• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the Western Front so static for so long?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The western front 1914~1918 continuity and change For over three years, from the end of 1914 to early 1918 the Western Front never moved for more than a mile or so one way or the other. Then in 1918 there was considerable movement as first the Ger,ams amd then the allies advanced. Why was the Western Front so static for so long? There are arguably two main reasons why the Western front was static for so long. The first is the failure of the German and French plans of attack. The second is the inability to adapt to the changing nature of warfare. The French and Germans both had plans that relied on rapid offensive attacks, however when these failed war became static. The German offensive plan known as the Schlieffen plan failed for a number of reasons; it was not followed because the Generals von Kluk and von Moltke went to the east instead of taking Paris, the BEF proved a problem, and the Russians mobilised quicker than expected. This last factor not only helped to ensure the failure of this forward going plan, hence to initially bring about static but it also helped ensure it continued by acting as a diversion from the western front.This diversion helped to ensure the Germans did not have the power to attack and break the stalemate.The French plan, plan 'XVII' also failed as a result of a lack of ability to move forward. ...read more.

Middle

Their use on the Western front was not only a change in itself but it also changed the nature of warfare more fundamentally as it meant that warfare was no longer just about men fighting men, but technology was now a vitally important factor. An important example of this new technology is the powerful machines guns introduced by the Germans which could kill rows of advancing men. This is supported by the words of a German gunner at the Battle of the Somme, 'when we started firing they went down in their hundreds.' In 1918 these machines guns were made portable. Tanks and aeroplanes, even if both only reached the early stages of their developemnt and were largely not used to the full extent of their capabilities, are further examples of such new technology. Planes, for example even though they were largely only used for reconnaisance missions signalled the dawning of a new age of warfare. This was because it took warfare into a whole new dimension, the skies. Poison gas, first used by the Germans in 1915, also signalled a great change in the nature of warfare, as it was the beginning of the use of chemicals in warfare. Another important change in the course of this period was in the sphere of tactics. ...read more.

Conclusion

The allies too adopted new tactics in July 1918 and these also relied on a series of rapid blows. They also introduced a new tactic of properly uniting their forces under one supreme commander, Foch. The morale of both sides changed dramatically in 1918 and morale is a vitally important factor in warfare. The Germans morale was broken by September not only because the British blockade was causing suffering on the 'Home Front' but also because the German spring offensive had failed whilst the allies counter-attack was proving more successful. The morale of the allies was obviously high as a result of this success. The fact that the Americans had entered the war on their side, as well as providing the practical support for the 1918 offensive at the rate of 300,000 men a month, must also have served to boost the morale of the allies in 1918. The final change in 1918 was the successful exploitation of the further improved offensive war technology. This was not only a change in itself but it perhaps also suggests that the millitary mindset had changed and it had finally been realised that it was of little use just using men to face machines, offensive machines needed to be used. The British counter attack in 1918 involved the use of 450 tanks to lead the infantry through the barbed wire, tanks that were now more reliable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. In the wars, Robert Rose is a very significant character.

    Ross. It is her interpretations and ensuing reactions to the tragic events of the novel that reveal the most to the reader about Robert's relationship with her. Mrs. Ross is portrayed as an adamant women in the beginning of Timothy Findley's The Wars, yet as the story progresses, her firmness is broken by various tragedies.

  2. The Battle of the Somme 1916

    British trenches then maybe the artillery would have been more effective and destroyed them. They also should have known that the barbed wire would just hurl up in the air and drop down even more tangled up. More research should have taken place.

  1. How Was The Stalemate Finally Broken?From Christmas 1914 until March 1918 there had been ...

    This resulted in a shortage of ammunition and rations for the soldiers. This also reduced German trade by $5.1 billion. Although this reduced the German trade and made life uncomfortable for the troops and German civilians it didn't really damage Germany and didn't help break the stalemate at all.

  2. The long and the short and the tall

    Very good... Good old Tojo'. This optimistic remark is once again showing how Bamforth treats the prisoner as a loyal pet. This attitude contrasts Bamforth's previous attitude where we saw him not interested at all in the life of others.

  1. Was there much change in warfare on the Western Front between the end of ...

    Although the Mark IV was able to withstand German anti-tank bullets, it didn't change much from the Mark I; its top speed, armour thickness, crew capacity and weapons stayed the same. Introduced in November 1917, was the Mark A tank, the "Whippet".

  2. The development of a Stalemate

    The combined British and French forces were able to stop the German advance along the line of the river Marne. They then counter attacked and pushed the Germans sixty kilometres back to the river Aisne, but they couldn't push them out of France completely this massive loss made the Germans

  1. Propaganda, Recruitment and Resistance: The Home Front 1914-1918

    of a major battle, which resulted in 70% or more of their men killed or seriously wounded. Local areas in England wit a small population lost many of its younger men in a short space of time. The rest of the male population who did not volunteer chose not to for various reasons.

  2. In my work i am going to explain why i believe that new technology ...

    a new hope that these new weapons could be used in breaking the stalemate and every one of these new weapons pushed them closer to the Germans. On the 6th of April 1917 the Americans joined the war, the Europeans thought that they should have joined a long time ago

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work