Economic, Social and Environmental Cost Associated With Earthquake Activity in LEDCs & MEDCs.

Authors Avatar

Economic, Social and Environmental Cost Associated With Earthquake Activity in LEDCs & MEDCs

Economic:

MEDCs: The damage to MEDCs done by earthquakes can be enormous, not only for the state but for the people living/working there, but the thing is, is that the state can afford it, although it may costs billions they can still do it. For example in Kobe the damage amounted to several billions, but it was all sorted and paid for. All the roads were retard, buildings rebuilt, people re-housed. They had the money and technology to find people hidden under rubble. Hospitals were able to cope because of the size of the countries economic status.

LEDCs: For LEDCs it’s a different matter all together, LEDCs are poor and not as technologically developed to cope with the effects. Not only are the people living there are poor, but the state is worse off than they are, being billions of pounds in debt. That means that if or when a earthquake strikes, they wont be able to rebuild and buy the materials, and wont have the services, or rather not enough to cope with the injured, lost, homeless, like for example in India, not only were they expecting an earthquake never to occur there, they also didn’t have the means or money to get a quick rescue team out.

Join now!

Social:

MEDCs: In an earthquake people may become homeless, but either they or the state will rebuild their old house or relocate, not many people are lost in an earthquake depending how built up it is (buildings collapsing and crushing, or gas and electrical fires may kill them) but generally if the earthquake hits somewhere not built up, like a village or a small town, then there will not be too much lose of life. The social effects of an earthquake can be a number of things like, the lose of a house, (or where they live) lose ...

This is a preview of the whole essay