• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does Churchill's description of the operation (source B) support the evidence of the sources C and E?

Extracts from this document...


2. Does Churchill's description of the operation (source B) support the evidence of the sources C and E? Source B is supported by source C because they both show land/sea and air this in source C with the 3 children in each uniform of the armed forces, this show that the operation was on a huge scale and would be difficult to organises this is also backed up by the amount of books shown in source C and the expression on Churchill's face. "The most complicated and difficult" this is also shown in source C through the placement of Churchill that he is in a library and that he is thinking also that the operation has been complicated and took lots of planning by all the maps and books on his desk this mission was going to be the biggest and most tactical operation of its time, there are however differences between the sources B and C these are that B doesn't show how hard Churchill has thought about the operation however it does show his confidence which source C does not. Also source C shows how young a lot of the soldiers were and how eager they are to go to war. Source B mentions that there is likely to be a lot of casualties whereas C doesn't this is because C is a poster designed to boast moral and B is a speak made to the houses of parliament so it is ...read more.


from this I can tell that the success of the Allied invasion was partly or maybe fully down to a German failure and their weaknesses. However source G also states that the Allied forces almost everywhere didn't achieve their specific objectives and in the case of the American Omaha beach they were close to defeat against the poor quality of defences. Omaha beach had no tanks support 27 out of 32 of which sunk and suffered 2,000 casualties however weakly defended the beaches were they were still underestimated at the Omaha beach. However the Germans were not as heavily guarded elsewhere therefore they underestimated how many troops and to the scale that the allied forces would be coming. My knowledge on the beaches is that the Sword and Juno beaches had a higher death rate than was anticipated, that the Utah beach was a success and only suffered 200 casualties, at Gold beach there was a success and the Allied forces were able to set up the harbour that is pictured in source D here. Source I states that "things did not go altogether according to plan", from this I can tell that what success there was on D-Day was limited and there were many mistakes made. The source also comment on that Montgomery claimed that D-Day did go to plan, from this I can tell that at the time the truth of what was really happening wasn't revealed and on many occasions there were false statements made to keep morale high this is an explain of propaganda. ...read more.


British intelligence that German's believed were on their side but were feeding them false information showing false photos of the Allied forces preparing on the beaches of Dover this was to make the German defences believe that the attack was coming to Calais if this had failed and they had found out where the attack was really going to happen then the success of D-Day may not have been a success it may have been a complete failure because in the case of Omaha beach they couldn't get through light defences in comparison to what would of awaited them at the coast of Calais. Source C shows Churchill's furrow planning and attempt to predict every eventuality and how much pressure he was under to makes sure that the operation was a success, Source B shows how Churchill knew that the operation could go either a way and he stated it "cannot be fully foreseen" Source I is a historians account of the D-Day beach landings, he states that the things didn't complete according to plan he states that the Americans landed successfully on one beach but at the other they disembarked to far out, and that the British dallied for a long time at their beaches this shows that however good the planning is, it can not take into account what happens on the day this is down to luck and the soldiers on the beaches. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sam Willgoss 11:12 D-Day Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Coastal Landforms section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Coastal Landforms essays

  1. "An investigation into the methods of coastal management along Brighton's Coastline and the reasons ...

    therefore my discoveries say that most people who come to Brighton will return. These results are just as conclusive as the previous because of the sheer greatness of the majority; even so, I consider that there are still not adequate completed questionnaires to make a sufficient enough conclusion.

  2. The Holderness Coast

    'On field boundary opposite Rectory Lane, Tunstall'. There is probably a valid reason why 11.2metres of erosion has taken place. Slightly further up the coast, erosion has stopped, indicating sea defences. This means the process of longshore drift has stopped and the waves have a lot more energy to break down the cliff and erode it.

  1. ‘The costs of extending sea defences at Walton-on-the-Naze are too high and the benefits ...

    been trying to explore the hypothesis, 'the costs of extending sea defences at Walton on the Naze are too high and the benefits to small'. I do not agree with the hypothesis, I feel that Walton-on-the-Naze is worth saving. I think that sites A, B and C should definitely be

  2. Sea defences around the beaches of Cley and Cromer

    Rip-rap was also a feature of Cromer. Groynes: Groynes are made out tropical greenhart wood, which is used to moisture. It has a life span of 20-40 years. The setback of groynes is that it cost �1,000 per metre. Also Terminal Groyne Syndrome is a problem.

  1. How and why do the beaches vary at Barmston, Mappleton and Hornsea?

    appeal A little \ Much Seating Very poor \ Excellent Condition of buildings None \ Much Toilet provision None \ Much Food outlet provision None \ Much Bin provision None \ Much Other amenity provision Very poor \ Excellent Cleanliness of beach Much \ None Pollution other than litter Much

  2. A Comparison Of Film Techniques Used To Depict The Omaha Landing "Saving Private Ryan" ...

    They all start to vomit in a row as the camera moves from the front to the back of the boat. We then see Tom Hanks again in a full body angle. He starts to open his flask and takes a big swig of his drink not bothering whether he

  1. GCSE Georgraphy Coursework: Coastlines

    Again in 1993 in order to enforce these issues, all the sea defences were reinforced and the sea wall was extended costing �5.2 million. There is a natural sandbank which splits the longshore drift in two directions- east and west.

  2. My pilot study and extended investigation is to be conducted at Hunt's Bay, Gower.

    After analysing my zonation pattern for Hunt's Bay (see appendix 4), I am able to describe and explain the distribution of various organisms along the beach. I am also able to draw a profile of Hunt's Bay (see appendix 5).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work