• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Deforestation in Amazonia

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Deforestation in Amazonia The Amazon rainforest is the world's largest rainforest situated in Brail of South America and consequently suffers the most deforestation in the world. Deforestation is the cause for the destruction of the Amazon and rapidly becoming the most reliable method for access to resources such as wood. The countries of Amazonia are poor, less developed countries that rely on the resources of the Amazon rainforest to become richer, more developed countries. However, some people think that they can only do this by destroying the rainforest forever. The trees of the rainforest can be sold for wood (timber). This timber is in great demand in economically developed countries like Britain, Japan and USA. Accordingly, as it is in great demand, there are many advantages as well as disadvantages of the deforestation of the trees in the Amazon. There are many people that have an interest in the rainforest such as the large companies in the developed countries who buy the raw materials such as the wood from the rainforest. The business of trade of the materials would most likely improve the developing countries like Peru and Brazil as the government would profit exceedingly and could use the money to build roads or provide the materials for buildings and schools or hospitals as a way to improve the country. As the company will be a transnational company, there will be many, many jobs created in both the developing and developed countries involved in the business thus improving the standard of living for many people in both types of countries. ...read more.

Middle

However, there are many disadvantages of the use of the rainforest in this method. The deforestation process leaves the soil useless as it becomes infertile and insecure. This is because the roots of the trees once held the soil together, to prevent it from collapsing, and a lot of the nutrients in the soil were also provided by the trees. In this way landless farmers are once again left not benefiting from this use of the rainforest. Deforestation also adds to the problem of the destruction of the scenery which natural conservationists and tourists of the rainforest would be against, and also because of the extinction of a variety of different species of animals and plants. The deforested land could then be used for cattle ranches which a few local people would profit from because jobs would be created on the ranches. There would also be one problem that the workers would face on the cattle ranch. As the land has been deforested it will be unlikely that grass will grow which is vital to the cattle for grazing. Therefore the cattle would not be as healthy and the food produce from the cattle would not be as appealing to the richer countries. . However, this problem is only small scale and the grass would grow back eventually. For that reason, workers on cattle ranches would be in favour of this use of the rainforest. On the other hand, workers on plantation farms would find it difficult to grow fundamental crops such as sugar, rubber, and coffee plants as the soil would be infertile. ...read more.

Conclusion

Many people could argue here that more land would be needed if all the minerals in that area have been extracted. Interestingly, the solution to this has already been introduced and encouraged by many: recycling. Most of the materials can be recycled such as aluminium from the bauxite extracted as well as the iron and this environmentally friendly method could cause less destruction of the rainforest. My idea also suggests that although ecotourism is the most eco-friendly and causes the least destruction, this should also be controlled. To maintain sustainability of the rainforest without entirely abandoning ecotourism, restrictions should be made on exactly how much development of the tourist industry should be allowed in the rainforest. Although the country will become further developed with many jobs created and tourists from developed countries staying in hotels many shops set up profiting from tourism etc, problems such as the destruction of the rainforest will arise from this. More land will be required for this sort of development and this will cause more devastation of the rainforest, making it unsustainable. Therefore restrictions would preserve the sustainability of the uses of the rainforest without causing future harm to the rainforest itself. Fencing off areas that have restrictions from extracting minerals and slashing trees for timber is another way to make sure that ecotourism will be persistent in the rainforest as they fenced off areas will be preserved for the tourists, plus natural conservationists will be satisfied as well. In conclusion, my proposition is better than others as my solution maintains the development of many of the uses of the Amazon rainforest without causing too much destruction because I have made limitations to each use of the rainforest to maintain the sustainability of the rainforest's natural environment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Environmental Management section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Environmental Management essays

  1. The Development of the Travel and Tourism Industry After World War II

    * Diseases Some countries are also loosing tourist because of diseases like Sars and foot and mouth because people don't like to travel to somewhere where they could catch something and can't even go there. Britain lost a lot of tourists a couple of years ago through foot and mouth.

  2. What is Deforestation?

    When trees grow, they need to fix carbon dioxide that it is in the air for personal purposes. They need to synthesise carbohydrates, fats and proteins that are the main constituents of a tree. But when trees decompose after they have been cut down, they release that carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere.

  1. A Local Ecosystem-Mt Keira

    25,000 Coachwood trees were estimated to be present in 250 hectares, while only 10,000 Moreton Bay Fig, Sweet Pittosporum, Jackwood, Red Cedar, Brush Cherry, Native Tamarind, Churnwood and Flame Tree were estimated to be present per 250 hectares. Discussion: 1.

  2. Evaluate the impact of deforestation in Indonesia.

    Areas of forest that have not been felled must be carefully preserved and remain untouched. Many such areas can become wildlife reserves and national parks. They may have tourist potential, providing valuable income for a developing nation if such development can be achieved without causing damage to the forest.

  1. Advantage and Disadvantage of Human Impact on Rainforest

    Not only has this fallen into the category of agriculture, cash crops and cattle ranching are also a part of it. From a rancher's point of view, they just want to clear out the rainforest for cattle. The rainforest that have not been destroyed are being cleared for food crops, tree plantation or for grazing cattle.

  2. What are the effects of Deforestation?

    the tropical soils are acidic, as most basic compounds have been washed away by leaching. The average pH for the Amazon Basin is between 4.17 - 4.94 (Negreiros, G. H. de; Nepstad, D. C. 1994, Mapping deeply rooting forests of Brazilian Amazonia with GIS, Proceedings of ISPRS Commission VII Symposium - Resource and Environmental Monitoring, Rio de Janeiro.

  1. "The impact of visitors is damaging the environment of Epping Forest." - investigate.

    We can try and make the results as fair as possible, by going to Epping Forest once a week or once a month, our overall average results differ from our own results because using a quadrat makes it slightly different.

  2. Sustainable tourism, myth or reality?

    Finally, sustainable tourism is something that cannot be achieved in a decade or two. But it can change the way we think, we use resources, our attitudes to tourism and the development of the tourist industry which will be help to sustain and protect our world for future generations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work