• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

My hypotheses are:The character of the course of the River Bollin will change along its course to the mouth. The bed load will decrease and angularity of the materials found in the river will be reduced. The velocity

Extracts from this document...


Chapter I, Introduction On Monday the twenty first of June, 2004, we went on a field trip to study the characteristics, and formation of a river, how it changes in its journey from source to mouth, including its load Our aim was to learn first hand about how a river changes and forms on the different types of land found in its course. I predicted that as the river went downstream, it would become consistently slower, cover a much larger wetted perimeter, and that the stones in its bed load would become increasingly rounded as it was ground into sand. This is my investigation into the changing characteristics of a river along its journey from the source to the mouth. This will include using my geographical knowledge to create hypotheses and test them out using the results gathered from our many tests upon the river. All the tests were kept the same to avoid spoiling of results. This diagram shows the accepted effects of a river on its course. With this diagram in mind, I based my three hypotheses on the things that this diagram state. My hypotheses are: 1. The character of the course of the River Bollin will change along its course to the mouth. 2. The bed load will decrease and angularity of the materials found in the river will be reduced. 3. The velocity and discharge will change along its course downstream. The sites Our study was of the River Bolin, at three different places along its course; the purpose being to gather information on how the characteristics of a river change as it travels from it's source to it's mouth. We arrived in school at normal time; we boarded a minibus, and then headed off to find the River Bolin. ...read more.


The weather was wet, with dark clouds and grey sky as well as light drizzle, also there was a small amount of flying insects found here, but not many as they are a characteristic of Stagnant, or slow moving water. Site 2, Langley Site two was further down hill, found at a place called "Langley". We arrived at Langley around 12:50am and headed off to the river, which was now larger water course due to input from many tributaries, there were many Confluences (the joining of one or more tributaries to form a single larger stream) along its course. Its course was less winding and it ran almost level with the brick buildings found on its left until it changed course and turned left downstream. To the right there was a large field. The river was on less of an incline and was slower moving, it also had a much larger width and a greater depth, the rocks found on its bed were less angular, more rounded and smaller than at the Macclesfield Forest. By this time the weather had improved, the sun was shining and the temperature was increasing. The air above the water at this site was teeming with biting insects Such as midges, which implies that there was stagnant water near by? Site 3, the Carrs The final site was a large river in a large area of flat land named "The Carrs". It was measured as the deepest of the three sites, and could submerge a person up to their waist, its bed was sandy, and its sides where cliffed. We had chosen this site as a great example of a Meander, a typical characteristic of the lower course of a river. ...read more.


As the efficiency of the river increased, the discharge increased, as less water was being blocked off along its course. This was aided by the fact that more water was being forced through the course as more tributaries added to it. Chapter VI, Evaluation Though the day was very much a success, there were many ways in which it could have been far improved. The very biggest limitation was that on the day, our teacher forgot to bring the flow meter. This made it difficult to get an accurate reading of the velocity of the water. Due to our lack of flow meter, we were forced to use a cork and a stop watch to measure how fast the water was travelling. The cork had a tendency to travel slower in the shallower, yet faster moving water of site 1, as it often got caught between stones in the bed. Later on, with deeper water the cork was not obstructed so travelled faster, regardless of the fact that the water was travelling slower than at site one. This gives the impression that the water is slower at the top of the mountain, were the incline is steeper. If we were to re do the experiment, I would use a flow meter. Another thing is that site 1 was chosen because of its accessibility, a not necessarily a perfect example of a river source. If the investigation was repeated, I would possibly travel further up hill to a faster flowing stream. Another thing, though difficult to remedy, was the fact that the metal chain used for measuring wetted perimeter was difficult to hold in place in deep water, I would have preferred to have weighed it down at the end. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology essays

  1. Hydrology and Fluvial geomorphology. (Q&A)

    At a velocity of 10 cm/second, sand would be transported but would not erode, whereas if the river had a velocity of 0.5 cm/second, the sand particles would be deposited. Q: What factors determine the efficiency of a river? Suggested Answer The efficiency of a river is determined by: velocity, friction, the wetted perimeter and the channel shape.

  2. How a river changes from source to mouth

    The river channel is now deeper and wider than before and the relief of the land round it is flat. But due to energy levels being low deposition takes place. The flood plain is now larger as the land is flat around the river.

  1. 'To what extent does the River Lyn conform to the Bradshaw model of River ...

    Hydraulic radius is the measure of the efficiency of a River channel. It is worked out by the calculation cross sectional area � wetted perimeter. Discharge. I will work out the average velocity and multiply it by the cross-sectional area.

  2. How does the Efficiency and Cross-Sectional Area of a River Change Down Stream?

    bottom, some vegetation, sand and gravel bed 4 White water moving over large boulders in most of stream Irregular bottom, weeds and coarse gravel on bed 5 Very severe white water and rapids Very irregular bottom, many boulders and extensive weeds Fig.

  1. Investigating the river Caerfanell

    - The tape I used was easily moved by the fast moving current of the river so the end measurement could be inaccurate. - The water itself was very cold and so the person's measurement taking may have lead to hurried and imprecise measurements.

  2. 'How does the risk of flooding vary along the course of the River Eea?'

    There were quite a lot of trees and vegetation so that would intercept the rain and the roots would absorb the moisture in the soil while keeping the soil together. The land was covered in vegetation, mainly ferns, which would usually increase the lag time after periods of rain.

  1. There are three sections in a river they are called: The upper Course, ...

    It actually consists of two waterfalls, the American Falls in western New York and the Horseshoe Falls in Ontario. Bridal Veil Falls and the Cave of the Winds, shown here behind a curtain of water, are part of American Falls.

  2. An investigation into changes in channel parameters down the river Horner

    river parameters; I am going to present them each with graphs and analyse each one. I will then compare parameters and see how they are interlinked and hopefully come up with explanations for my results. The graph shows that as I predicted the wetted perimeter increases downstream.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work