• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Do River Characteristics Vary Downstream?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Do River Characteristics Vary Downstream? Introduction On Wednesday 2nd October 2002 a river study was undertaken, investigating how the characteristics of a typical river vary downstream. The river to be studied was the River Lyd; this small river's source is at the junction of the A4136 and the B4234 near Upper Lybrook, Forest of Dean. The Lyd then meanders its way down a small valley towards Lydney, flowing parallel to the now disused Dean Forest Railway. The Lyd then flows into the man-made harbour of Lydney, situated on the Gloucestershire flood plains and then finally confluences with the River Severn, the course of the River Lyd is shown in Fig 1.1. Fig 1.1 The investigation took place on mild day subsequent to a long period of dry weather, this inevitably meaning the water table was fairly low and so decreasing the volume of water within the river, the Forest of Dean is an area of dense woodland. The aim of the study is to prove or disprove the three hypotheses: 1. Discharge will increase further downstream. 2. Cross-Sectional Area will increase further downstream. 3. The larger the wetted perimeter, the greater the discharge. Data Collection The aim of the study was to either prove or disprove the hypotheses concerning the varying characteristics downstream, this was achieved by collecting ...read more.

Middle

i.e. there is virtually no relationship between the two variables and a high probability that the coefficient has occurred by chance. In conclusion, hypothesis two cannot be accepted. i.e. cross sectional area does not increase further downstream. Geographical theories suggest that the hypothesis should be accepted, due to several reasons. Firstly, both the catchment area input (through processes such as surface runoff) and tributary input increases further downstream, the channel is eroded and made larger so to accommodate for the increased volume of water in the channel. The reasons for the results not corresponding with geographical theories, as well as problems and solutions encountered, for scatterplots showing site number against both discharge and cross sectional area, are in the following paragraph. Firstly, the stretch of the river Lyd that the study was carried out did not contain any confluences with tributaries. As mentioned above, the input from tributaries is a main contribution to an increase in discharge downstream, without any tributaries in the data collection zone, the volume of the river or the discharge will not increase. The lack of tributaries affect the cross sectional area as well, as the more water in the channel the larger the cross sectional area will be. ...read more.

Conclusion

Due to the fault in the flowmeter, the second method had to be used to measure the velocity; this method measures the velocity of the surface as the 'ping pong' ball floats in water. However, the flowmeter measures the velocity just below the surface and so the results are not consistent in the respect that the same part of the river was not measured at each site. This affects hypothesis one as discharge is calculated using the velocity of the river. Solution: This problem was unavoidable as it was the fault and the unreliability of the equipment. Problem: The title of the investigation is fairly general and extensive in respect to the areas in which the study has to cover, although only three hypotheses were chosen there several other hypothesis options available. Solution: Create another title such as: 'Investigate changes in river channel morphology' Problem: This investigation demonstrates the changes of river characteristics in only one way, this being hypothesis three - the larger the wetted perimeter, the greater the discharge. Solution: Investigate different hypotheses such as, 'the greater the hydraulic radius, the greater the discharge.' On this basis, it is difficult to suggest that this study has achieved the aim of its title i.e. 'How do river characteristics vary downstream?' However, this may be due to the inappropriate methods of data collection, explained in the first problem. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology essays

  1. Hydrology and Fluvial geomorphology. (Q&A)

    Water enters the drainage basin as precipitation from the atmosphere (input) and leaves it as discharge from the river channel into the sea or another drainage basin, or is lost back to the atmosphere by evaporation and transpiration (outputs). RIVER CHANNEL PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS Q: Explain, with diagrams, how and why the position of a meander changes over time?

  2. Study the downstream changes of Loughton Brook.

    * As stream order increases wetted perimeter will increase. The wetted perimeter would evidently increase due to the large influx of water resulting in a large overflow. * As stream order increases discharge will increase. Due to the growing amount of water the discharge would be greater as the water also increases in speed.

  1. Geography Coursework: Epping Forest

    The three sites were chosen because they were at the upper, middle and lower course of the river. This was ideal because the results from each site could then be compared easily so the hypotheses about how a river changes downstream could be tested.

  2. An investigation into changes in channel parameters down the river Horner

    water in the river the more mass it holds therefore the faster it moves. There is one other factor that I think may influence the velocity. That is the hydraulic radius, where the river is most efficient will be where the river is fastest.

  1. How does the Efficiency and Cross-Sectional Area of a River Change Down Stream?

    This is a weak, negative correlation. As there should be a strong positive correlation between the two, a problem must have occurred. This is most likely due to the method in which the data was collected, as mentioned earlier (see page 10/11).

  2. How does Loughton Brook change as it moves downstream?

    ANALYSIS OF RIVER EFFICIENCY To answer my key questions I have gathered the appropriate information to construct graphs and analyse them. In this section of my coursework I and constructing the graphs which then I closely analyse for any sequences or patterns or any anomalies.

  1. 'How does the risk of flooding vary along the course of the River Eea?'

    5 30 6 26 Average Velocity 14 The depths at the various intervals are all very similar because this part of the river as been almost completely man made. This is the channel profile for site 3: Factors of Flooding Score (on scale of 1 - 5.

  2. Geography investigation - The River Skirfare located in the Littondale region in the Yorkshire ...

    80 Sub-angular Average´┐Ż 116.625 53.75 These tables show the primary data that was taken from the locations Halton Gill and Arncliffe at the river Skirfare. It obvious to see that the larger material lies at Halton Gill, the location upstream on the river Skirfare.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work