• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

Consider the Defining Features of Dependency Theory and distinguish its Major Variants. Discuss the Extent to which it is an Illuminating Way of Analysing the Problem of Underdevelopment.

Extracts from this document...


CONSIDER THE DEFINING FEATURES OF DEPENDENCY THEORY AND DISTINGUISH ITS MAJOR VARIANTS. DISCUSS THE EXTENT TO WHICH IT IS AN ILLUMINATING WAY OF ANALYSING THE PROBLEM OF UNDERDEVELOPMENT "Studies of dependency, constitute part of the constantly renewed effort to re-establish a tradition of analysis of economic structures and structures of domination; one that would not suffocate the historical process by removing it from the movement which results from the permanent struggle among groups and classes..."1 (Cardoso, 1977) Of all the approaches to development, in particular Latin American development, in the last 25 years, none has had deeper or more pervasive influence than the dependency perspective. The dependency theory has influenced every social-science discipline, some humanities and various applied professional fields. What began in the late 1960's as a challenge, entered the mainstream and became the new orthodoxy in scholarly areas and beyond. "dependency explanations... are no longer confined to academic sanctuaries; they are now common currency of a growing body of generals, bishops, editors, chiefs of state, even Latin American businessmen."2 (Falcoff, 1980) Mark Falcoff, as illustrated above, noted the growing influence of the dependency perspective in his writings about Latin America. The origins of dependency theory emerged from the convergence of two major intellectual trends; one with its background in Marxism and the other rooted in Latin American structuralism. Dependency theory is, however, mainly built on the ideas of structuralists, specifically Raul Prebisch's distinction between the centre and the periphery. In this distinction, the centre was seen as the cause and the periphery as the effect. ...read more.


Surplus extraction is the mechanism of its own perpetuation. As capital accumulation is being drained away from the periphery, it creates an increasing dependence on the centre for flows of foreign capital and technology. Secondly, technological dependency, which is brought about by the absence of an indigenous capacity in the periphery. Dos Santos sees technological dependence as the key to the dependency situation and also the key to escaping from the situation of dependency. Only with a fully developed capital goods sector, can the periphery require an indigenous technological capacity for self-sufficient expansion. If a dependent peripheral economy can establish a high degree of productive autonomy, by developing an important capital goods sector in the economy. Then, it is argued that foreign capital will lose its capacity to determine the character of peripheral development. However, surplus extraction through multinationals, prevents this development of the capital goods sector. Therefore, we end up with industrial stagnation of the periphery, but this is also due to many other reasons, including, failure to carry out land reform and failure to change the distribution of income, to name a few. Finally, the powerful presence of multinationals in the periphery. Both surplus extraction and technological dependence, are factors that derive from the presence of multinationals. Multinationals would be negatively affected by full-integrated industrialisation of the periphery, according to dependency writers. So, the multinationals must come up with a way to prevent this industrialisation form occurring. Exports of a wide range of particular capital goods are also essential for the prevailing dominance of the centre, so steps must be taken to ensure that peripheral industrialisation does not occur. ...read more.


The situation of underdevelopment came about when commercial capitalism and then industrial capitalism expanded and linked to the world market non-industrial economies that went on to occupy different positions in the overall structure of the capitalist system. Therefore, a difference exists among the developed and under-developed economies, not only of the stage and the state of the production system, but also of the function and position within the international economic structure of production and distribution. The concept of underdevelopment refers to a type of economic system with a predominant primary sector, a high concentration of income, little diversification in its production system and overall, an external market far outweighing the internal market. Dependency theory illustrates many important ideas and provides relevant analysis to the problem of underdevelopment. It explains the emergence of underdevelopment and seeks to provide an explanation for it. Dependency theory highlights how the peripheral economies can overcome the situation of dependency, as a result of underdevelopment. Even though the peripheral countries are 'restricted' in their own development, in that, they must wait for the centre economies to fully develop, before they can begin to reduce their dependency on the them and develop themselves. We can see that the dependency theory does provide us with some explanation and solution of the problem of underdevelopment. Regardless of the fact that in a practical setting, for the periphery to overcome underdevelopment, it is a long process, that is relies on the development of the centre, for it's own expansion. CONSIDER THE DEFINING FEATURES OF DEPENDENCY THEORY AND DISTINGUISH ITS MAJOR VARIANTS. DISCUSS THE EXTENT TO WHICH IT IS AN ILLUMINATING WAY OF ANALYSING THE PROBLEM OF UNDERDEVELOPMENT. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Global Interdependence & Economic Transition section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Global Interdependence & Economic Transition essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Referring to both pharmaceutical and tobacco companies, explain how transnational corporations can influence the ...

    5 star(s)

    Although, like pharmaceutical companies, they provide employment for local people, they are often only few tobacco plant farmers and are paid very little and do not receive the healthcare that pharmaceutical companies provide. So, in LEDCs tobacco companies are having a very bad effect as they cause many life-threatening diseases

  2. Assess the extent to which Trans National Corporations (TNCs) have a positive impact ...

    This is the basic remedy for the success of the way TNC's work. Additionally an absence of strictly enforced international laws means that TNC's may operate in LEDC's in a way that would not be allowed in an MEDC. They may pollute the environment, run risks with safety or impose poor working conditions and low wages on the local workers.

  1. The Modernisation Theory is the only accurate way of defining development. Assess the arguments ...

    This is evident in contemporary events, with countries such as Zimbabwe under a authoritarian dictator needing Western intervention and support. Nevertheless, one may argue that the modernisation theory is being ethnocentric in assuming that the values of LEDCs hold then back, and western ones are superior.

  2. Can developing countries ever catch up with developed countries

    In such a context of international exploitation, the critical perspective on development seems more plausible than the idea that internal changes will lead to a "catch-up". The debt trap is another reason why "catch-up" is a myth. In the 1970s, "western banks lent money hand over fist so that cash

  1. What are the factors that led to contemporary differences in development between countries?

    Finally one of the key factors that led to the contemporary differences in development between an LEDC like Haiti and a NIC like South Korea is the effect natural disasters has had . South Korea has had natural disasters ranging from mudslides ,earthquakes and typhoons but they pale in comparison to Haitian disasters .

  2. Newly industrialised countries have been, and continue to be, the driving force of globalisation. ...

    This is because the living standards of many are improving, and this also means that the children that Indians have often now survive to working age. In the past, many children died from diseases contracted from contaminated water and this led to a triangle-shaped population pyramid with many young dependants and few elderly dependants.

  1. What is Dependency Theory and how does it apply to development?

    Actually, there isn?t only one unified Dependency Theory. Nevertheless, there are some main propositions to inspire the analyses of most dependency theorists: Firstly, dependency illustrates the international system with two sets of states, usually described as dominant/dependent, center/periphery or even metropolitan/satellite. The dominant states are the industrially developed and advanced countries in the OECD (Organization of Economic Co- operation and Development).

  2. Globalisation is mainly an economic process. Discuss

    Another reason why China is an example of this is because when it joined the world trade organisation also known as the WTO, this means that they have the ability to trade more freely and so become more globalised, this lead to an increase in demand for exports from overseas

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work