• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A survey of the river Alyn in Wales

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction On Monday 5th of July we went and conducted a survey of the river Alyn in Wales, in Loggerheads. We looked at 4 river sections and did several tests to find the velocity, width and depth of the river we also recorded the sizes of 30 pebbles from each section. We did this to test a number of hypotheses. It took us approximately an hour and a half to arrive there and the weather was bright and warm with little cloud cover, this was quite unexpected because on previous weeks it had been raining. The sites we visited were: (187,575)(188,198)(174,617)(196,629)(please see map on next page) Hypotheses * Is velocity related to depth? * Do the particles in the bedload of a river become more rounded downstream? * Is the pebble size related to discharge? For the first hypothesis I expect to find that the deeper the river the more velocity, I think this because there is going to be more water so therefore more pressure in the river. For my second hypothesis I expect to find that the particles are more rounded down stream because the friction in the river should wear them down more and round them off. And lastly for my third hypothesis I think that the size of the pebble is not related to discharge because discharge ...read more.

Middle

34 20 64 30 51 67 34 44 42 40 39 27 40 37 58 74 90 43 53 32 34 35 40 25 42 41 68 b 17 13 25 21 22 41 28 38 20 24 39 32 34 30 17 30 20 39 40 55 32 43 30 24 25 34 24 15 28 37 c 12 54 34 2 9 20 16 19 20 14 24 12 18 11 7 16 17 26 36 24 13 19 17 13 16 16 8 20 21 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 A 1.5 2.0 3.2 43 80 110 72 51 20 12 7 18 8 7 12 14 18 76 58 60 60 61 31 39 21 53 32 19 54 130 b 1.2 1.1 1.6 15 65 50 38 39 12 7 4 11 6 5 7 6 9 28 39 39 40 26 24 26 14 26 16 9 36 64 c 0.9 0.3 0.7 17 25 45 12 20 5 6 1 7 2 1 5 4 4 18 20 14 29 24 16 16 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.3 11 56 First 30 pebbles at random from the third section of ...read more.

Conclusion

For example the pebble sizes may not be completely correct due to the fact that not all pebbles have been caught in the river's flow (some may have been thrown in there or have recently fallen from the rivers banks.) another factor that caused a problem was with the moel famau stream we visited. The width of the stream was a lot smaller than previous rivers we visited, and therefore made it harder to test velocity (the orange used was too large so we used a bottle cap instead) and also as it was only 2.2 metres wide, we had to convert it into centimetres. Problems such as these are to be expected though and cannot be helped. Factors that could perhaps be helped are things like the tape measure not starting at zero (mentioned earlier) to fix this problem we could perhaps attach string or some other kind of material to the end of the tape and fasten that to the poles instead. Conclusion Revisiting my information I have I have concluded that velocity is not related to depth. I have also proved that particles in the bed load of the river do become more rounded downstream. Finally, I have again proved my theory that discharge is not related to pebble size. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology essays

  1. Hydrology and Fluvial geomorphology. (Q&A)

    Q: Explanation formation on the following river features: ox-bow lakes, meanders, slip off slopes, rejuvenation and knick points. Suggested Answer Meanders are bends in a river. When water flows round a meander the fastest current is on the outside of the bend.

  2. How does the Efficiency and Cross-Sectional Area of a River Change Down Stream?

    Conclusion The main purpose of my investigation was to find out how the cross-sectional area and efficiency changed down stream, by looking at the velocity of the stream, the inner and outer friction and the cross-sectional area. I also calculated the hydraulic radius so I could see the efficiency of the stream.

  1. How does Loughton Brook change as it moves downstream?

    This is because sometimes there was some leaf litter in the river restricting the cork from flowing with the water. To extend the study I could have investigated the changes in valley shape. This would have been useful to make a comparison with river efficiency.

  2. Geography investigation - The River Skirfare located in the Littondale region in the Yorkshire ...

    The short axis does not provide such convincing evidence, but still supports the hypothesis with a difference of 3.75mm in Arncliffe's favour. The reason for such a small difference in the short axis can be identified when looking at anomalies in the results.

  1. Investigating the river Caerfanell

    N.B Do not take a reading from the edges. It has to be taken in the flow of the water where friction is minimal. - At each of these markings, to take a velocity reading, place the impeller underneath the water.

  2. 'To what extent does the River Lyn conform to the Bradshaw model of River ...

    Rs can be used to discover if there is an association between two sets of measurements. The measurement levels I will use are interval levels. Fig. 24 This scatter graph shows the distance from the source and the velocity. Now I will draw a table to work out the Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient.

  1. Geograpgy glendun river

    gives it a steep gradient as the river is trying to cut downwards to get level this is also why there is only vertical erosion at the source. There river has most velocity at the mouth. We should expect to find at: Upper course - This part of the river

  2. Compare the observations and recordings made at the two sites with predictions made from ...

    sides and a deeper, smoother bed without large boulders obstructing the flow. The increased area and velocity should together result in an obvious gain in discharge. Although the lack of intercepting vegetation and peaty soil type at Site 1 are typical factors in the increase of discharge, I do not

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work