• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Was The Stalemate of World War One Broken in 1918?

Extracts from this document...


Why Was The Stalemate of World War One Broken in 1918? By 1918, World War One had already been fought for 4 years. At first it was a 'war of movement', but by 1915 the increasing usage of machine guns led to trench warfare, with each side digging a system of trenches on each front. This then made it exceedingly difficult for any advances to be made and any new land to be secured by either side, but in 1918 this situation of stale was to be broken. At the beginning of 1918 there seemed little hope of ending the war. Both sides, the Allies and Germany, had suffered tremendous losses, diminishing the morale of all the countries involved. The war of attrition had taken its toll and it was now a question of which side could hold out the longest and continue to batter the enemy. The Allies did have one great advantage over the Germans. ...read more.


The Allied attacks continued and the Germans, worn down by 4 years of war and devastated by the failure of their offensive, were unable to prevent their supply lines to the Western Front from being cut. They had no choice but to seek an armistice, which was eventually signed in November 1918, bringing an end the First World War. It is debatable how much new technology contributed to breaking the stalemate in 1918. Gas was used with the intention of disorientating or knocking out soldiers so that attacking them would be easier. Gases caused problems, as trenches couldn't immediately be taken as the gas had to settle. Sometimes the gases even blew back into the attackers trenches. When used properly gas could be useful during attacks, but it was not a war winning development. Tanks provided soldiers with a way of moving forward to attack the enemy and at the same time covered them from enemy machine gun fire. ...read more.


In October, there was a revolution and the Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, a communist, overthrew Kerensky. Lenin didn't agree with the war and called for a peace settlement with Germany. Germany agreed and Russia had to give them a great deal of land in return. This now left Germany with a million troops on the eastern front that could now be moved to the western front to use in the final German offensive. This obviously affected the timing of the final offensive as the Germans now had more troops and therefore a larger chance of overcoming their enemy. So, the revolution in Russia affected when the stalemate was broken. Overall, a combination of factors led to a breakthrough in the stalemate in 1918, but most important of all was the German's final offensive in 1918, triggered by the entrance of the United States on the side of the Allies. If America had not entered the war, Germany may not have been forced into a final offensive and the stalemate may have continued, prolonging the war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. History - World War One

    Munitions were a key part of the war effort back at home. About 900,000 women were incorporated in making shells, guns and aircraft for the Allied forces. Under the Munitions of War Act of 1915, the government introduced a policy of dilution into munitions factories - meaning women were able

  2. History Coursework - World War One Sources Question

    The level of patriotism (positive spin towards a country, usually increasing in time of war) was increased to compensate for the losses from Kitchners' volunteers, the first mass-volunteers to the British army for over a hundred years. Inadequately trained, indifferently equipped, and ineffectively led, they paid with their lives by

  1. In my work i am going to explain why i believe that new technology ...

    At first the Germans seemed to be unstoppable as they had already advanced 65 kilometres and by July they had reached the river Marne again. What they did not realise was that the plan had already failed. This was because he had sent too many troops forward and now had

  2. Why did the stalemate end in 1918?

    and gas was then countered by the invention of the gas mask. Attack by air became popular, yet as new as the technology was, it was not advanced enough to be successful and was countered by air-raid precautions so the stalemate once again continued.

  1. The following reasons were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the western front ...

    Thanks to its enormous firing power, it was able to stop massive infantry attacks and it obliged infantrymen to seek cover, removing any escape route out of the attack. However, these heavy machine guns were not reliable in all conditions.

  2. “For 3 years from the end of 1914 to early 1918, the Western Front ...

    before, so it was just a matter of time before some kind of breakthrough was made. Whether it came from attrition, new technology, new tactics or political changes, 3 years later in 1918, a breakthrough was made. So we know how this deadlock situation occurred, but how was it broken out of, and why in 1918?

  1. The development of a Stalemate

    It took only three weeks for each of the war plans to fail, which meant that after only three weeks the military leaders had to rethink what to do next. The first of which being The Schlieffen Plan, when the German armies marched into Belgium the Belgium army put up more resistance than Germany had expected.

  2. For over three years, from the end of 1914 to early 1918, the Western ...

    Gas is a prime example of this, and was used for the very first time at Ypres in 1916. It also shows just how new and experimental these technologies were; the Germans did not use more gas or capitalise on the advantage gained from the use of it because they were scared of it, i.e.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work