• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Words are more treacherous and powerful than we think". Evaluate the extent to which the characteristics Sartre claims for words affect - negatively or positively - the different areas of knowing

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Viktor Olmin TOK Essay Question 5 "Words are more treacherous and powerful than we think". Evaluate the extent to which the characteristics Sartre claims for words affect - negatively or positively - the different areas of knowing "Words are more treacherous and powerful than we think". Just reading the question makes me wonder whether this essay will in fact ever have any potential since it may have multiple meanings that I have failed to take into account. How will I ever know that what I write has any meaning? Jean-Paul Sartre, the great French existentialist philosopher, was revolutionary in his views on life and the meaning of life. Existentialism is a term that is defined through philosophy, literature and emphasises individual existence, freedom and choice. Existentialists believe that human existence is completely oblivious to the world around us; that we are solitary creatures created for no specific purpose. They insist that individuals must live their lives without the aid of the standards of society, as these will not lead you to the truth. ...read more.

Middle

As the existentialists claimed, to find the real truth one must be a first person observer, or else the real truth will get lost in the restatements of the historians. One of the major themes within existentialism is the freedom of choice. Unlike other living creatures on our planet, human beings do not have a fixed nature; rather we create our own nature through our own choices. Thus our nature is what we say it is, which can be extremely ambiguous. This makes the whole concept of ethics rather sketchy, since ethics is a set or principles or conduct set by society. If we choose to make these rules, then we should also be allowed to choose to break them, and so there is a serious clash of believes between existentialism and traditional philosophy. Ethics is our reasoning, our choices, what we perceive to be good or bad, wrong or right. Since language is what humans use to reason within our heads, one may ask what good is, or what is right? ...read more.

Conclusion

Hence, when someone asks "Vad har du f�r bevis?", how do you interpret it? Is the person asking for evidence or for proof? This problem is applicable to all languages and translating between them, and poses a large problem to language aspect of the TOK wheel. Since literature is written in every language in the world, there is a large demand for translation between languages so that everyone can read it. For someone translating works to another language they will always find words that are specific in one language, but don't have a perfect match in the other, and so he has to choose between synonyms of the word. The translated work will to some degree loose its original meaning since the author choose his words carefully to mean one specific thing (or, to choose a word that is ambiguous). In the translation the meaning may not be as specific or ambiguous any more. As a result we loose meaning, we loose truth, since we are not given the exact words of the first hand observer, the author of the work. 1 http://www.connect.net/ron/exist.html ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Language: Context, Genre & Frameworks essays

  1. An exploration of the extent in which childrens TV presenters accommodate to the participants ...

    Similarly, the participants responded with colloquial and informal lexis and grammar, which indicated accommodation between presenter and participant. However the Raven presenter used more formal lexis and grammar, and also tended to use archaic linguistic choices, which meant that there was less accommodation between Raven and his participants.

  2. Creative writing and commentary. It was the year 2015 and Earth was exploring ...

    want to keep you safe" A few minutes later the pod landed on Earth, it opened up and they got out, they were about a mile away from the house so they had to walk there. Ramani took Rachel's hand again and they started walking.

  1. Knowledge that is difficult to describe in words. Does this mean that other Ways ...

    Does this mean that people immediately know how to do something? Although I'm not good with literature, I'm good at drawing. But I couldn't draw from birth and I went through lots of practice. This indicates that one doesn't know how to do something form birth but has to acquire the knowledge.

  2. Compare and contrast knowing a friend to knowing how to swim, knowing a scientific ...

    Knowledge differs enormously, for knowing where you left your keys and knowing how to play soccer are completely different pieces of knowledge, obtained in completely different ways. Knowledge of facts is called explicit knowledge, while knowledge of skills is called implicit knowledge.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work