• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In a city in the UK, urban redevelopment and urban regeneration have been considered to solve the pr

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In a city in the UK, urban redevelopment and urban regeneration have been considered to solve the problem of urban decay in slums. Which do you think is a better idea? I am going to use the city of Glasgow as a case study to show the effects of urban redevelopment, and urban regeneration, and from his I will decide which is the better idea for stopping the urban decay in slums. Urban redevelopment is the knocking down and replacing and rebuilding in urban areas. It happened in Glasgow between 1957 and 1974. It involved the clearance of tenement housing in the inner city areas of the city. Houses were flattened to the ground with bulldozers and the existing communities were broken up and forced to split up and relocate to new housing estates on the edge of the city. ...read more.

Middle

open space, which was supposed to promote a sense of community and shared pride in their local environment However, the later part of the last century saw many of these high rise blocks destroyed and replaced by low-rise housing, as they had turned into 'slum estates' due to the design which promoted crime (e.g. joined walkways which allowed a burglar an easy getaway!) and other factors. The blocks were quickly built with poor quality materials and design and were poorly maintained. They were damp and isolated and there was no community any more. Many still lacked basic amenities - for example, between 1950 and 1970 more than 50% of the homes had no bath. The high rise blocks were often visually unattractive and were run down in appearance. They lacked individuality. The young mothers and elderly felt isolated, as the buildings were so tall. ...read more.

Conclusion

with modern amenities such as bathrooms, and were given character. This project improved housing and stopped the loss of population from the area. It also attracted 300 new factories, bringing new jobs into an area of high unemployment. This approach has achieved the most important aim of urban renewal, to bring back life to the old parts of our cities. Overall, I think that the regeneration scheme is a much more successful way to deal with urban decay in slums. The most powerful evidence of the failure of urban redevelopment occurred when some replacement housing, built in the 1960's in Hutchensontown, itself was demolished in 1987. This is a classic example of the failure of redevelopment. Regeneration was successful because it focused on renovating existing structurally sound buildings, instead of building weak unwanted high rise blocks. It also helped build 300 new factories providing much-needed jobs. The residents did not even like the buildings built in the redevelopment scheme. People were much happier with characterised flats in old, but strong buildings. Natasha Brice 10G ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Population & Settlement section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Population & Settlement essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful are the regeneration schemes in Liverpool?

    4 star(s)

    *Attracting inward investment from North America and the Far East The pictures below show the 'before and after' the Albert Dock regeneration. To revive the massive area of dereliction the total cost was about �60 million and took from 1981-87.

  2. London Docklands - Has the regeneration been a success or a failure?

    up very rapidly too, this meant that environmental quality and house quality was very bad and people did not want to live there any more. People started to go and live somewhere else in London and other areas. These declines were mainly caused by problems in the area and with the structure of the whole area.

  1. The London Docklands Redevelopment

    It also became a multi functional place, where it attracted new industry such as newspapers, and banks. New housing was built to replace the old terraced housing. The new housing is now bigger, and a lot more attractive to new families thinking of working and living in the area.

  2. Dharavi Regeneration Essay

    The town is built on high ground surrounded by marshland; Vashi has provided homes for 10,000 people. The homes have one room of 14 square metres, an inside toilet and a tap providing fresh running water. Within the first year of completion, 12,500 people have been attracted to the area.

  1. Math Portfolio: Radioactive Decay

    Result: 1 13-2=11 Year 15 7,6,4,5,5,4,8,2,3,5,7 Location Frequency of population 1 0 2 1 3 1 4 2 5 3 6 1 7 2 8 1 The graph would be: y= (1/2)^x Y=102.2436 When y=5, x will be 20.36568998 Where the line is the original formula and the dots are my prediction.

  2. An Urban Study Of Sheffield

    Terraced houses have no gardens and are square but many people in these areas have upgraded their homes by installing double-glazing and bay windows. The other type of environment was in Ecclesall these houses were mainly detached or semi-detached leaving room for gardens, drives and garages.

  1. Post-war UK redevelopment has turned to an era of urban uncertainty and disorder?

    The most significant period of return migration was again reached in 1975, with a peak of 1572 migrants returning. After that the level of returned migrants returned high ( at around 400-600 per year) until 1984, after which it declined to below 200 returnees.

  2. Locality and Hapiness: A Study of Quality of Life

    % change in population, 1991-1997 Barking and Dagenham 5 Havering -1 Tower Hamlets 7 1.5b UNEMPLOYMENT The inner London boroughs have higher levels unemployment than outer boroughs. Yet two thirds of people who work in the City of London - the heart of London's financial services sector - live outside London altogether.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work