• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does Churchill's description of the operation (source B) support the evidence of the sources C and E?

Extracts from this document...


2. Does Churchill's description of the operation (source B) support the evidence of the sources C and E? Source B is supported by source C because they both show land/sea and air this in source C with the 3 children in each uniform of the armed forces, this show that the operation was on a huge scale and would be difficult to organises this is also backed up by the amount of books shown in source C and the expression on Churchill's face. "The most complicated and difficult" this is also shown in source C through the placement of Churchill that he is in a library and that he is thinking also that the operation has been complicated and took lots of planning by all the maps and books on his desk this mission was going to be the biggest and most tactical operation of its time, there are however differences between the sources B and C these are that B doesn't show how hard Churchill has thought about the operation however it does show his confidence which source C does not. Also source C shows how young a lot of the soldiers were and how eager they are to go to war. Source B mentions that there is likely to be a lot of casualties whereas C doesn't this is because C is a poster designed to boast moral and B is a speak made to the houses of parliament so it is ...read more.


from this I can tell that the success of the Allied invasion was partly or maybe fully down to a German failure and their weaknesses. However source G also states that the Allied forces almost everywhere didn't achieve their specific objectives and in the case of the American Omaha beach they were close to defeat against the poor quality of defences. Omaha beach had no tanks support 27 out of 32 of which sunk and suffered 2,000 casualties however weakly defended the beaches were they were still underestimated at the Omaha beach. However the Germans were not as heavily guarded elsewhere therefore they underestimated how many troops and to the scale that the allied forces would be coming. My knowledge on the beaches is that the Sword and Juno beaches had a higher death rate than was anticipated, that the Utah beach was a success and only suffered 200 casualties, at Gold beach there was a success and the Allied forces were able to set up the harbour that is pictured in source D here. Source I states that "things did not go altogether according to plan", from this I can tell that what success there was on D-Day was limited and there were many mistakes made. The source also comment on that Montgomery claimed that D-Day did go to plan, from this I can tell that at the time the truth of what was really happening wasn't revealed and on many occasions there were false statements made to keep morale high this is an explain of propaganda. ...read more.


British intelligence that German's believed were on their side but were feeding them false information showing false photos of the Allied forces preparing on the beaches of Dover this was to make the German defences believe that the attack was coming to Calais if this had failed and they had found out where the attack was really going to happen then the success of D-Day may not have been a success it may have been a complete failure because in the case of Omaha beach they couldn't get through light defences in comparison to what would of awaited them at the coast of Calais. Source C shows Churchill's furrow planning and attempt to predict every eventuality and how much pressure he was under to makes sure that the operation was a success, Source B shows how Churchill knew that the operation could go either a way and he stated it "cannot be fully foreseen" Source I is a historians account of the D-Day beach landings, he states that the things didn't complete according to plan he states that the Americans landed successfully on one beach but at the other they disembarked to far out, and that the British dallied for a long time at their beaches this shows that however good the planning is, it can not take into account what happens on the day this is down to luck and the soldiers on the beaches. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sam Willgoss 11:12 D-Day Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Coastal Landforms section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Coastal Landforms essays

  1. "An investigation into the methods of coastal management along Brighton's Coastline and the reasons ...

    therefore my discoveries say that most people who come to Brighton will return. These results are just as conclusive as the previous because of the sheer greatness of the majority; even so, I consider that there are still not adequate completed questionnaires to make a sufficient enough conclusion.

  2. GCSE Georgraphy Coursework: Coastlines

    Advantages: Very effective. Relatively cheap. Maintains natural appearance of coast. Preserves a beach for leisure purposes. Disadvantages: Beaches probably need to be re-nourished if storms cause erosion, increasing the cost. Offshore dredging may increase erosion in another location. Used: In Cley-Next-The-Sea Analysis Groyne Measurements Sheringham Sediment build up is generally greatest on the eastern side.

  1. Sea defences around the beaches of Cley and Cromer

    What are the different management strategies at the two beaches and what are the reasons for them? Beach Profile We did the beach profile on both beaches - Cley and Cromer. To do this experiment we used two ranging poles, a tape measure and a clinometer, this was done so that we can measure the steepness of the beach.

  2. ‘The costs of extending sea defences at Walton-on-the-Naze are too high and the benefits ...

    I felt this because in site B there is the beach, and this is probably the biggest money earner, as without the beach all of the other things would not be there (see Negative Multiplier Effect diagram). Also site B has the beach huts that are quite costly to buy so this would bring in money.

  1. I am going to study Camber Sands and Fairlight to see if the hypothesis ...

    60 40 0 0 46 50 50 0 0 48 0 100 0 0 Slope Profile Data: Set 3: Distance Up The Beach (m) Up or Down (U/D) Angle (Degrees) Distance Up The Beach (m) Up or Down (U/D) Angle (Degrees) Distance Up The Beach (m) Up or Down (U/D)

  2. How and Why are Sea Defences being used in North Norfolk?

    I chose this question because it explains the different types of defences on North Norfolk and why they are being used on those specific beaches. 3. Do coastal defences alter the characteristics of the beaches of North Norfolk? To answer this question I will describe the characteristics of the beach and whether the defences are attractive or unsightly.

  1. How and why do the beaches vary at Barmston, Mappleton and Hornsea?

    May not be relevant now. 01/03/98 (needs to be horizontally rotated) Bi-polar vision of Barmston, Mappleton and Hornsea [fig 1] Barmston Fig 1.1 Low Quality 1 2 3 4 5 High Quality Very narrow \ Very wide Width of beach access Very poor \ Excellent Condition of beach access Very

  2. Invasion of Normandy

    Naval maneuvers were performed off the area's coast by the allies, and radio trafficking was manipulated so that German intelligence would suspect a major military force was organizing. Before the invasion, more bombs were dropped on Pas de Calais than anywhere else off the coast of By the time the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work