• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A survey of the river Alyn in Wales

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction On Monday 5th of July we went and conducted a survey of the river Alyn in Wales, in Loggerheads. We looked at 4 river sections and did several tests to find the velocity, width and depth of the river we also recorded the sizes of 30 pebbles from each section. We did this to test a number of hypotheses. It took us approximately an hour and a half to arrive there and the weather was bright and warm with little cloud cover, this was quite unexpected because on previous weeks it had been raining. The sites we visited were: (187,575)(188,198)(174,617)(196,629)(please see map on next page) Hypotheses * Is velocity related to depth? * Do the particles in the bedload of a river become more rounded downstream? * Is the pebble size related to discharge? For the first hypothesis I expect to find that the deeper the river the more velocity, I think this because there is going to be more water so therefore more pressure in the river. For my second hypothesis I expect to find that the particles are more rounded down stream because the friction in the river should wear them down more and round them off. And lastly for my third hypothesis I think that the size of the pebble is not related to discharge because discharge ...read more.

Middle

34 20 64 30 51 67 34 44 42 40 39 27 40 37 58 74 90 43 53 32 34 35 40 25 42 41 68 b 17 13 25 21 22 41 28 38 20 24 39 32 34 30 17 30 20 39 40 55 32 43 30 24 25 34 24 15 28 37 c 12 54 34 2 9 20 16 19 20 14 24 12 18 11 7 16 17 26 36 24 13 19 17 13 16 16 8 20 21 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 A 1.5 2.0 3.2 43 80 110 72 51 20 12 7 18 8 7 12 14 18 76 58 60 60 61 31 39 21 53 32 19 54 130 b 1.2 1.1 1.6 15 65 50 38 39 12 7 4 11 6 5 7 6 9 28 39 39 40 26 24 26 14 26 16 9 36 64 c 0.9 0.3 0.7 17 25 45 12 20 5 6 1 7 2 1 5 4 4 18 20 14 29 24 16 16 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.3 11 56 First 30 pebbles at random from the third section of ...read more.

Conclusion

For example the pebble sizes may not be completely correct due to the fact that not all pebbles have been caught in the river's flow (some may have been thrown in there or have recently fallen from the rivers banks.) another factor that caused a problem was with the moel famau stream we visited. The width of the stream was a lot smaller than previous rivers we visited, and therefore made it harder to test velocity (the orange used was too large so we used a bottle cap instead) and also as it was only 2.2 metres wide, we had to convert it into centimetres. Problems such as these are to be expected though and cannot be helped. Factors that could perhaps be helped are things like the tape measure not starting at zero (mentioned earlier) to fix this problem we could perhaps attach string or some other kind of material to the end of the tape and fasten that to the poles instead. Conclusion Revisiting my information I have I have concluded that velocity is not related to depth. I have also proved that particles in the bed load of the river do become more rounded downstream. Finally, I have again proved my theory that discharge is not related to pebble size. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology essays

  1. Hydrology and Fluvial geomorphology. (Q&A)

    upon the flood plain or to use the water in some way. Further research is needed how humans alter various aspects of the drainage basin and how this then affects the river and the drainage basin system. For example, water can be taken from rivers to use for irrigation, to use as drinking water and for cooling in industries.

  2. How does the Efficiency and Cross-Sectional Area of a River Change Down Stream?

    10 2.579008 4 0.35 5 -1 1 11 3.535335 2 0.02 12 -10 100 12 4.22065 1 0.15 11 -10 100 sum 341 Fig. 11. Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient between hydraulic radius and velocity I now need to use the data from the table above to calculate the correlation coefficient,

  1. Geography investigation - The River Skirfare located in the Littondale region in the Yorkshire ...

    As in the previous section, the size of material will be the first to be dealt with. This hypothesis is very strongly supported by the data that was collected. This is seen especially in the graph titled; 'Average Material Size at Halton Gill and Arncliffe'.

  2. Investigating the river Caerfanell

    this then leads to the reading being subjective to the person taking them which can cause inaccurate results. - The turbulence of water makes depth difficult to read. This data can be used to calculate the cross sectional area of the river AN AVERAGE VELOCITY OF RIVER * A Braystone

  1. 'To what extent does the River Lyn conform to the Bradshaw model of River ...

    0.198 m/s 0.0277 + (3.2805 � time in seconds) 2 0.0277 + (3.2805 � 15.32) 0.242 m/s 0.0277 + (3.2805 � time in seconds) 3 0.0277 + (3.2805 � 4.603) 0.740 m/s 0.0277 + (3.2805 � time in seconds) 4 0.0277 + (3.2805 � 5.71) 0.602 m/s 0.0277 + (3.2805 � time in seconds)

  2. Geograpgy glendun river

    The load size varies a lot from source to mouth getting smaller and smaller as you travel down stream. There are large angular boulders at the source and small pebbles and dust like particles in the river The source of the river is much higher than the mouth and this

  1. Compare the observations and recordings made at the two sites with predictions made from ...

    It is calculated by multiplying the average velocity (ms-1) of the river by its cross-sectional area (m2), giving the discharge as cubic metres per second - cumecs (m3s-1). Downstream at Site 2, I predict that the cross-sectional area will be larger than that at Site 1 because the river will have had enough energy and bedload to erode wider

  2. A study into the bed load of the River Lemon

    The culvert in Newton Abbot was too small to cope with the amount of water and �3.6 million worth of damage was done. In 1982 a dam was completed on the Lemon, called the Holbeam dam. This dam reduces the water flow when there is danger of a flood, and an adjacent field is flooded.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work