• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Referring to contemporary debates about development in East London, discuss the problems of assessing the success and failure of redevelopment through the use of available statistics.

Extracts from this document...


Referring to contemporary debates about development in East London, discuss the problems of assessing the success and failure of redevelopment through the use of available statistics. The area of East London is a region that is in a period of immense transition. It has been for hundreds of years and surly will continue to be, as it is by nature a forever evolving location. Following great economic, industrial and (as a result) social decline in the late twentieth century, efforts have and continue to be made to regenerate the former prosperity of the area. Since the beginning of major programmes of redevelopment more than twenty years ago, there has been great debate about the success and failure of the schemes implemented. Throughout the early 1970s, the area was praised as being "one of the most exciting developments of the century" by Peter Walker, at the time the secretary of state for the environment. But despite millions of pounds of marketing and investment, it is argued in many contemporary debates that what has been offered for years has never been delivered. This essay will discuss these issues, old and new, studying the Docklands in particular as an area of east London that has seen massive change in the last part of the twentieth century. Giving attention to the aims of authorities to rejuvenate the region, it will evaluate the seemingly immortal argument that is "has the regeneration and redevelopment been a success or a failure?", focusing on the problems that occur with trying to answer such a question. ...read more.


The surrounding environment was also better improved as the old industrial areas were redeveloped, so many of the units could be built in close vicinity to, or even on, the waterfront. Away from housing and accommodation, more than 2.25 million square metres of non-residential floor space (that is new industrial zones, commercial and leisure buildings) have been created by the LDDC. Although some of this does include a few light industrial developments, it is principally recreation complexes, shops and other retail establishments. In addition, the creation of almost 67,000 new jobs in the docklands represents a massive achievement and one seemingly of considerable merit. At this rate, it has been forecast that the working population of the region is likely to be 175,000 by the year 2014. When the commercial and economic heart began to slow into non-existence just twenty years ago, the population could only foresee devastating levels of redundancy. Indeed, between 1965 and 1985, it is estimated that upward of 27,000 jobs were lost in the docklands region. This is an incredible turnaround from the future the region faced in the latter part of the twentieth century. In relative terms, it can be said that this information is excellent news and that it is good evidence to suggest that the redevelopment of the London Docklands has been a success. Unfortunately, it is only one side of the coin and there are many other factors that contribute to the contemporary "success or failure" debate. ...read more.


Having referred to several contemporary debates about development in east London, it is clear that there are problems in assessing the success and failure of redevelopment in the region. The disputes that impede this evaluation include one or two trying questions; if an authority is to spend a lot as much money, as the LDDC has, who should benefit? The local people should surely be top of the list? If an authority are supposed to provide for the 'local' people then they have to know who the local people are - how do you define 'local'? How long does one have to live in an area to be considered local?! Inter-urban differences further the argument as to who should benefit from such colossal spending. As the LDDC has a strict, defined border, areas that it can develop are frequently right next door to those that are much older and more run-down, making contrasts obvious. Having studied these arguments, it is without a doubt extremely difficult to come to a standard, straightforward conclusion as to the success or the failure of regeneration in east London. The debates that arise over the actual need and appropriateness of some of the changes in the region that the LDDC once surveyed are still very much open, despite evidence to suggest great achievement in some sectors. Indeed, there are concerns about the paths that were followed in the hope of regeneration. The LDDC has now been disposed of, but issues may still be raised as to its equity and democratic responsibility. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Population & Settlement section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Population & Settlement essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful are the regeneration schemes in Liverpool?

    4 star(s)

    back into the city, especially if there are hospitals and low cost housing for families. Also all the regeneration needs people to do jobs, so it also brings skills into the area making the whole thing a success. Conclusion and Evaluation My original aims were to find out how successful the regeneration projects were in Liverpool.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Rebranding in the london docklands: case study

    4 star(s)

    Success of rebranding The relative success of the rebranding process can easily be determined simply by looking at interviews and presentations and comparing peoples opinions of the area with the overall percentage of the area which has been regenerated. To illustrate this more clearly, see figure 3.1.

  1. The London Docklands Redevelopment

    quality was very bad and people did not want to live there any more. People started to go and live somewhere else in London and other areas. These declines were mainly caused by problems in the area and with the structure of the whole area.

  2. London Docklands Case Study.

    In 1998, the area had a record to 38,000. Of these some 17,700 were for owner occupation, 5,300 for housing associations and nearly 1,000 for local authorities. The proportion of home ownership has leapt from 5% to 45%. 7% of the budget was spent on community infrastructure and activities, which help the environmental quality, get better.

  1. land use pattern

    Lower-class housing: 25% Middle-class housing: 40% Higher-class housing: 5% Local authorities: 5% Industrial: 15% Commercial: 10% Conclusion Sloughs land use pattern is closest to the concentric circles model because it seems to suit Sloughs land use pattern better than any of the other models.

  2. London Docklands - Has the regeneration been a success or a failure?

    The Tower Hamlets Council has made a deal with the LDDC that the council tenants after being homeless due to the Limehouse Link that they should be re-housed. Another deal was that 2000 Canary Wharf jobs and �2.5 million towards training for local people.

  1. Microclimates.My purpose of this study is to establish whether my hypotheses are true or ...

    The first table displays the data obtained at West Ealing, an area of high building density, and the second table displays the data obtained at Osterley, an area of low building density. Time Wind Direction Temperature (OC) Temperature (OC) Relative Humidity % Wind Speed (mph)

  2. Evaluate the success of urban regeneration schemes in combating the causes of urban decline ...

    house prices increased making private housing unaffordable to people on low incomes leading to economic segregation 2. Unemployment is still high in comparison to the rest of manchester and it is still a very poor area with 47.5% of the pop living in social housing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work