• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Was The Stalemate of World War One Broken in 1918?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why Was The Stalemate of World War One Broken in 1918? By 1918, World War One had already been fought for 4 years. At first it was a 'war of movement', but by 1915 the increasing usage of machine guns led to trench warfare, with each side digging a system of trenches on each front. This then made it exceedingly difficult for any advances to be made and any new land to be secured by either side, but in 1918 this situation of stale was to be broken. At the beginning of 1918 there seemed little hope of ending the war. Both sides, the Allies and Germany, had suffered tremendous losses, diminishing the morale of all the countries involved. The war of attrition had taken its toll and it was now a question of which side could hold out the longest and continue to batter the enemy. The Allies did have one great advantage over the Germans. ...read more.

Middle

The Allied attacks continued and the Germans, worn down by 4 years of war and devastated by the failure of their offensive, were unable to prevent their supply lines to the Western Front from being cut. They had no choice but to seek an armistice, which was eventually signed in November 1918, bringing an end the First World War. It is debatable how much new technology contributed to breaking the stalemate in 1918. Gas was used with the intention of disorientating or knocking out soldiers so that attacking them would be easier. Gases caused problems, as trenches couldn't immediately be taken as the gas had to settle. Sometimes the gases even blew back into the attackers trenches. When used properly gas could be useful during attacks, but it was not a war winning development. Tanks provided soldiers with a way of moving forward to attack the enemy and at the same time covered them from enemy machine gun fire. ...read more.

Conclusion

In October, there was a revolution and the Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, a communist, overthrew Kerensky. Lenin didn't agree with the war and called for a peace settlement with Germany. Germany agreed and Russia had to give them a great deal of land in return. This now left Germany with a million troops on the eastern front that could now be moved to the western front to use in the final German offensive. This obviously affected the timing of the final offensive as the Germans now had more troops and therefore a larger chance of overcoming their enemy. So, the revolution in Russia affected when the stalemate was broken. Overall, a combination of factors led to a breakthrough in the stalemate in 1918, but most important of all was the German's final offensive in 1918, triggered by the entrance of the United States on the side of the Allies. If America had not entered the war, Germany may not have been forced into a final offensive and the stalemate may have continued, prolonging the war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. History - World War One

    It meant that women could help the country by joining the women's navy and army - it was a way to give women a sense of patriotism and a feel that they were helping the country no matter what background or class they were from.

  2. The development of a Stalemate

    The Belgium army fought bravely for ten days in a battle at liege. Then the British Expeditionary Force showed up which the Germans called a "A Contemptible little army," and slowed down the first German army at Mons. The failure of the Schlieffen Plan was the biggest contribution to stalemate

  1. In my work i am going to explain why i believe that new technology ...

    no reserves to back them up and they were now open to attack from both sides of where they were positioned so really the offensive was just delaying the end of the war. On the 18th of July Foch counter- attacked the Germans with the British led by 456 tanks

  2. The following reasons were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the western front ...

    Their great weight meant they were not mobile enough and they had to be operated by several men at once. 750lb shells could now be fired 8 miles, which could destroy communication lines making it easier to attack, as the opposition couldn't communicate with each other, meaning that enemy couldn't call up for reserves.

  1. Why did the stalemate end in 1918?

    and gas was then countered by the invention of the gas mask. Attack by air became popular, yet as new as the technology was, it was not advanced enough to be successful and was countered by air-raid precautions so the stalemate once again continued.

  2. How and why did the fighting on the Western front develop into stalemate and ...

    The front-line for each army was a series of communication trenches, support trenches, advanced trenches and observation posts. Between the two forward trenches lay the deserted No-Man's land which could be as wide as half a mile, or at some points only twenty or thirty yards.

  1. History Coursework - World War One Sources Question

    it, Passchendaele for example, may well have not been possible, bar such unscrupulous recruitment practices, many of the enlisting Sergeants allowing underage enlistment, "smiling they wrote his lie: aged 19 years", (Disabled) sending five different sets of brothers from Eton alone, to their premature deaths.

  2. “For 3 years from the end of 1914 to early 1918, the Western Front ...

    So at first the impact of what the war would be like didn't really kick in because it began as a war of movement which developed into trench warfare. And it was here where the Generals sat and planned how to break the lines, something that they had never done

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work