• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the usefulness of the range of criteria available for measuring levels of development at a global scale?

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate the usefulness of the range of criteria available for measuring levels of development at a global scale? In the book development and underdevelopment by Garret Nagle, the term development is defined as: "The growth and modernisation of an economy, and an increase in per capita income and gross national product (GNP). While these are important aspects of development, increasing recognition must be given to improving the quality of life of the population, e.g. education, health care, cultural values and housing." Indicators that I am going to use to answer the question are GNP, life expectancy, illiteracy, safe water, infant mortality and population growth. I am also going to use some composite indexes and show how they are used; I will use a range of locations so that we can see how different countries vary. People often believe that development is to do with wealth and money of a country; this is because the most commonly used development indicator is wealth, gross national product (GNP) per capita - the total economic output of a country divided by its population. However this assumes that if a country is wealthy then the quality of life will be high, although high GNP per capita can disguise massive differences in the wealth of individuals and levels of human well being within the country. ...read more.


In figure 2 on the next page it shows us an example of a composite index and the variation between different indicators. From figure 1a on page 3 and figure 1b on page 4 you can see that Switzerland has the highest GNP with 36080, although it doesn't have the best results for life expectancy, illiteracy, infant mortality and population growth. Whereas Japan has got the better result for life expectancy, infant mortality and has a lower population increase but it is let down by safe water as 4% of population don't have access to clean water and has a lower GNP with 28190. However both of these countries compared to Kenya and Ethiopia are much more developed; Kenya GNP is only 310 compared to Switzerland's 36080. The life expectancy is fairly low at 59 years, there is a high level of illiteracy, just over half of the population do not have access to clean water, infant mortality is fairly high and it has a large annual population increase. Ethiopia is the overall least developed country it has the lowest GNP out of all the countries with 110, has the lowest life expectancy with average age of 49 years, only 18% of the whole population have access to clean water and also has the highest infant mortality rate with 122 per 1000 babies dying. ...read more.


which all have a lower HDI value. I have come to the conclusion that there is no index capable of showing the wealth and diversity of different countries, and all the indicators available are too general and ignore inequalities. I have also come to the conclusion that when measuring development the indicators used must be selected very carefully to obtain the results you want, for example: If you require to measure the well being of people within countries you are best to use the human development index, but if you want measure the economic development of a country you need to use indicators like average income and industrial output. Measuring development at the moment doesn't take into account the 'environmentally considerate development' and sustainable development, which is the change that allows improvements to be sustained. Development will continue to be a complex issue, because there will never be an index which will be able to show wealth and well-being, with out including the inequalities. There needs to be improvements in measuring and explaining indicators so that people are aware of the inequalities which are very important, as there are still many challenges facing both industrial and developing countries. With the support of the relevant and reliable measures of development the governments around the world will be able to develop programmes that address the needs of the deprived and ignored people of the world. Measuring development will help to identify the achievements of countries, and allow strategies for countries who are trying to move forward. 1 Ben King ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Global Interdependence & Economic Transition section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Global Interdependence & Economic Transition essays

  1. Development of the leisure and recreation industry

    Here I will show the top 10 of UK Restaurant chains in 1998: In 1999 there were 1169 restaurants in the UK that were part of the top 10 Restaurant chains. Between them they were providing a wide range of food and beverages.

  2. Can developing countries ever catch up with developed countries

    However, the benefits of such processes are mostly exclusive to the north. The main effect of globalisation for the remaining three-quarters of the world has been increased vulnerability to the demands of northern states and TNCs.

  1. Explain how HDI is determined.

    The report made clear the contrasts in economic prosperity and social well being between the North and South. According to the Brandt Report about 800 million people are barely surviving. A majority of these people live in Sub Saharan Africa e.g.

  2. With reference to specific examples evaluate the possible ways of reducing global differences in ...

    During the 1900s, many less economically developed countries took advantage of the economic stable environment that allowed small interest rates on loans. Seeing an easy solution to quick development, LEDCs blindly took many loans to fund their own economic and social environments, but the year of 1982 brought a sudden increase of world interest rates.

  1. Hand-Dug Wells in Ghana are an example of small scale, local,

    o In the water previously used by the villagers were risks of water diseases such as typhoid and cholera. Bacteria caused diarrhoea and tiny eggs that grew into worms inside you caused bilharzias and other infections. Now, with the hand-dug well villagers can access clean, safe water which does not carry disease.

  2. Evaluate the usefulness of GCP as a measure of living standards compared to other ...

    The black economy includes economic activity that goes unrecorded by the Inland Revenue and Customs & Excise. This includes output that is not sold at market prices but involves barter trade, and self-consumed products. The Economist's latest estimates for the total value of the black economy throughout the world is $9 trillion.

  1. 'The key to meaningful development in the Global South is debt reduction or debt ...

    we may be pouring water into sand.'2 The pressure of seventeen million signatures by groups such as Jubilee 2000 had finally persuaded creditors that debt reduction is the minimum step to be taken in order to restore development to the Global South.

  2. Examine the Indicators used to measure development and assess their usefulness

    reality, due to the measurement?s ignorance towards certain aspects of an economy. The GDP?s frequent use implies that it is the only measurement for economic growth, which is false. Other indicators of economic development include Purchasing Power Parity (PPP), which is basically GNP adjusted to local living costs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work