• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the Western Front so static for so long?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The western front 1914~1918 continuity and change For over three years, from the end of 1914 to early 1918 the Western Front never moved for more than a mile or so one way or the other. Then in 1918 there was considerable movement as first the Ger,ams amd then the allies advanced. Why was the Western Front so static for so long? There are arguably two main reasons why the Western front was static for so long. The first is the failure of the German and French plans of attack. The second is the inability to adapt to the changing nature of warfare. The French and Germans both had plans that relied on rapid offensive attacks, however when these failed war became static. The German offensive plan known as the Schlieffen plan failed for a number of reasons; it was not followed because the Generals von Kluk and von Moltke went to the east instead of taking Paris, the BEF proved a problem, and the Russians mobilised quicker than expected. This last factor not only helped to ensure the failure of this forward going plan, hence to initially bring about static but it also helped ensure it continued by acting as a diversion from the western front.This diversion helped to ensure the Germans did not have the power to attack and break the stalemate.The French plan, plan 'XVII' also failed as a result of a lack of ability to move forward. ...read more.

Middle

Their use on the Western front was not only a change in itself but it also changed the nature of warfare more fundamentally as it meant that warfare was no longer just about men fighting men, but technology was now a vitally important factor. An important example of this new technology is the powerful machines guns introduced by the Germans which could kill rows of advancing men. This is supported by the words of a German gunner at the Battle of the Somme, 'when we started firing they went down in their hundreds.' In 1918 these machines guns were made portable. Tanks and aeroplanes, even if both only reached the early stages of their developemnt and were largely not used to the full extent of their capabilities, are further examples of such new technology. Planes, for example even though they were largely only used for reconnaisance missions signalled the dawning of a new age of warfare. This was because it took warfare into a whole new dimension, the skies. Poison gas, first used by the Germans in 1915, also signalled a great change in the nature of warfare, as it was the beginning of the use of chemicals in warfare. Another important change in the course of this period was in the sphere of tactics. ...read more.

Conclusion

The allies too adopted new tactics in July 1918 and these also relied on a series of rapid blows. They also introduced a new tactic of properly uniting their forces under one supreme commander, Foch. The morale of both sides changed dramatically in 1918 and morale is a vitally important factor in warfare. The Germans morale was broken by September not only because the British blockade was causing suffering on the 'Home Front' but also because the German spring offensive had failed whilst the allies counter-attack was proving more successful. The morale of the allies was obviously high as a result of this success. The fact that the Americans had entered the war on their side, as well as providing the practical support for the 1918 offensive at the rate of 300,000 men a month, must also have served to boost the morale of the allies in 1918. The final change in 1918 was the successful exploitation of the further improved offensive war technology. This was not only a change in itself but it perhaps also suggests that the millitary mindset had changed and it had finally been realised that it was of little use just using men to face machines, offensive machines needed to be used. The British counter attack in 1918 involved the use of 450 tanks to lead the infantry through the barbed wire, tanks that were now more reliable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. In the wars, Robert Rose is a very significant character.

    Mrs Ross' decision to burden Robert with this inhuman act, and his failure to do so lead to the most revealing monologue relevant to their relationship: You think that Rowena belonged to you. Well I'm here to tell you, Robert, no one belongs to anyone.

  2. The Battle of the Somme 1916

    British trenches then maybe the artillery would have been more effective and destroyed them. They also should have known that the barbed wire would just hurl up in the air and drop down even more tangled up. More research should have taken place.

  1. How Was The Stalemate Finally Broken?From Christmas 1914 until March 1918 there had been ...

    This resulted in a shortage of ammunition and rations for the soldiers. This also reduced German trade by $5.1 billion. Although this reduced the German trade and made life uncomfortable for the troops and German civilians it didn't really damage Germany and didn't help break the stalemate at all.

  2. The long and the short and the tall

    Willis Hall uses stage directions here to indicate this. At the end of this conversation, Bamforth says, 'he's almost human this one'. This is an important sign of Bamforth's change in attitude as in the past we have seen him being a bully who has abused everyone. This relationship of communication through sign language has developed an affinity between him and the prisoner.

  1. In my work i am going to explain why i believe that new technology ...

    This then led to a stale mate at sea. I believe that this was an equal part in the stalemate being broken because this caused German the public to turn against the government and so they lost support for the war.

  2. Propaganda, Recruitment and Resistance: The Home Front 1914-1918

    Some men decided not to enlist on occupational grounds. Men who worked in vital industries such as mining felt it was there duty to stay home and continue their essential job. However, this was not the only reason on work-related grounds that people did not volunteer.

  1. “For 3 years from the end of 1914 to early 1918, the Western Front ...

    If these Generals could practice fighting this way using new training methods then maybe they would have seen the sheer power of these dangerous weapons then they could plan offensives accordingly. The problem was that there was only one place for the Generals to try out tactics and offensives, and that was on the battlefield.

  2. The development of a Stalemate

    Russians as they had mobilised earlier than predicted and had already invaded Germany. This was the chance that the French and British had been waiting for. Also the Germans had run out of food and supplies as they had advanced to quickly, so the soldiers were underfed and exhausted.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work