• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Earthquakes: Why do some places suffer more than others?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Earthquakes: Why do some places suffer more than others? Whilst earthquakes are perhaps the most frequently occurring natural hazard, their impact on people, property and communities varies enormously from one place to another. It is possible to identify a number of factors that cause some places to suffer more than others. Whilst some are large scale and are to do with tectonic location, others are decided at a much more local scale, and relate to building design and levels of preparedness. Perhaps the most significant factor determining why some places suffer more than others is the tectonic location of an area. The distribution of earthquakes is commonly linked to the margins of global plates. Whilst the assertion that earthquakes only occur at plate margins is broadly true, it would be overly simplistic to assume that earthquakes are more common, and more devastating at some margins than at others. Yet it remains apparent that most earthquakes do coincide with the major plate margins, although a smaller number do occur away from plate boundaries. Generally speaking, earthquakes at destructive plate margins have a greater spread, and therefore affect more places than those at constructive plate margins, however this is a generalization, and earthquakes are subject to individual variation. ...read more.

Middle

People are often informed about potential dangers, and how to respond when earthquakes do occur. Furthermore, emergency services regularly practice their response procedures, so in the event of an earthquake the reaction is as smooth as possible. Typically, supplies of food, water, medicines and shelter are also stored in recognised safe areas ready for coping with the aftermath of an earthquake. Education and preparation are undoubtedly factors in reducing the scale of a disaster, particularly regarding the response after the event in terms of rescuing injured people and preventing the spread of disease. However, even the best laid plans can fail to live up to expectations. This was exemplified with the Kobe earthquake, when emergency teams reacted slowly, and appeared to be totally overwhelmed by the scale of the disaster. Poorer countries tend to be less aptly prepared. Whilst this is due in part to the lack of money to invest in materials and educational programmes, it is also because earthquakes are often perceived as infrequent problems in a society facing daily struggles for survival of a much more mundane nature. The geology of an area is further decisive in the ultimate significance a quake will have. ...read more.

Conclusion

In poorer parts of the world building design is often inadequate and, although building standards might be officially in place, regulations are rarely enforced. This was certainly the case in Mexico City, when in 1985 several modern high-rise buildings collapsed as concrete crumbled and thin steel cables tore apart. Conclusively, the impact of earthquakes on human activity varies significantly across the world. This is partly because the events themselves are unevenly distributed, both in terms of their geographical location and their magnitude, but also because people and societies have reached different levels of preparedness, in terms of building design and construction, and in their ability to educate people and respond after an earthquake event. Two earthquakes of a similar magnitude might be expected to have similar effects on human activity, but this is often not the case. Perhaps more than anything else, it is the ability of a country to respond to earthquake vulnerability that determines the likely impact, and there can be no doubt that the economic development factor is paramount in this respect. Whilst there can be no doubt that tremendously powerful earthquakes will cause destruction wherever they occur, it does seem to be the case that, all things being equal, LEDCs tend to suffer more than MEDCs. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hazardous Environments section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hazardous Environments essays

  1. Describe the global distribution of earthquakes.

    The fires following the earthquake also destroyed several thousand buildings. Discuss the degree to which the hazard can be predicted and managed. Effective management of geological hazards is still an exclusive object for countries throughout the world. Experience has shown that, even in the most technologically developed countries, much remains to be achieved.

  2. Why do LEDC's Suffer Greater Damage From Earthquakes Than MEDC's

    An example of an earthquake in an MEDC is the earthquake that occurred in Kobe, Japan, in January 1995. There were devastating effects of this earthquake. There were 5,100 deaths as a result of the earthquake and over 25,000 people were injured.

  1. A comparison of the Loma Prieta Earthquake and the Kobe Earthquake.

    Fires raged in some sections of the city and as water mains had broke; there was a lack of water. San Francisco's fireboat (the Phoenix) was used to pump salt water from San Francisco Bay through hoses dragged through streets by citizen volunteers.

  2. Effects of Earthquakes.

    8 to 9 on the Richter scale is roughly equivalent to a XI to XII on the Mercalli scale. Predicting Earthquakes Earthquake prediction has met with mixed results, however some success has been reported in recent years. Several countries, most notably the United States, China, Japan and Russia, are actively supporting research in this area.

  1. What are the variations in the effects and responses to volcanic activity between LEDCs ...

    Another estimated 40,000 young salmon were lost when forced to swim through turbine blades of hydroelectric generators as reservoir levels along the Lewis River were kept low to accommodate possible mudflows and flooding. National Guard pilots, with the help of Air Force reservists and the Coast Guard, flew to safety

  2. Explain why some physical environments attract more human activity than others

    All of these factors influence people to move into the area. Settlements build up but tend to be situated close to the agricultural areas. However much tectonic areas provide beneficial factors, there are always negative factors involved. With the volcanic activity, MEDCs can suffer greatly, and considering they don't benefit that much, the expenses are great.

  1. Can Human Innovation Greatly Minimise The Impact Of Earthquakes?

    This meant (especially in 1906) that the infrastructure was virtually bought to a halt! However, the difference in disaster between the two earthquakes is quite significant and a lot of this is down to human innovation. The earlier earthquake recorded more on the Richter scale and was at a different

  2. The focus of this paper will be the Queen Charlotte Islands earthquake of 1949.

    rush over low-lying coastal areas and cause severe damage (The Geological Survey of Canada, 2000). Not all underwater earthquakes cause tsunamis, however. Most earthquakes under the ocean are too small to trigger a tsunami. Even a very large earthquake, such as the Queen Charlotte Islands earthquake in 1949 did not generate a tsunami.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work