• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

With close reference used to dramatic methods, discuss Shakespeares portrayal of Hotspur in Act 3 Scene 1.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐With close reference used to dramatic methods, discuss Shakespeare?s portrayal of Hotspur in Act 3 Scene 1. Hotspur has several ongoing characteristics in the play, with the main one that is constantly being brought forward is his egotism that shows in his interaction with other characters. In line 16, after listening to Glendower?s boast, Hotspur feels that his ego has been threatened. This character development tells us that Hotspur doesn?t like to be outshone by others. ?Why, so can I, or so can any man, but will they come when you do call for them?? Hotspur?s taunting tone is shown here as he claims anyone can do what Glendower says he can do, but questions if it will actually work, belittling him. ?Methinks my moiety, north from Burton here, in quantity equals not one of yours.? Hotspur believes he deserves more, and he would re-route the channel to get his way; ?And here the smug and silver Trent shall run in a new channel, fair and evenly. ...read more.

Middle

?Let me not understand you, then; speak it in Welsh.? This recurring characteristic adds character development to Hotspur. When it comes to plot development, Hotspur forgetting the map at the start of the scene shows that he is impractical and has a lack of foresight. Also, his lack of sophistication and refinement is shown when he insults literature, meaning Shakespeare portrays Hotspur as very uncultured. His fiery and argumentative side is exhibited with his use of imagery in the scene, however his political naivety in also revealed as he allows personal feelings to intrude on his personal relationships, and presents his lack of diplomatic maturity. Hotspur?s arrogance is exposed when he begins arguing for the sake of arguing after interaction with Glendower in a battle of wills makes Hotspur boast after Glendower gives in, and once again feeds into his egotistical side. Another thing established in this scene is Hotspur?s reputation, as after more interaction with Glendower, he reveals what others say about him and that he has a renowned, infamous and fearsome reputation. ...read more.

Conclusion

Heart, you swear like a comfit-maker?s wife!? He tries one last time to convince her ?Come, sing.? But she still won?t, to which he leaves in anger; ?I?ll away within these two hours, and so come in when ye will.? and leaves her in tears. Hotspur disregards other?s feelings and wishes, even his Lady?s. This brings up Hotspur?s cruel ways and his childlike actions when he does not get his way, along with his selfishness, and his irresponsibility towards his personal relationships. In this scene, Shakespeare continues to portray Hotspur with a mocking attitude, a hot tempered mind, his open mind and the fact that he is a ruthless fighter, and starts to bring up his self centered, impatient and immature acts, that is mainly brought to our attention through his interaction with other characters and his actions during heated and normal moments, from battle, to conversations in the Boar?s Head Tavern. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other works section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other works essays

  1. Taking into consideration of the language and structure of the play, how would you ...

    Here I would have Richard on his knees with his breast shown as directed but with his arms drawn towards Anne. I would have her hold the sword to him with one outstretched hand, as if the other one is trying to stop her and pull her away.

  2. A comparison (up to the end of Act 3) of the 'courts' of Henry ...

    The Lord w as the opposite of his wild brother, and was quick to take on responsibility in the King's councils. Another interested in the affairs of the land was the Earl of Westmoreland. He was an ally to the King and was loyal and trusted.

  1. The contrast between Hotspur and Hal is the main theme in Henry IV part ...

    Hal has no pride in himself until his reformation when he becomes the prince he should be. Hotspur shows his dislike for rhetoric and his love of truth in Act III. Glendower talks of disturbances of a heavenly and earthly nature at his birth "at my birth the front of heaven was full of fiery shapes", Hotspur contradicts these comments.

  2. Consider How Shakespeare Presents and Develops the Character of Prince Hal and Hotspur In ...

    After the king leaves, we see Hotspur is so enraged that he even refers to King Henry's predecessor as 'that sweet lovely rose.' Shakespeare uses this passionate outburst to show Hotspur's unstable temperament. We see that Hotspur has decided to take a stand against the King even though he knows it will have dire consequences.

  1. To what extent does the tragedy of Titus Andronicus unfold from the protagonist and ...

    Titus' support then leads Saturninus to choose Lavinia as his future empress. In the Hopkins interpretation of the play we see Bassianus and Lavinia together, and so immediately we know of Titus' awareness of their relationship, Titus' hesitance leads to the impression that he would object to the arrangement however

  2. who in your opinion is the true hero of Henry the fourth part 1

    Hotspur quickly reverts to childish behaviour whereas by comparison Hal becomes mighty and noble. Having won the favor of the audience he is positioned perfectly to rise into the plays hero. From the beginning of the play the audience perceive Hal as a villain, in Act 1 Scene 1, the king rains abuse upon Hal's name.

  1. Write a dramatic monologue in the style of Aaron reflecting on the motivation for ...

    Enter Tamora alone with Aaron (466 words) The commentary: Within the first few sentences of the monologue I have used an extended metaphor. ?Constantly conquering the smell of seduction that passes via the left nostril,? this is showing what Aaron is mainly focusing on throughout this monologue.

  2. Coriolanus, write a critical appreciation of the following passage, (Act 1, Scene 1, 146-210) ...

    Rome, and expressing the belief that war is like a medicine that cleanses society, killing of the excess population. The image echoes a popular medical practice in Shakespeare?s time: bloodletting. Doctors drained blood from a sick person, believing that an excess of blood caused the illness.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work