• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The extent to which earthquakes are hazardous depends on where and when they are experienced

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'The extent to which earthquakes represent hazards depends on where and when they are experienced' Discuss this statement. A hazard can best be defined as a 'situation that poses a level of threat to life, health, property or the environment.' The overall impact of earthquakes as a natural hazard varies greatly from one place and timeframe to another. As do the types of hazards, which are categorised into primary and secondary. Primary hazards, created by the direct seismic energy of the earthquake, could include liquefaction, slope failure and tsunamis. These primary hazards can in turn trigger secondary hazards such as floods, fires, disease and destabilisation of infrastructure. A number of factors play a part in determining the severity of these hazards; the majority of which relate to the spatial and temporal circumstances surrounding an earthquake. For me, the most influential spatial factor is where the earthquake occurs in relation to the levels of development of that area. More economically developed countries (MEDC's) tend to cope better with the hazard of earthquakes than less economically developed countries (LEDC's) because they have all the necessary resources to survive the effects of an earthquake at their disposal. Like many MEDC's, Japan has a highly-skilled labour force working in world-leading economic and scientific sectors. This means they possess the knowledge, expertise and financial support to plan, predict (to some extent!) ...read more.

Middle

The location of an earthquake in relation to its plate boundary will obviously be fundamental when assessing its associated levels of danger. It would be fair to say that in most cases, including Kobe and Sichuan, places situated at the point where destructive plates converge are at greater risk than those situated on a constructive boundary or away from the plate margin (mid-point earthquakes). This is due to the fact that greater pressures are built up at this type of margin as one plate subducts beneath the other. However it is still debatable as to whether destructive boundaries produce more hazardous earthquakes than transform boundaries (conservative). Although the majority of the world's deadliest and highest magnitude earthquakes have been on destructive plate margins, there have been several examples of transform boundaries causing significantly high death tolls. Most notably in Haiti this year, where it is believed as many as 200,000 people lost their lives. The distance between the affected area and the earthquake's epicentre is also important. The epicentre is the point on the earth's surface directly above the earthquake focus and therefore land displacement and seismic activity is maximised at this point. Generally earthquakes which are within a few miles of the epicentre will experience greater suffering. For example Wenchuan County, the most severely hit area of the Sichuan Earthquake, was directly over the epicentre. ...read more.

Conclusion

In terms of the release of energy, each value on the Richter scale represents a x30 increase. It is therefore logical to expect that the stronger an earthquake, the more serious will be its effects. Similarly earthquakes that occur close to the surface, i.e. with a shallow focus, tend to result in a greater intensity of surface vibrations and so often cause the greatest loss of life and damage to property. Believe it or not, there are some positive impacts to earthquake activity that are not considered hazardous. Iceland's tourist industry has grown rapidly over the years and now accounts for over 8,500 jobs (4.5% of total workforce). Many of Iceland's tourist attractions revolve around its tectonic activity and location on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and so you could argue that Iceland's economy is to some extent reliant upon earthquakes. To conclude, the key spatial and temporal factors listed above leads me to believe that the extent to which earthquakes represent hazards DOES depend on where and when they are experienced. In particular, 'where' factors such as level of development and rural-urban disparities as well as 'when' factors such as time of day and time between hazards are crucial in determining the extent of damage caused by an earthquake. However every earthquake is different and it is only when a combination of the above elements come together does an earthquake become a real hazard. After all, it is estimated that over 1,400,000 earthquakes occur annually with only up to 100 of those deemed to be potentially hazardous. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hazardous Environments section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hazardous Environments essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The extent to which volcanic processes represent hazards depends on where and when they ...

    3 star(s)

    On the 31st march 1980 the USA issued a 20 mile radius around Mount St. Helens but by the time of the eruption which is on the 18th of May 1980, many people had moved back to the region. Also, on the 12th June 1991, in the Philippines as 18.6 mile radius was placed around Mount.

  2. Free essay

    Discuss the view that poverty is the real killer in earthquake disasters

    3 star(s)

    Since 1976 China has had a stringent earthquake building code. Before the quake, millions of buildings in Sichuan pre-dated the 1976 code. These older buildings were mainly low-rise masonry constructions without steel reinforcement. Without it, buildings are brittle and easily snap and collapse.

  1. "What are hazardous Environments and how can hazards be classified?"

    Around 2 million people lived within the radius of the volcano, of which their lives was devastated due to the catastrophic eruption of 79 A.D. A series of earthquakes struck the area prior to the initial eruption. As this happened in primitive times, many buildings were totally destroyed, as they had no mechanisms to protect structures.

  2. Volcanoes are more dangerous hazards than earthquakes - Discuss the truth of this statement.

    amount of time for people to evacuate. With earthquakes on the other hand this is exceedingly rare (although earthquakes can be prepared for a great deal more than volcano eruptions can). However, they have been some cases where there have been no time to prepare for a volcano. When Mt.

  1. Discuss the physical and human factors which effect the location and the impact of ...

    The construction of a dam and reservoir meant that the weight of the water in the reservoir and the increase of pressure in the rocks lubricated the fault line so that it could move easier and thus triggering off an earthquake.

  2. Earthquakes are perhaps one of natures most breathtaking, yet deadly and destructive wonders.

    There is no better example of this than the Kandla port in Gujarat which took over eight months to repair, despite it being responsible for handling over one third of India's imports. This delay in repairs has resulted in a loss of trading to other ports that were used in

  1. To what extent is the human response to hazards affected by variations in the ...

    It wasn't the initial force of the storm which caused the damage but the flooding which followed is the cause of the huge death toll which and up to 2000 people where thought to have been killed in the country of Haiti, Puerto Rico, and the Dominican Republic.

  2. Volcanic and seismic events are major pieces of evidence towards proving that plate-tectonics theory ...

    The trends of several major mountain ranges also support the hypothesis of continental drift. These mountain ranges seemingly end at the coastline of one continent only to apparently continue on another continent across the ocean. The folded Appalachian Mountains of North America, for example, trend northeastward through the eastern United States and Canada and terminate abruptly at the Newfoundland coastline.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work