• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Geography River Analysis

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluation When I began this investigation, I set out to observe and achieve a greater understanding of how the River Thame's characteristics differ at different parts of the river downstream and also across the surface of it. I think that I have achieved that task, and now feel that I have a greater understanding of the way in which a river's characteristics differ at various points downstream. There were many limitations of the resources and methods in which we chose to collect our data. One of these, is the measuring of the velocity with an orange, this is most probably why there is no real trend to my results for velocity. I am putting the differences of the velocity to the fact that when we measured the velocity, some members of the group who were making these measurements, started recording the times before the orange was floating, so the time would be longer resulting in the velocity to decrease. Also in the final stages when we were recording our results, the orange was splitting due to the fact that some members were not handling the orange with enough care. ...read more.

Middle

My reason for this I think is because the orange we used may not have been floating when the clock was started. I think the data that is most reliable and useful is the width, bank height and water depth. I have chosen these as the most important because these are very simple to record, and usually it is very hard to make an error when measuring. These also give us a lot more information than the recording of pebbles and velocity, such as it shows the river's shape, and the way it changes downstream, the hydraulic radius, which can give us a hint to how the velocity changes downstream. The pebble size is useful in the way that it shows us how the river manages with friction and the affect it has on things like velocity. It would have been useful if there was the average rainfall in recent months and years to find the river's discharge and also it would be useful if we had information on how often the river floods usually. This information would have helped me explain the outliers in the pebble size because the load gets increased in floods as the banks get worn away and eroded. ...read more.

Conclusion

I could have improved my investigation in many ways for example to measure the velocity, it would have been sensible to take more oranges to measure velocity, and then we may not have had many differences due to the orange. Also in the timing, it would have been better if every time that we were measuring the velocity that we made sure that the stopwatch was not started until the orange was fully floating. Some things such as velocity can be measured by computer devices, so if I had the chance I would have got information from a computer that would measure the velocity of the river a number of times, over a long period of time. These can help us as unlike humans, computers don't get tired and they are very accurate in there results. I would have carried out the trial a lot more times if I had the chance again. The collection of pebbles could have been done a lot better in the way that people should not have picked the best looking pebble but looked away and picked a pebble at random. If I could, I would collect more many more pebbles and measured them and then the accuracy of my results would be increased. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology essays

  1. Study the downstream changes of Loughton Brook.

    Site 2 had a cross sectional area of 0.2m� which went on to 0.24m� in Site 3 and finally 0.35m� at Site 9. My hypothesis was proved correct by my results as the cross-sectional area increased as we went down the river.

  2. How does Loughton Brook change as it moves downstream?

    My results have been successful as they have provided me with the results that are geographically correct. They also support my prediction. I think that the sample size for both sediment and efficiency was appropriate but I think that while reading the velocity we could have repeated it 3 times and then worked out an average.

  1. Geography investigation - The River Skirfare located in the Littondale region in the Yorkshire ...

    68 650 68 700 65 750 53 800 53 850 61 900 59 950 51 1000 44 1050 41 1100 14 1150 0 These previous two tables show the most important information for this hypothesis. This data is that of the cross profile of both Arncliffe and Halton Gill riverbeds on the River Skirfare.

  2. Investigating the river Caerfanell

    m/s, site 2 with 0.378 m/s and site 3 with 0.457 m/s, so my hypothesis was proved correct. From graph you can see there is a general increase. As mentioned previously the reasons for this trend are due to many joining tributaries as you move downstream which increases the discharge

  1. 'To what extent does the River Lyn conform to the Bradshaw model of River ...

    timed to see how long it took for the propeller to move from one end to the other, and then an average was found. This was measured in seconds. Then to work out the proper velocity reading I used the calculation, 0.0277 + (3.2805 � average time in seconds).

  2. Geograpgy glendun river

    We set out a certain area of the river for each group; we were able to get into the river for more accurate data. We used both primary and secondary data. Primary data Secondary data Stream width Texts books Bank full width Class work book Stream depth Maps Mean depth

  1. Interpretation of why average velocity changes with distance downstream

    The big difference in the two is overland flow and interception. As the source has trees to intercept and slow down the speed in which water reaches the river and the peat to act like a sponge and hold the water this also cuts out and slows the water reaching the river via overland flow.

  2. Do the Characteristics of a river change downstream?

    The altitude at the source of Backstone Beck is approximately 315m above sea level. The level at which the beck meets the river is roughly 100m above sea level. The site at Backstone Beck where we will be collecting our data is roughly to the south of Ilkley and approximately 1 mile downstream from the source of Backstone Beck.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work