Write a comparison between Jessie Pope's 'Who's for the Game?' and Mackintosh's 'Recruiting' considering the content, form and language in the poems.

Authors Avatar

Write a comparison between Jessie Pope’s ‘Who’s for the Game?’ and Mackintosh’s ‘Recruiting’ considering the content, form and language in the poems.

  EA Mackintosh’s ‘Recruiting’ and Jessie Pope's 'Who's for the Game?' are both effective poems to look at when making a comparison between  views of war in poetry, since there is definite contrast between the two. The primary difference is that Mackintosh’s poem is very much anti-war whereas Pope’s poem takes a pro-war stance. As the poems are so fundamentally different in their approach to the topic it is not surprising that the rhyming schemes and language employed are also different.

   Jessie Pope’s ‘Who’s for the Game?’ presentation of war is quite different to that of Mackintosh, she is very pro war and does not regard it to be a life ending opportunity. With her poem she is actively trying to recruit young men, she attempts to do so by aiming her poem at the ordinary working classes, for this she uses everyday language.  She writes in a conversational manner, which makes the poem more memorable and persuasive. She uses tactics in her poem to persuade men to join up; one of them is comparing the war to a ‘game’, implying that there is little danger on the battlefield. She also refers to the war as a sport where a player would return with a minor injury such as a crutch.

Join now!

  Within the poem, Pope uses many questions, which involve the reader more and together with the use of everyday language gives the poem a less formal feel. Her use of anaphora regarding the word ‘who’ allows the message to be stored with the reader and has a slight brain washing effect to it. She persuades the men to join the army by making them feel deceitful and cowardly if they were to stay at home. She also has a friendly manner in her propaganda poem as she refers to the men as ‘lads’. She pressurises the men into joining ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

There are some insightful analytical comments in this essay and there is evidence of engagement with the texts and comparative ability. Wider reading and background reading is also evident, as contextual comments are offered. To improve, the essay requires some structural re-organisation to ensure a more coherent argument is conveyed. This can begin at the planning stages where topics for analysis need to be decided, such as use of imagery, voice/tone of the poem, structural features etc. These can then form more substantial paragraphs that use, as a guide, a clear topic sentence, evidence from the poem, analysis, and contextual reference if relevant. As it is here, a comparative essay can be written analysing one poem first, then addressing the second, although the second half of the essay needs to refer back to the first poem. Another way to structure the essay is to integrate analysis of both poems throughout, using aspects of narrative as listed above to compare and contrast throughout. Three stars ***