• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Malthusian Theory

Extracts from this document...


Malthusian Theory Thomas Malthus, a British demographer, was renowned for his predictions based on world population and food supply. He believed that the worlds population would overrun the ability for them to support themselves. In short, the argument was that too many people and not enough food would cause a crisis. He thought that human population would be regulated by disease, famine, and war. His views were published in 1798. The basis of his theory is in two parts: 1) that population increases exponentially and 2) that food supply increases at an arithmetic rate. Malthus showed that with any increase in population, the population would exceed food supply. (fig.1) Malthus suggested two possible ways to limit further population growth: positive and negative checks. The positive checks were reducing the population through famine, disease, and war. ...read more.


Yet human population cannot grow beyond food production. This would cause many people to starve and so, would bring down the population to the carrying capacity of the environment. However, keeping within the carrying capacity, the quality of life would increase and by doing so, literacy rates and health standards would increase. Malthus was also wrong in many of his theories. He never accounted for the role of technology. New technology has changed the way we produce food and resources. Scientific improvements have greatly increased productivity and fertilizers help increase yields. (fig. 2) The graph shows the effect of technological ability to produce food and resources. Due to overlooking advances in technology, many of his predictions were wrong. Human population growth has not stopped, yet there is enough food for all (although not evenly distributed). With the natural increase, the expanding population is a resource, not a burden as he said. ...read more.


Although there are cures for diseases and vaccines, this means that less people are dying. People are living longer and dying less, causing population growth. Furthermore, the carrying capacity of an environment can already be surpassed through new technology and trade. The main thing to keep in mind is that, although some things can be shifted between areas (such as food), there must be a final limit we can reach with our resources. Theoretically, if people take what they need, there is more than enough to sustain the current population. There are many people who have more than their share of food or other resources that others could use. Malthusian theory are very much applicable to the world today. Even if not entirely correct, they are revolutionary and make us think more about where were are going and how we are going to end up. His theories have been reinvented and revised, proving that they are of use to us. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Population & Settlement section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Population & Settlement essays

  1. Geography: Causes of Famine

    Vegetation changes (drought-resistant species replace edible species) ? Soil quality reduced (grazing animals break down soil structure) ? Health of livestock and there productivity decreases. * Overcultivation - occurs when increasing food production is needed: ? to support increasing populations ?

  2. Why was Malthus wrong about Japan?

    If Malthus's theory is believed to have been operational in Japan then some sort of check was holding the population at its stagnated rate. Japan, unlike Europe at the time was a closed system. Emigration was unheard of and likewise nobody entered the country.

  1. Investigating the theory Tesco dominates shopping patterns in Purley

    It also benefits many customers, not only for the parking they provide but also for the number of bus stops that gives access to the shop. Unlike local shops that not only loose some customers because of the red route but also for bus stop access.

  2. How does Sen's approach to famine differ from the Malthusian approach?

    In simple terms, the population would get so great that we could not feed everyone, some people would therefore starve. Famine was a product of over population. Famine for Malthus was the natural way of keeping the population under control.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work