• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The 1993 Mississippi floods were caused by hard river engineering" Discuss this statement.

Extracts from this document...


"The 1993 Mississippi floods were caused by hard river engineering." Discuss this statement In 1993 the Mississippi River, whose mouth is located near New Orleans in South of the USA, flooded causing $15 mil worth of damage. Around 50 people were killed in the disaster as 18 thousand square metres of the States were covered in overland flow in North America's worst flood. In normal conditions, every spring the river fills up draining half of the country's water, and floods are common so to aid this, American governments set up various 'hard engineering' schemes to control the water. Examples of this type of engineering feature the construction of artificial levees to prevent the river from overflowing, and the building of over 200 reservoirs in an attempt to hold back large amounts of water. The instalment of wing dykes to improve transport through river dispersion was also used, and the interference of hard engineering has been seen as one of the leading causes for the worsening of the 1993 floods . It can be argued that a lot of the hard engineering work done on the Mississippi river actually made the consequences of the flood a lot more severe than if the river had been left to take its natural course. ...read more.


is created, therefore quickening the river's discharge rate by removing the hindrance caused by 'unnecessary' meanders. In the case of the Mississippi floods, the diversionary spillway went from Baton Rouge, where a lock was put in place to create a new artificial channel all the way down to the coastline. As the water now flows in a relatively straight line, there is reduced friction along the sides and bed of the channel, increasing the velocity and making the river more efficient. The theory behind this protecting from floods is that there is less of a risk of flooding at the lock due to the faster flowing water. However as soon as the water reaches the natural channel that is uneven by nature, velocity is reduced and efficiency reduces. This means that water collects, presenting an even greater risk of flooding than before, as its banks can be easily broken. Another school of thought implies that some forms of hard engineering actually do contribute to effective reduction of the effects of flooding, or at least they do not worsen them. Revetments for example, are usually wooden or metal bulky material that is set up in meanders in the river in order to prevent meander migration, so that it does not expand further outwards onto land that is frequently urbanised or containing such a structure as a bridge. ...read more.


In conclusion it can be said that yes, some forms of hard engineering have exacerbated floods due to poor planning for river response. Diversionary spillways create a very fast flow of water that is unnatural and therefore disrupts the river when the water rejoins the natural channel. Similarly, artificial levees mean that minor natural floods are not permitted in order for sediment to pile up around the banks, so it builds up at the bed of the river, reducing space in the channel, and therefore encouraging spill over. On the other hand, it can be said that floods are not always the result of hard engineering due to the presence of evidence to suggest that some forms of hard engineering have little effect, and sometimes even a positive one on the floods in comparison. Other contributing factors have been said to have exacerbated the floods as much as some forms of hard engineering, such as the presence of urbanisation in the river's floodplain, and the lack of any accurate or existing records of other serious floods allowing less scope for predictions and therefore decent planning. Therefore it should be said that hard engineering in some cases has been known to create bigger flooding problems, however it is not solely to blame for the Mississippi 1993 floods, as the presence of other human intervention can be seen to have also exacerbated the effects of flooding. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology essays

  1. 'How does the risk of flooding vary along the course of the River Eea?'

    A marker has been placed in the river so that the resident can tell when the river is about to burst its banks. Each of the three houses along one side of the river has used a different form of flood prevention to try to protect their homes.

  2. Geography investigation - The River Skirfare located in the Littondale region in the Yorkshire ...

    Scale; 1cm: 125cm Total Riverbank and bed length= 58cm x 125cm =7250cm. Like the Halton Gill calculations this does not take into account the part of the banks that were not covered by the river. The river at this location was 84cm below bankfull on the day of this investigation.

  1. Investigating the river Caerfanell

    This widens and deepens the river as there is less friction around the wetted perimeter, and as a result it increases velocity downstream. The only anomalies of the graph are found at site 1 interval 3, and site 2, interval 4 of where the velocity readings are higher than expected.

  2. 'To what extent does the River Lyn conform to the Bradshaw model of River ...

    28 I will now find the similarities and differences between my results and the Bradshaw model of River characteristics: Fig. 29 Factor Bradshaw model results My results Discharge Increase Increase Occupied channel width Increase Increase Water depth Increase Increase Water velocity Increase Increase Load quantity Increase *Unable to measure* Load

  1. Geograpgy glendun river

    water flowing in a river, measured in cubic meters per second (cumecs) Distributaries - finger-like river channels which branch away from a main river channel in a delta. Erosion - the wearing away of rock or material Estuary- The wide end of a river when it meets the sea; salty

  2. Study the river Cray and see whether the river actually follows a natural path ...

    A drainage divide divides or separated different basins. A catchment is the area drained by a stream, lake or other body of water. Legend: Divide: the boundary between one drainage basin (catchment) and the adjacent basin. Main stream: the stream into which all the surface water in the catchment eventually flows.

  1. River Management Case Study on The Mississippi.

    These maintain the water in the river, however, the worst flood in recorded history occurred as the Mississippi breached the levees in 1993. This caused widespread damage from May until September. This meant the further construction of more levees and in some area raising the height of the levees to prevent the occurrence of this again.

  2. Compare the observations and recordings made at the two sites with predictions made from ...

    Discharge: I predict that the discharge of the river will be greater at Site 2 than at Site 1. Discharge is the volume of water that flows through a section of the river at a given time. It is calculated by multiplying the average velocity (ms-1)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work