• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful was Stalin's attempt to industrialise the Soviet Union?

Extracts from this document...


How successful was Stalin's attempt to industrialise the Soviet Union? There has been considerable debate over the extent to which Stalin was successful in industrialising the Soviet Union. Industrialisation chiefly involves exploiting natural resources to create products that would be helpful to the society and to do this, greatly mechanise the industries and improve productivity. One of the views suggested by historians is that it was an immense success for Stalin. The scale and speed of industrial development in the USSR between 1928 and 1941 was enormous. Western economists reckoned the average annual growth rate was 13-14%, with 3-fold increase in oil output, 4-fold in iron and steel and 5-fold in coal. By 1928, USSR was producing 25% steel as Germany but by 1940 it was producing New industries were developed - aircraft, aluminium, new industrial centres, e.g. Magnitogorsk, and new skilled workforce came into place. The other view, however, suggests that there was hardly any significant progress during the period and the Five Year Plans were chaotic and, as argued by Alex Nove, unrealistic and disastrous failures. One of most important arguments in supporting the claim that Stalin's attempt to industrialise the USSR was successful is that during the Depression of 1929 and years following the wall Street Crash, when the whole western world's economies were suffering, the USSR's economy was actually growing and performing relatively much better. ...read more.


One of the most important indicators of the success of an industrialisation programme is the extent to which the country has been urbanised. This means the movement of population from the countries to the towns and the growth of big cities in which there are a large number of factories employing many workers. Between 1928-40 there was rapid urbanisation in the USSR-there can be little doubt about that. Moscow's population increased from 2.2m in 1929 to 3.6m in 1936, Leningrad also experienced urbanisation with its population increasing from 1.6m in 1926 to 3.5m in 1939. New cities were created and certain previously undeveloped areas such as the Donbass coal and steel region saw a massive growth in their population. The public transport system was developed and in the larger cities, underground railway was being developed. The railways system was increased massively and by 1928 there was over 50,000 kms. of railway lines stretched across Russia. However, urbanisation had its drawbacks. Each Soviet citizen had, on average, 5.88 sq. metres of living space during this period, which was well below the 8.25 sq. metres sanitary norm. In Moscow demand for houses were far greater than what the councils could provide for-In 1932 there were 550 people living in a local army barrack 15 feet wide and 800 feet long. ...read more.


Resources were in shortage and the factories constantly demanded more than they needed. Bribery and corruption were rife and some firms produced more and some less. As a result industrial production suffered. In the Second and Third FYP, the plans were sorted out better and the details were discussed with experts and realistic targets were set for firms to meet. New training schemes were set up and a better idea of costs and revenue was made-as a result industrial performance was improved greatly during these years. However, on the whole there were certain drawbacks of the drive. There was always confusion around especially helped by the colossal paperwork which was floating around everywhere. It contained targets, which were never met, profits, which one could never see, and this distracted the authorities to further raise the targets. Fighting between firms was prevalent over natural resources. There was always someone to blame if the targets were not met. This greatly slowed the pace of the industrialisation drive of Stalin. The process of industrialisation did result in the increase of the size of the economy and greater production although the process could have been much faster. Thus it was an attempt, which was met with partial success. However, it certainly set the ball rolling for the USSR to develop in a major industrial power in the future. Aruni Mukherjee 6MVW 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Production - Location & Change section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Production - Location & Change essays

  1. Communist Russia under Stalin, 1928 - 1939.

    An efficient agricultural sector was also necessary so that fewer workers would be needed on the farms. Rapid industrialisation could only take place if more workers transferred from the rural countryside to work in the factories and industries. Rapid industrialisation would also achieve two political results.

  2. "Bottom up not top down!" Is this the way ahead for Aid and Investment ...

    It involved a major national advertising programme to attract Brazilians to this new frontier. A 1500km highway and access roads were built through the heart of the Amazon basin. Landowners bought massive areas of deforested land and converted them for commercial agriculture and TNCs built new factories.

  1. Everyone's Gasoline Problem. We are all familiar with fluctuating prices of gasoline at the ...

    In this case, I think one can ascertain that demand increased more rapidly than supply which led to the increase in price. The higher price would deter people to buy less milk and encourage people to buy substitutes. 3. Cotton- Analyzing the data from the U.S.

  2. Opportunities in the big emerging markets (BEMs) such as India, Brazil and China.

    South China (Hua-nan) includes Guangdong, Fujian, and Hainan Provinces (Figure 1). This regional economy was the first to attract foreign investment with its four original special economic zones (SEZs), and become the most outward-oriented. In recent years, it has embarked on transforming itself from labor-intensive operations to high tech manufacturing.

  1. "Can the theories that Alfred D. Chandler developed in his book 'Scale and Scope: ...

    Pauer E., 1985). While these extreme predictions have not become true and especially Japan is today in a severe crisis, the story of South-East Asian growth is unparalleled in the world except for maybe the development of the Western nations in the second industrial revolution.

  2. What natural resources does Antarctica have?

    not yet been developed but as supplies worldwide are depleted, it will become more cost effective. There are two opposing views about the feasibility of resource recovery in Antarctica.

  1. How successful was Stalin's Industrial Economic Programme during the 1930's?

    So it wasn't a complete failure. But there were still many targets which weren't met. The Great Depression caused the price of grain and raw materials to be driven down so the USSR therefore couldn't compete internationally as they could not earn enough from exports to pay for all the machinery it needed.

  2. Case Analysis: Longe Industries v. Archco, JNRP

    This applies when a defendant does not exercise reasonable care and competence in communicating the information. Although the damages available would be different in case of fraud vs negligent misrepresentation, Archco could still be charged with one of the two.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work