• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19

The characteristics of the Horsbere Brook vary along it length.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The characteristics of the Horsbere Brook vary along it length. Introduction We followed the Horsbere Brook from its source in Buckholt Woods) to its confluence with the River Severn. We went to six places. They are Birdlip, Brockworth, Buckholt Woods, Innsworth, Hucclecote and Sandhurst. All these places are in the Cotswold Hills. The Cotswold Hills is made up of limestone, clay, chalk, sand and clays. As I work through my coursework, I will try and answer the following questions below and I will also think about them as I go along my coursework. 1) Does the depth of the River change from source to confluence? 2) Does the width of the River change from source to confluence? 3) Does the velocity of the River change from source to confluence? 4) Does the bedload of the River become smaller in size from the source to confluence? Picture of Meander: (Meander spotted at site ) Meander - When rivers flow over a flatter land, they develop large bends called meanders. As a river goes around a bend most of the water is pushed towards the outside causing increased erosion. Attrition - Material is moved along the bed of a river, it collides with other materials and breaks up into smaller pieces. Corrasion - Fine material rubs against the river bank. The bank is worn away by a sand-papering action called abrasion and collapses. Hydraulic action - The sheer force of the water hitting the banks of a river. Traction - Large rocks and boulders are rolled along the bed of the river. ...read more.

Middle

On the right side of the stream, the pebbles length was around 7cm. The width of the pebbles was around the same on the left and middle side of the stream of 5cm. On the right side of the stream the width was around 6cm. Most of the pebbles were angular but on the left side the pebbles were more sub-rounded. The fourth site we visited was Hucclecote. The environmental quality index had a high mark and the litter and human impact which tell us that there were no traces of litter to be seen. The variety of vegetation was good but not brilliant but there was a lot of it. Hucclecote received the total mark of 27/35. I took a cross section recording at Hucclecote and I found the depth of the river which was 67cm and the width was 400cm. The above recording of the depth was from the middle of the river at 170cm. I also did a bedload grab sample and found that most of the stones by the river were sub-rounded and the width of the stones were around 3.5cm and the length was around 5cm. I took the velocity at Hucclecote and the results indicate to me that the river was flowing quite fast. Overall it took about 30 seconds for the dog biscuit to travel 10 metres. This was the fastest recording from the four sites where velocity was taken place. The land use at Hucclecote was mainly fields and woods. There were also quite a lot of buildings spotted with roads cutting through the streets. ...read more.

Conclusion

2) Does the width of the river change from source to confluence? - Yes, the width of the river does change as again, we were not able to measure the width of the river at the sixth site as it was too wide. 3) Does the velocity of the river change from source to confluence? - No, the velocity does not change from source to confluence as it was around 40 at site two and also around 4o at site five. This shows that the velocity hardly changed at site two, three, four and five. 4) Does the bedload of the river become smaller in size from the source to confluence? - Yes, the bedload of the river became smaller in size from the source to confluence as at site two the length was around 8cm and the width 6cm and at site four the length was around 5cm and width 4cm. I have answered these questions from the information I gathered from my coursework. Evaluation I am now commenting on my coursework. The methods were primary and secondary data. I used simple methods to carry out my tasks for the coursework. We did not have complicated equipment just rulers and dog biscuits. On the whole I think the equipment which was used worked out well for my coursework. The results I have were fairly accurate. We could have improved the results by carrying out each task several times but due to the lack of time we had to carry out each task we could not do so and also by using more accurate equipment. I feel that the conclusions I have made are correct and the details in my coursework show this. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology essays

  1. Study the downstream changes of Loughton Brook.

    Corrasion will also occur and will widen the channel. I conclude this by saying that my hypothesis of the water width and channel width increasing was proven within the basis of my results. I also included water depth in one of my hypotheses by saying that it would increase as the stream order increases.

  2. Geography Coursework: Epping Forest

    Hypothesis 2: The depth of the river channel will increase with distance downstream. For this we used a 1 metre ruler to measure from the river bed to the top of the water three times at regular intervals across the channel.

  1. How does the Efficiency and Cross-Sectional Area of a River Change Down Stream?

    To answer this question I first needed to work out the efficiency and cross-sectional area separately by using the key questions on page 1. I worked out the cross-sectional area increased down stream, which can be seen on pages 7-9 in figures 5 and 6, ands graphs 2A-L showing graphs of the cross-sectional area of the river and graph 3.

  2. 'How does the risk of flooding vary along the course of the River Eea?'

    A lot has been done here to help prevent flooding, the river has been straightened to increase the speed of the water flowing through it and high walls have been built either side of the river to try to stop it flooding.

  1. How does Loughton Brook change as it moves downstream?

    each site and for each pebble we recorded its length, roundness and sphericity. To measure its length we used a 30 cm ruler. We took ten samples so that we could work out an average. This will help we see the difference between sites at different Stream order.

  2. Investigate change in river characteristics down stream.

    Gradient To measure the gradient, I used a clinometer. When doing so it was not really a fair test as the ranging poles could be stuck into the ground further than the other. I used a clinometer because it shows whether the gradient is positive or negative.

  1. How Do River Characteristics Vary Downstream?

    Results Analysis Hypothesis One: Discharge will increase further downstream. At eight of the twelve sites shown in Figure 3.1, the discharge is between 500 and 1000 cumecs, with no obvious linear trend. Measurements at site numbers three, seven and twelve indicate an increase in discharge downstream.

  2. 'To what extent does the River Lyn conform to the Bradshaw model of River ...

    timed to see how long it took for the propeller to move from one end to the other, and then an average was found. This was measured in seconds. Then to work out the proper velocity reading I used the calculation, 0.0277 + (3.2805 � average time in seconds).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work