• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explaining Failure.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

By Zamokuhle Mngomezulu 09/11/2003 Economics Homework Explaining Failure Over the years 1965 and 1990, Sub - Saharan Africa when compared to South and South East Asian countries (the tiger economies of the period) has to a large extent grown less quickly. Overall, the actual difference in development among the regions selected is most vividly illustrated by the statistics of Sub - Saharan Africa. They have growth less quickly by negative four percentage points per year, over the time period of 25 years. Using Sub - Saharan Africa's initial conditions figure of 1.007 ( (0.7 / 100) + (100 / 100) ) as the base year, using -4.0 (the annual rate of growth), and taking into consideration 25 years, the actual difference in growth (based on the percentage point provide) ...read more.

Middle

Africa scoring the lowest at -0.3, compared to South Asian 0.0. Access to the sea is important for international trade apart from moving countries closer to the markets which they are trying to trade with, it has the immediate effect of reducing transportation costs. Temperature has also been a contributing factor, as according to data provided, tropical countries grew 1.3 percentage points slower than countries that are situated in temperate zones. East and South East Asian countries rather taking the route of tropical agriculture, they decide to focus on large expansion of manufactured exports. Their focus brought about by their determination to improve conditions for profits and labour intensive manufactured exports. This was a good economic policy as in doing so, East and South East Asian countries have avoiding the problems a linked with tropical agricultural. Allowing them to escape the poverty trap of the tropics. ...read more.

Conclusion

Considering the data provided, the demographic section of the data illustrates the increasing gap between South and South East Asian countries the greatest - The main contributing factor, being life expectancy (-1.3). This surpasses the percentage point obtained by South Asia by 2.6 times. It is apparent that this is the most imposing obstacle Sub - Saharan countries must overcome. In effect, breach of contract, expropriation of property, inefficiency in public administration, corruption and conflicts (wars and civil-wars), have stagnated relative positive growth. And have had the effect of moving it in the opposite direction. Void of social stability and political legitimacy (undermined by dictatorships), hopes of over coming problems of resources and geography, demography or implementing shrewd economics policy (that will increase growth at sustainable levels), cannot be realised until the issues of responsible and legitimate governance is addressed. As the article rightly sights, governments must play a fundamental part in economic growth through "prudent fiscal policy." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Production - Location & Change section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Production - Location & Change essays

  1. The Role and Importance of Agriculture In the Carribean. Organisations involved in its ...

    Soils display a wide range colour for example; * Reds * Browns * Yellows * Black * Green * White Organic matter cause soils to be darker in colour, which may also hide the effect of oxides. Organic matter is associated with good soil structure as well as soil fertility.

  2. Opportunities in the big emerging markets (BEMs) such as India, Brazil and China.

    Industry groups Foreign-Funded Enterprises Domestic Enterprises Labour-intensive industries 50.42 35.44 Capital-intensive industries 22.73 42.14 Technology intensive industries 26.85 22.42 Total 100 100 Source: As Table 2. Source: As Table 3. Table 4 Spearman's rank correlation test between the industrial structures of DOEs and FFEs Tests Calculated Spearman's rank correlation coefficient

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work