• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Motorbikes Be Banned In Public Places

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should Motorbikes Be Banned In Public Places? Last Sunday, I was out on the usual Sunday cycle with friends when 7 monster motorbikes came roaring past and up the steep muddy hill that we was cycling down. It was only when we had to pedal downhill through the churned up tracks of the motorbikes that I realised the problems that motorbikes cause. At that moment I began to ask myself should there be a ban on motorbikes in public places; or is it too late? I have arrived at the conclusion that motorbikes should be banned because they damage the ground on which they ride, if they are ridden irresponsibly. This makes walking, cycling and other activities un-enjoyable. It also causes a big expense for places such as the 'Brecon Beacons' National Park because at present they have to embark on a �90,000 project to repair the damage caused by motorbikes. The 'Pennine Way' in Pen-y-Ghent area has spent six million pounds to helicopter in stone to stop motorbikes from riding in certain areas. Finally the 'Lake District' has spent one million pounds on repairing footpaths that have been ripped up by motorbikes. ...read more.

Middle

If riders feel that there aren't enough of these places around then they should do something about it such as approach the local council or something along those lines. People should consider where they are going to ride them before they are purchased. If these motorbike users keep on using the tracks and trails that they are using at the moment, then there will we nothing left for the public to use except muddy, torn up, unusable ground. This is why I think there should be a ban on such vehicles in public places. On the other hand, if motorbikes were ridden sensibly like they are designed for then there probably wouldn't be such a problem. The problem is that there are more irresponsible riders, outweighing the responsible riders, which causes this problem. This means that all motorbike riders have to be treated the same. Most motorbikes are fitted with road legal silencers and are fairly quiet but also noise pollution is very small. These sorts of bikes don't really bother that many people because they are not much noisier than the ordinary car, especially when ridden sensibly. ...read more.

Conclusion

They also make no effort or contribution to repairing existing damage and don't seem that bothered about it either. Why should they continue to damage the ground upon which they ride, and why not accept responsibility for damage to the landscape or even try to do something about it? This irresponsibility showed by riders is why I continue to agree with the ban motorbikes in public places. Overall I have considered both sides to the argument on 'Banning motorbikes in public places' and have finally come up with the side of the argument that I support. I have chose support the 'for' side of the argument to ban motorbikes in public places. The main reason for me supporting the 'for' side of the argument is due to the degree of 'irresponsibility' shown by motorbikes riders. Also the lack of effort and contribution shown to repairing the problems with the ground used influenced me to take the 'for' side of the argument. However, I do have to agree that at present, there are limited places to ride motorbikes but only of irresponsibility in the past. This does not change my decision on motorbikes in public places and I think they should be banned. Do you agree? ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level General Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level General Studies essays

  1. How far does non-verbal communication (NVC) regulate conversation?

    Speaking with your back turned or looking at the floor or ceiling should be avoided as it communicates disinterest or boredom. Proximity is a factor that has to be considered dependent upon the relationship between the people involved in the communication.

  2. The Road

    More often than not in Jimmy's case it seems like he remembers more of the bad times, for example his parents never remembered his birthday, "his father would put them all through an awkward excuse about this really, really special and important date had somehow just slid out of his head (50)."

  1. Legalized gambling brings big revenue for the cities.

    It can be an alternative to raising taxes. Casinos bring more business to hotels, restaurants, and other such businesses. (Mcgraw and Hill, 1970) We need to look at the other side of these facts. Does the Casino bring wealth to the community? "The Local economies are increases and employment rises 10 percent, but this enlargement provides no benefits to the residents.

  2. Should boxing be banned?

    Short term injuries like a cut eye and long term as in "punch drunk syndrome" which is like Parkinson's disease, a fine example of this is Mohamed Ali. Brain damage and brain hemerages can also happen to boxers who are repeatively hit over the head.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work