Is Space Exploration Morally Justified?

Authors Avatar

James Fearnley

Is Space Exploration Morally Justified?

Columbia Space shuttle

On February the first, 2003, the Columbia space shuttle broke up as it re-entered the earth’s atmosphere. The astronauts onboard the shuttle all tragically died. The accident left people wandering if mankind’s urge to explore and need to understand has gone too far or is the Columbia Space shuttle crash just a set back in the long and ever ambitious programme for space exploration?

What happened to the seven astronauts on the Columbia space shuttle is a tragedy. However, I am not someone who believes that we were destined to explore space and I believe it has nothing to do with fate and even if it were destined that mankind is to become a space exploring race, then a strategy would not involve active participation in accomplishing that fate. We should continue to explore space as we have gained a substantial amount of useful information and will continue to which may affect the way we live our lives.

Some people believe that space exploration is too dangerous. The technology is relatively untested and should be examined to a closer degree to stop disasters such as the Columbia space shuttle from happening. This could be seen as a valid argument because there is a long list of accidents that have occurred which are related to space exploration. However, each astronaut will accept that their job is dangerous and death is not impossible, this is why we have hailed some astronauts as heroes, because of their bravery in the face of death. These people may believe that space exploration should be left solely to machinery and robotic missions. However this costs money, and a lot of it. Billions of pounds have been spent. Another argument that is related to this one is an accusation made against NASA. NASA has had to take some substantial budget cuts and has come under serious pressure from the US government, although the government is responsible for the pay cuts. These people complain that the shuttle technology is 30 years old and the argument has a lot of truth in it; however, I do feel it is unfair to lay all the blame at NASA’s door. Their contributions to space exploration are unquestionable. It is a valid point that space exploration must continue but changes have to be made to ensure that the technology is safe and up to date.

Join now!

Another strong argument is that space exploration and the research into it is a waste of money, money which could be used to help suffering people around the world. These people may say that expenditure on space exploration does not directly benefit mankind but research to halt the spread of diseases such as aids does. This is not entirely true but I know space exploration is not always successful and may be seen as money being ‘thrown away’. I also believe that the governments of the most economically developed countries should give more money to undeveloped countries so they ...

This is a preview of the whole essay