• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Seaweed Study on a Rocky Shore

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Seaweed Study on a Rocky Shore Introduction Two-thirds of ocean activity occurs on or around the coastline. On every beach there is seaweed. I am going to investigate the dominant species of seaweed on West Runton beach, North Norfolk near Cromer. I will also investigate the diversity of each seaweed on the beach. I will take into account some abiotic influences as well e.g. P.H, salinity, sand and stone size Aim: To find out the predominant species in three squares set out at different distances from the sea. To find out the diversity of seaweed on the beach. Also measure the temperature, P.H, salinity and investigate the sand and stone sizes to see if they affect the seaweed distribution. Hypothesis: The distribution of the most dominant seaweed species is directly affected by the position on the beach (towards or away from the sea). This hypothesis is based on the idea that the seaweed that is most common in one area of the beach will not be the most common in other areas up the shore. Apparatus: The apparatus I have chosen is the most appropriate piece of equipment for the task, relating to scale and detail, as was available to me. �1x1m Quadrate, �ID sheet, �Random number sheet, �Electrical thermometer, �PH testing kit, tape measure �A note pad and pencil. �A calculator Diagram: Methodology: Simple Preliminary Test: The preliminary test was done to find the most commonly found seaweed in an area of shoreline. ...read more.

Middle

4 Station 5 Station 6 Bladder Wrack 92 31 84 53 69 73 Serated Wrack 6 14 7 16 0 22 These are the results of the third square that we did: Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 Bladder Wrack 0 0 0 0 29 100 Serated Wrack 0 3 0 0 27 0 Entermorpha 35 80 37 74 53 0 Sea Lettuce 0 0 0 29 0 0 Laver 0 0 0 3 0 0 The results of both the preliminary and the actual experiment are also in the form of graphs. Average Temperature: (in degrees Celsius) Square 1: Sand =14.8 Water =15.3 Air: 13.7 Square 2: Sand =15.0 Water =15.1 Air: 13.6 Square 3: Sand =15.3 Water =14.8 Air: 13.6 PH of Water: Square: 1: 8 Square: 2: 9 Square: 3: 8 Analysing the Results: The graphs show that Enteromorpha and Bladder Wrack are situated in their own specific niche. This is shown in the graphs by the direct correlation between species. This tells us that Enteromorpha and the Bladder Wrack are the dominant species on the beach. This is because they are best suited to the rock on the beach. Enteromorpha is the dominantly found on soft rocks e.g. chalk, whereas the Bladder Wrack is best suited to the hard rock e.g. flint. Sea lettuce, Laver and Serrated Wrack were found randomly placed within larger areas of dominant seaweed. ...read more.

Conclusion

The results show that the distribution of the most dominant seaweed is affected by its position on the beach. However in the hypothesis we thought that it would be a direct effect, this we discovered was not true. It was the effects that the position on the beach had on other factors that influenced the distribution of the seaweeds. Evaluation: I believe that our experiment was carried out as well as we could, considering that we had little time to plan the experiment and we did not know the lay out of the beach. The apparatus was the best we could use so we had to make the best of what we had. Some of the apparatus also was not available all the time, like the thermometer, which was out of use because of other people wanting to use it. The results we had we the best we could get due to the nature of out experiment. The quadrate was easy to use but it did not give truly accurate readings, because some squares were not fully covered. Also in some of the squares there were rocks pools, which could lead our experiment astray. In the experiment we found two anomalies, Laver and Sea lettuce. I think that if we had created a larger survey we may have been able to find out were these varieties mainly occurred. If I were to do the experiment again I would spend more time on the experiment and repeat it three of four times. This will give me a better chance of proving my hypothesis. Daniel Francis 11RW 10/09/01 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Coastal Landforms section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Coastal Landforms essays

  1. "An investigation into the methods of coastal management along Brighton's Coastline and the reasons ...

    To make a conclusive account I will have to produce more questionnaires so that I can get more results and can compare the similarities and differences in more depth. There is a possibility that the above discoveries are incorrect as many poles show that 20% of the population of Brighton

  2. Investigate the difference in density of limpets on a sheltered rocky shore and on ...

    that that limpet can form a vacuum, enabling it to cling to the rocks. Leaving this place leaves the limpet susceptible to wave action a process described later and it is easier for predation by Crabs, Blennies and Dogwhelks. For these reasons, the limpets must therefore feed at night.

  1. The Study of a Psammosere Succession.

    After weighing them, I would gently heat them until all the moisture had evaporated. I then weighed it again and took the second weight away from the first to give me the amount of moisture in the soil. After this I heated the samples again with greater heat to burn

  2. "Comparing the mean ratios of shell height/diameter of the Patella spp on an exposed ...

    although tolerance to desiccation in lower shore organisms is poorer. This is because lower shore organisms tend to be smaller limpets and are more vulnerable because of their high surface area to volume ratio. Shell morphology is also important. Higher shore individuals have taller shells which reduces the circumference to

  1. Humans have not affected the sand dune ecosystem on the North Norfolk Coast.

    Soil, sand and plants etc. I am predicting there will be some kind of sea defence; this will probably include the use of gabion boxes. Gabions are rectangular steel wire mesh baskets to be filled with stones. Each gabion is usually divided into cells by wire mesh panels called diaphgram to stregthen them.

  2. In my studies I will try and determine how and why management strategies have ...

    Focussing the question I was typing into the search engine to get a more concise range of answers which, I would receive to use. 07/11/2002 onwards Use information within text, also using various pictures and maps downloaded from the internet to integrate into my coursework.

  1. Beach survey

    * When using the trowel some people may not know when they are meeting the clay. * The measuring tape could get twisted and the measurements could be affected. Bipolar Analysis In my hypothesis booklet I filled in the bipolar analysis grids of sea defences.

  2. "Describe and explain the differences in the coastline North and South of the Tower ...

    The waves on both beaches are destructive which means they have a large height and strong backwash which removes the beach material, the South more than the North. Evaluation If I was to do this investigation again there are ways in which I could improve it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work