenetrable German line the Allies themselves dug in. The Commanders of the opposing sides, Joffre and Falkenhayn, realised that the advantage now lay to the North between their position on the Aisne and the Sea. A race began to take control of this position.

  1. Why Did the Stalemate on the Western Front Occur?

    However, though they were demoralised, the French killed nearly as many Germans as the Germans killed the French. Another important reason for the stalemate (but no the most important) was the type of weapons used in the First World War.

  2. New technologies and their effect on the stalemate on the Western Front.

    the Airco DH2 and the Nieuport 17), that were also armed with synchronized machine-guns. Nevertheless both sides made rapid advances in all areas of aircraft technology, but the balance of power was constantly changing, as each advance of one side was equalled or bettered by the other side.

  1. The development of a Stalemate

    The military leaders' tactics on the western front were out dated and ineffective for the type of warfare they had encountered in the Great War, especially trench warfare. Because of this the war took longer and more people's lives were lost.

  2. The stalemate developed on the Western front - why and for how long?

    Instead of sweeping West of Paris to take control of the ports, they went East to try to make up time and because they lacked soldiers. France had now received word of the Germans advancing into Paris, so the French armies that had failed to take Alsace Lorraine joined the retreating French armies in the North.

  1. The Western Front.

    As the Germans were the first to decide where to dig, they had been able to choose the best places to build their trenches. Their choice of the higher ground not only gave the Germans a tactical advantage, but it also forced the British to live in the worst conditions.

  2. Why Did A Stalemate Develop On The Western Front ?

    General Von Moltke took over Schlieffen's plan he sent the troops the wrong way around Paris so they collided with the retreating French army which meant it was a longer and harder journey for the German army to get to Paris.

  • Over 180,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.