• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Poor countries are more at risk from natural hazards than rich countries. How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


Poor countries are more at risk from natural hazards than rich countries. How far do you agree with this statement? For this question to be answered the meaning of the word "risk" needs to be considered carefully. It may be referring to the risk of loss of lives or money. Perhaps it is referring to geographical location creating more or less of a risk. Natural hazards can cause direct risks and indirect risks. It can have a wide range of interpretations, so therefore each of them need to be carefully considered. It is important to understand why people live in these "risky" areas. Understanding of this is a key issue into understanding the difference between rich and poor countries. As natural hazards are fairly unpredictable, many people feel it is not going to occur during their lifetime and therefore they take the risk. Some of these people are happy to take the risk, and think of it as a kind of "Russian Roulette" and consider it to be almost destiny. In Economically Less Developed Countries (ELDC's) there is often a lack of alternatives due to rapidly increasing populations so they are forced to live on fault lines, or unstable slopes. ...read more.


China has now recognised that the forests are ten times more valuable for flood control and water supply than they are for timber, and thus logging was halted in the Yangtze River watershed. The loss of 85% of the forests in the upper Yangtze worsened the 1998 flood which affected 223 million people. Natural disasters have a significant detrimental impact on the developing and developed world alike. On an annual basis over the past decade, ELDC's spend $35 billion on damages from natural disasters. On a per capita GDP basis this is relatively twenty times the cost in the developed world. A long term implication of this is for example, less money available to spend on improving the infrastructure to make sure it is safe. Generally the poorest developing countries lack internal resources to be able to reconstruct areas after they have been hit by natural hazards such as floods and tropical storms. In the USA, half of the costs of natural hazards are absorbed by insurance. In ELDC's only 2% of all costs in reconstruction are absorbed by insurance. Hurricane Mitch in 1998, caused damage in Central America which was $8.5 billion higher than the combined GDP of Honduras and Nicaragua, the two nations hardest hit. ...read more.


More hurricanes and floods are predicted to result from a global climate change. Since flooding and hurricanes tend to happen in the same regions, the exposure to countries already at risk will increase. Flooding occurs on 1% of the earth's landmass. Unfortunately, many of the fastest growing urban areas in the world are by the coast. These are in ELDC's and are located here due to colonial original development in these regions. When the countries were colonised, coastal areas were developed the most so that the colonial countries could maximise the ability to export goods. These cities tend to be the primate cities of the country for example Lagos, Nigeria. As discussed earlier, there are proportionately more ELDC's along the tropics which is the area vulnerable to hurricanes. These coastal zone cities will be subject to an increased risk as a result of global climatic change. Both rich and poor countries suffer from natural hazards. I would agree that poorer countries are more vulnerable than rich countries as they do not have as much money to spend on protecting themselves. Also they tend to have much higher population densities so more people are going to be affected. However, richer countries are affected economically. Poorer countries are therefore are more at risk at loosing lives due to natural hazards than richer countries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hazardous Environments section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hazardous Environments essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The number of fatalities that result from volcanic and seismic natural hazards is related ...

    4 star(s)

    Although it had a history of explosive eruptions, this extended period of dormancy, the remote location of Chaiten and its low population density, meant that it was of low priority. Chile has only one volcano observatory to its 20 volcanoes and there was no time monitoring of the reaction until the USGS arrived on 16th may 2008.

  2. The Global Distribution of Geophysical Hazards

    earthquakes per year) and yet do not seem to suffer from as many deaths as other high-risk areas. Fig.7 Death by volcanoes 1975 - 2000 Fig.7 shows the proportion of deaths worldwide by volcanoes. Volcanic eruptions occur less frequently than earthquakes and the relatively smaller amount of data makes it harder to analyse the distribution of their effects.

  1. "What are hazardous Environments and how can hazards be classified?"

    Examples, like settlements with impermeable surfaces can later lead to flash flooding. Cultivation and agricultural practises can also contribute to flash flooding and landslides. Natural hazards can be classified by the principal causal agent: Geophysical Climatic & Meteorological Geological & Snow+ Ice, Geomorphological Droughts, Avalanches, Floods, Earthquakes, Frosts, Erosion (inc.

  2. What is an environmental (natural) hazard?

    Trying to deal with it afterwards, after all the effects have happened and the area is devastated, many people are killed or injured, buildings and livelihoods have been lost, means that the costs are always going to be that much greater and it will take longer and longer to get back to normality, if at all.

  1. "Poor countries are more at risk from natural hazards than rich countries" How far ...

    This increases the vulnerability of the population and therefore the risk of problematic impacts. This occurred in the Mozambique floods in February 2000. Whilst there is an annual flood, and some forecasters knew there was to be a larger than usual flood, no one had experience of an event of such magnitude.

  2. Evaluating climate change

    Changes in solar activity do affect global temperatures, but research shows that, over the last 50 years, increased greenhouse gas concentrations have a much greater effect than changes in the Sun's energy. Climate models predict the main features of future climate.

  1. California and the Phillippines - Hazard Hotspots and Human Management of Risks

    The water level also rose during this period. In September 1965 the volcano erupted violently. It is impossible to prevent volcanoes from erupting. In addition, it is virtually impossible to monitor all active volcanoes. However, there are a number of measures that can be taken to limit the damage from volcanoes.

  2. Volcanic and seismic events are major pieces of evidence towards proving that plate-tectonics theory ...

    How could they possibly have migrated across the oceans? The land masses in which they lived must once have been connected. 1. Some of the most compelling evidence for continental drift comes from the fossil record. Fossils of the Glossopteris ï¬ora are found in equivalent Pennsylvanian- and Permian-aged coal deposits on all ï¬ve Gondwana continents.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work