• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Poor countries are more at risk from natural hazards than rich countries. How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Poor countries are more at risk from natural hazards than rich countries. How far do you agree with this statement? For this question to be answered the meaning of the word "risk" needs to be considered carefully. It may be referring to the risk of loss of lives or money. Perhaps it is referring to geographical location creating more or less of a risk. Natural hazards can cause direct risks and indirect risks. It can have a wide range of interpretations, so therefore each of them need to be carefully considered. It is important to understand why people live in these "risky" areas. Understanding of this is a key issue into understanding the difference between rich and poor countries. As natural hazards are fairly unpredictable, many people feel it is not going to occur during their lifetime and therefore they take the risk. Some of these people are happy to take the risk, and think of it as a kind of "Russian Roulette" and consider it to be almost destiny. In Economically Less Developed Countries (ELDC's) there is often a lack of alternatives due to rapidly increasing populations so they are forced to live on fault lines, or unstable slopes. ...read more.

Middle

China has now recognised that the forests are ten times more valuable for flood control and water supply than they are for timber, and thus logging was halted in the Yangtze River watershed. The loss of 85% of the forests in the upper Yangtze worsened the 1998 flood which affected 223 million people. Natural disasters have a significant detrimental impact on the developing and developed world alike. On an annual basis over the past decade, ELDC's spend $35 billion on damages from natural disasters. On a per capita GDP basis this is relatively twenty times the cost in the developed world. A long term implication of this is for example, less money available to spend on improving the infrastructure to make sure it is safe. Generally the poorest developing countries lack internal resources to be able to reconstruct areas after they have been hit by natural hazards such as floods and tropical storms. In the USA, half of the costs of natural hazards are absorbed by insurance. In ELDC's only 2% of all costs in reconstruction are absorbed by insurance. Hurricane Mitch in 1998, caused damage in Central America which was $8.5 billion higher than the combined GDP of Honduras and Nicaragua, the two nations hardest hit. ...read more.

Conclusion

More hurricanes and floods are predicted to result from a global climate change. Since flooding and hurricanes tend to happen in the same regions, the exposure to countries already at risk will increase. Flooding occurs on 1% of the earth's landmass. Unfortunately, many of the fastest growing urban areas in the world are by the coast. These are in ELDC's and are located here due to colonial original development in these regions. When the countries were colonised, coastal areas were developed the most so that the colonial countries could maximise the ability to export goods. These cities tend to be the primate cities of the country for example Lagos, Nigeria. As discussed earlier, there are proportionately more ELDC's along the tropics which is the area vulnerable to hurricanes. These coastal zone cities will be subject to an increased risk as a result of global climatic change. Both rich and poor countries suffer from natural hazards. I would agree that poorer countries are more vulnerable than rich countries as they do not have as much money to spend on protecting themselves. Also they tend to have much higher population densities so more people are going to be affected. However, richer countries are affected economically. Poorer countries are therefore are more at risk at loosing lives due to natural hazards than richer countries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hazardous Environments section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hazardous Environments essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The number of fatalities that result from volcanic and seismic natural hazards is related ...

    4 star(s)

    The town of Chaiten is located 10 km south-west of the volcano and was covered with ash. Approximately 4000 people who lived there were evacuated, with an additional 1000 people from a nearby town, by boat. Before this eruption Chaiten was classed as low risk as the only eruption prior to this was 9400 years ago.

  2. "The Impacts of Natural Hazards include Social, Economic and environmental effects" Discuss this statement ...

    the soil reducing its growing capability and leaving the area nothing but bare soil for a few years. The recent flooding of 2003 occurred at the same time the landslides occurred. Sumatra suffers annual flooding but 2003 was a particularly bad year.

  1. What is an environmental (natural) hazard?

    The reliance has been on the UN (United Nations) and Red Cross to step in with relief. Recently, the international community are beginning to realise that relief and development are not separate, that vulnerability to hazards has everything to do with poverty and development together.

  2. Natural disasters are happening more often, and having an ever more dramatic impact on ...

    This ultimately meant that people did not think that a natural disaster had occurred therefore having the opinion that natural hazards occur less frequently. This point ties in well with transport.

  1. "Poor countries are more at risk from natural hazards than rich countries" How far ...

    This increases the vulnerability of the population and therefore the risk of problematic impacts. This occurred in the Mozambique floods in February 2000. Whilst there is an annual flood, and some forecasters knew there was to be a larger than usual flood, no one had experience of an event of such magnitude.

  2. Levels of development affect the ability to manage natural hazards. Discuss this statement in ...

    An example of this is Hurricane Katrina. Hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans a developed city on the coast of the United States. As the city is developed, the hurricane was able to cause a big affect and people were not able to manage it too well although many did leave the city in search for a safer location.

  1. California and the Phillippines - Hazard Hotspots and Human Management of Risks

    Satellites offer the prospect of global coverage from space. Hazard zonation maps can be used to guide decisions regarding evacuation and other responses. Land-use planning is also important. Monitoring of active volcanoes provides early warning of likely eruptions. The most reliable forecasts depend on detailed monitoring of micro earthquake activity

  2. Volcanic and seismic events are major pieces of evidence towards proving that plate-tectonics theory ...

    The Glossopteris ï¬ora is characterized by the seed fern Glossopteris ( Figure 2.1) as well as by many other distinctive and easily identiï¬able plants. Pollen and spores of plants can be dispersed over great distances by wind, but Glossopteris-type plants produced seeds that are too large to have been carried by winds.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work